ElishaElijah
Return
In regards to where Jesus was buried what or whose evidence are you following, the name of the person or persons.I tend to follow the evidence.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
In regards to where Jesus was buried what or whose evidence are you following, the name of the person or persons.I tend to follow the evidence.
What do you mean by "whose evidence". Evidence does not belong to anyone.In regards to where Jesus was buried what or whose evidence are you following, the name of the person or persons.
Evidence is collected by someone so where is your source and who collected the evidence you’re following?What do you mean by "whose evidence". Evidence does not belong to anyone.
Oh, then the evidence of historians.Evidence is collected by someone so where is your source and who collected the evidence you’re following?
Which ones, their names and dates they lived and collected the evidence?Oh, then the evidence of historians.
Oh lord, I do not keep track of them that closely. Why does it matter? It appears that you want to attack the individual and not the evidence.Which ones, their names and dates they lived and collected the evidence?
Not at all, you said you follow the evidence so I’m asking who your source is exactly and the dates their evidence was collected.Oh lord, I do not keep track of them that closely. Why does it matter? It appears that you want to attack the individual and not the evidence.
And I answer that question. Oddly enough you did not answer mine.Not at all, you said you follow the evidence so I’m asking who your source is exactly and the dates their evidence was collected.
You provided no source, names or dates of the historians who collected the evidence you’re following.And I answer that question. Oddly enough you did not answer mine.
The other question I had for you was what does the evidence say that you are following?Oh, then the evidence of historians.
The available evidence tells us that the resurrection story is filled with problems and probably did not occur any more than Mohammed's trip around the Moon on the back of a winged horse happened.The other question I had for you was what does the evidence say that you are following?
Will refer you to Matthew 26-27 for the story on that.Before we go on, who tried and convicted and crucified Jesus? Was it the Romans or the Jews?
You keep making statements without referencesThe available evidence tells us that the resurrection story is filled with problems and probably did not occur any more than Mohammed's trip around the Moon on the back of a winged horse happened.
No, I want you to answer the questions. Don't play that silly game.Will refer you to Matthew 26-27 for the story on that.
I did answer, Matthew 26-27 and here is Peter’s eyewitness testimony:No, I want you to answer the questions. Don't play that silly game.
This is common knowledge. If I make a claim that you need me to support just ask. I will gladly answer reasonable demands. Here is a freebie:You keep making statements without references
Nope. You did not and still have not. Was the crucifixion under Roman Law, did Romans try, convict, and sentence Jesus, or was it Jewish?I did answer, Matthew 26-27 and here is Peter’s eyewitness testimony:
““Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a Man attested by God to you by miracles, wonders, and signs which God did through Him in your midst, as you yourselves also know— Him, being delivered by the determined purpose and foreknowledge of God, you have taken by lawless hands, have crucified, and put to death; whom God raised up, having loosed the pains of death, because it was not possible that He should be held by it. For David says concerning Him: ‘I foresaw the Lord always before my face, For He is at my right hand, that I may not be shaken. Therefore my heart rejoiced, and my tongue was glad; Moreover my flesh also will rest in hope. For You will not leave my soul in Hades, Nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption. You have made known to me the ways of life; You will make me full of joy in Your presence.’ “Men and brethren, let me speak freely to you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. Therefore, being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him that of the fruit of his body, according to the flesh, He would raise up the Christ to sit on his throne, he, foreseeing this, spoke concerning the resurrection of the Christ, that His soul was not left in Hades, nor did His flesh see corruption. This Jesus God has raised up, of which we are all witnesses. Therefore being exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He poured out this which you now see and hear.”
Acts 2:22-33 NKJV
I gave you the references so see for yourself, it’s an easy answer, so now that you have my answer and references, names, approximate dates, seems you’re the one playing silly games.Nope. You did not and still have not. Was the crucifixion under Roman Law, did Romans try, convict, and sentence Jesus, or was it Jewish?
All it would have taken is one word. You can use the Bible to defend your claim, but the Bible is not an answer.
I gave you the references so see for yourself, it’s an easy answer, so now that you have my answer and references, names, approximate dates, seems you’re the one playing silly games.
BothPlease, try again.