Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well, I used to be catholic and active on the forum especially the catholic DIR. Would that count?
Mmhmm. My mom's medical transportation driver the last few times is a Baptist type and we were talking about the Mass and such. He didn't understand why we do some things, but he was nice and willing to learn. We both agreed that the people saying crap like we "worship" Mary and are going to hell for being Baptized "wrong" are just ignorant and not willing to listen to others to learn different viewpoints. He's a great guy.
Hello and welcome. What are you now and I am curious as to why you're not Catholic anymore if you don't mind sharing with us?
Well, I'd say that I am an agnostic, though I am attending a local christian church lately. Let's just say that I don't really prefer religion, and for the sake that this is a DIR forum, I guess I'll just leave it that way.
Sound off, Catholics. Where are all of you guys and gals?
I grew up in the Catholic faith, and practiced up until 4 years ago, pretty much. I still go to mass now, after returning to Christianity. But, there are things in the RCC that I don't agree with. I don't consider myself a ''practicing'' Catholic now, though.
I grew up in the Catholic faith, and practiced up until 4 years ago, pretty much. I still go to mass now, after returning to Christianity. But, there are things in the RCC that I don't agree with. I don't consider myself a ''practicing'' Catholic now, though.
I'm wondering what (specifically) you don't agree with?
The reason for the split in the first place was political...i.e. Enlightenment politics. Almost every tradition can be traced back to clues in scripture. The problem with tradition is that for people of the time it was it was the modern way, known so well by all, it would have been superfluous to keep writing it down. Protestants don't understand how grounded Catholics are in scripture--there's too much urban legend to overcome in an instant. I recently read a study that the majority of Protestants who convert to Catholicism in current times are the Protestants well versed in scholarship. Truth has a way of making itself known.Most Protestants do not agree with the belief that Church doctrine = New Testament doctrine. It is the reason for the split in the first place. "Sola scriptura." I was a Protestant for many years before my conversion to the Catholic Church.
The reason for the split in the first place was political...i.e. Enlightenment politics. Almost every tradition can be traced back to clues in scripture. The problem with tradition is that for people of the time it was it was the modern way, known so well by all, it would have been superfluous to keep writing it down. Protestants don't understand how grounded Catholics are in scripture--there's too much urban legend to overcome in an instant. I recently read a study that the majority of Protestants who convert to Catholicism in current times are the Protestants well versed in scholarship. Truth has a way of making itself known.
And a good number of Luther's theses would have been (and I believe, in fact, later were) implemented.I consider myself well educated on the Bible, though I am no scholar.
Martin Luther and his 95 theses are what ultimately split the church. Politicians just used the split to their advantage like they use everything to their advantage. If the pope had been willing to at least consider Luther's objections and discuss them openly the church never would have split.
I agree that Pope Leo was the wrong Pope for the time.I consider myself well educated on the Bible, though I am no scholar.
Martin Luther and his 95 theses are what ultimately split the church. Politicians just used the split to their advantage like they use everything to their advantage. If the pope had been willing to at least consider Luther's objections and discuss them openly the church never would have split.
Scholarship is what tipped me over the edge.I recently read a study that the majority of Protestants who convert to Catholicism in current times are the Protestants well versed in scholarship.
I pop in once in awhile...might spend a few weeks getting into a subject or two, then head out for awhile. I know any discussion I decide to entire will take a week or so of my time, so I pop in when I think I have time to dedicate to an honest discussion. With the holiday season coming upon us, I will probably have time to pop in more as I have vacation time to use up at work, lol.Sound off, Catholics. Where are all of you guys and gals?
It is actually quite difficult to distinguish between Catholic and Anglian theology and worship. There are small difference but often at a very debatable level of detail, that go back to times well before the split between the two churches.
However it makes for considerable differences when it comes to issues concerning women and sexuality.
And don't forget about the divorce issue. It is the reason why Henry VIII created the Anglican Church in the first place.