Her policy positions are not clear.
Could it be you are confused by the lack of cruelty and disrespect rampant in right wing policies? Normal people understand what she is advocating for quite easily.
They are not on her website and apparently she has changed her mind on some things but that was not from her but her campaign. Instead of telling me her positions or where I can find them your go to is insults. Typical.
So you aren't bothering reading what she is saying in speeches. It's in reputable news.
Yes, and she has made contradictory statement now. So without her clarifying her positions how do I know what her positions really are. Where are they on her website?
Why are you so obsessed with her website? There is plenty of other ways to learn what she is advocating for.
No she is not. She is not answering questions from them. She is telling them what she wants to say.
Yeah, that's what politicians do, say what they want to say.
That has nothing to do with Trump. His stance is to leave it up to the states. He is ok with some states having abortion and some not.
That's his excuse for being responsible for nominating justices who would overturn Roe. If he is OK with states allowing abortion why was he so willing to nominate justices who would eliminate it nationally? What makes it ok for some states but not the nation? These far right republicans are committed to eliminate abortion access nationally, and the SCOTUS was the first step. Look at how some red states are trying to limit pregnant citizens from traveling to get abortion services. It's sick.
No, she wants to take away private health insurance and take away my choice. She has said this in the past.
I don't believe you. But let's say she did, so what? The result would be healthcare for all citizens. You seem more concerned about insurance companies than healthcare access for all citizens.
The horse and buggy was replaced by the free market. It was not mandated by the government. That is what I have a problem with. Do you understand the difference
Who cares? Doesn't it make more sense for the govenrnment to implement a change than the chaos of a free market? That sort of planning will make it less expensive in the long run. Don't you think oil companines want to know when the phase out will occur? Of course we know that MAGAs, like yourself, are OK with big government forcing women to give birth, but not to manage a change in how automobiles are designed and built.
Are you serious. Companies do not cause inflation, governments do.
Well then what's your problem with Harris using government to reduce inflation? Make up your mind.
Harris's quotes on border wall:
President Trump’s border wall is “un-American.” Harris
Trump’s border wall is a “medieval vanity project
“I’m not gonna vote for a [border] wall under any circumstances
“Trump’s border wall is a complete waste of taxpayer money and won’t make us any safer.
Looks sane to me. Trump's border wall was a twice failed promise that would never work anyway.
negatory good buddy. You have bought the leftist propaganda.
No, I am naturally ethical and compassionate for the nation, and right wing politics are immoral and undemocratic. I am disappointeds that so many citizens align with right wing agendas that have so many cruel and unethical attitudes. It definately has made some otherwise good people bad and intolerant.
Here are some of the reasons why the conservatives did not support the border wall:
1. Under current law the president has authority to shutdown the border if he deem sit detrimental to the US. This law would have limited the president's authority until the 7 day average border crossings is above 4000.
2. It also states that this legislation cannot be activated for more than 270 calendar days the first year after the effective date, 225 days in year 2 and 180 days in the third year.
3. it mandates a minimum of 1400 inadmissible aliens be processed each day.
4. 1-3 place restrictions on what the president can do now, it does not help the president.
5. Authorizes an additional 16,000 detention beds that are not full today. The problem is not detention beds but the president swill to detain them.
6. Authorizes $1.4B to communities struggling to handle the immigrants. Sanctuary cities should pay for it themselves, they said they would. It would provide public funding for illegal aliens. Why is that a good idea?
I doubt any of this is valid. It looks like an afterthought designed to justify Trump's sabotage of the bill that republicans largely created.
Biden and Harris can secure the border today without this legislation, Trump did it without this legislation. And so I will still complain about the non action by Biden and Harris on the border. It has been completely their debacle.
Trump couldn't close the bordrr until there was a reason, and that was the pandemic. Notice he didn't do it before that. But he did cage many migrants, not "illegals" way past the 24 hour minimum, and without proper sanitation and shelter. He violated federal and international laws while doing his crackdown. This included kidnapping well over a 1000 children from their families and trafficing them to who knows where. Nearly 600 kids are still missing due to a lack of paperwork. And you MAGAs want the USA to trust this criminal candidate again?
The vice president is expected to focus on both curbing the current flow of migrants and coordinating with countries in the region to address the root causes of migration.
www.nbcnews.com
A senior administration official said Harris' role would focus on "two tracks": both curbing the current flow of migrants and implementing a long-term strategy that addresses the root causes of migration.
Has she done either of these things? No.
Even Trump couldn't curb the flow of migrants, despite his cruel and criminal policies in dealing with them. Do you expect Harros to do something better within the law? The reason the Biden administration worled with republicans to create a new law for the border is because they have to follow current laws. Trump violated some of the laws, but he's corrupt and inept.
Let's work to get rid of Trump and MAGA so the democrats and republicans can work togther to form a new law to manage the flow of migrants.