No they don't. You are either mistaken or you are just making stuff up.No, but they do have records that indicate who are Mary's descendants. The DNA can be obtained from them.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No they don't. You are either mistaken or you are just making stuff up.No, but they do have records that indicate who are Mary's descendants. The DNA can be obtained from them.
Sure they do.No, but they do have records that indicate who are Mary's descendants.
Wrong. The Israelis are very, very good at record keeping concerning who descended from whom. One could very easily check the DNA from Mary's line to compare to whatever was supposedly the remains of Jesus.
No they don't. You are either mistaken or you are just making stuff up.
You're a Poe, aren't you?Yes, they do. The Israelis keep meticulous records. Check this for an example:
http://www.archives.gov.il/ArchiveGov_Eng/Our+Holdings/Family/
Wrong. The Israelis are very, very good at record keeping concerning who descended from whom. One could very easily check the DNA from Mary's line to compare to whatever was supposedly the remains of Jesus.
ok....I didn't read the entire thread.....
It is off-topic; isn't it? Pleasewhere is Mohhameds(pbuh)body
The Christian never believe that what ascended was not the physical body but the glorious body. Right?Are you really going to argue that the lack of a specific, long-dead person's remains from over two-thousand years ago is a compelling argument for their bodily resurrection? This leads to rather obvious absurdity which I'm sure you well see.
I believe in the resurrection but not on the basis of such desperate argumentation. It's rare for remains to last for any prolonged amount of time, it requires specific conditions. Furthermore, why would the Romans have keep track of Jesus' body assuming for augment it had not resurrected?
A reasonable argument.Wait? Where are all the bodies of all of them? We don't have them, so they all must've resurrected from the dead. No one can dispute that fact. We don't have them, so they must be alive now.
It is off-topic; isn't it? Please
Regards
would you mind if i made a new thread and tagged you in it. maybe quote you ?It is off-topic; isn't it? Please
Regards
A good point.Well the Gospels tell us that the last people to have custody of the remains of Jesus were Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus... there was time between the "burial" and when temple guards were set over the tomb and when His female followers were going to the tomb. Mary Magdalene announced the remains of Jesus were moved... The disciples didn't appear to check with Joseph of Arimathea to confirm where the remains were.
There is a possibility. Jesus got married, as it is said, so there could be his progeny, those who claim to be from his progeny their DNA would match with Jesus' DNA. The problem would be solved.Since there is not a DNA sample of Jesus on file, even if remains were recovered there is no way of proving that those remains belonged to Jesus.
Moot point, the OP is.
You may start such a thread, an open thread for everybody not specifically addressed to me, I may contribute to it.would you mind if i made a new thread and tagged you in it. maybe quote you ?
A good suggestion indeed.Wrong. The Israelis are very, very good at record keeping concerning who descended from whom. One could very easily check the DNA from Mary's line to compare to whatever was supposedly the remains of Jesus.
Not necessarily true.All the evidence we have is equally consistent with:
- his decomposed remains are somewhere in Judea.
The evidence fits slightly worse (but still decently) with:
- his remains aren't anywhere because he didn't literally exist.
Jesus' mother got married with Joseph, the carpenter; and Jesus had brothers and sisters.You think that "the Israelis" have "DNA from Mary's line" on file somewhere?
A practical suggestion indeed.No, but they do have records that indicate who are Mary's descendants. The DNA can be obtained from them.
The Christian never believe that what ascended was not the physical body but the glorious body. Right?
So, remains of the Jesus physical body should be looked into.
The possible solution is to investigate all the possible places where it is said Jesus went after the event of Crucifixion, if he ever died on the Cross. Then one place among such places could hint where his remains are buried.
Regards