On the evolution of hearing (Google is your friend):
https://www.google.com/search?q=evo...5.3567j0j8&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8
https://www.google.com/search?q=evo...5.3567j0j8&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Which first evolved and which organism ?
Smell would be my vote. I can picture a cavemen after a heavy meal of woolly mammoth and swamp greens passing a particular pungent cloud of gas. I can picture another caveman close by jumping up with a disgusted look on his face and yelling, "WTH is that smell and who did it?" thus prompting speech. Concurrently hearing would follow to provide an early warning of other potential eye-waterers.
I think speaking would be far, far more useful if people would also make use of hearing..I'll bet everything I got on 'hearing'. It was useful even before speech.
In the land of the smelly, the allergy-ridden man is king.Yep, that'd do it. A clan of 10-15 people, all on high protein diets in one small cave. oof!
In the land of the smelly, the allergy-ridden man is king.
...I have almost no sense of smell... severe hyposmia. It may be the death of me. I can only tell by sight if food has gone bad.
...
Man that has to suck. Smell is how we taste a lot of stuff too. Damn.
Was that really your entire purpose of this thread? To ask a question and reply to the first person who answers it with"Nope! There's no evidence for that!"???No evidence for which was the first organism to evolve with the ability to produce sound as means of communication.
Good point -as we can talk to ourselves/hear ourselves without speaking via the aural loop (bypassing the need to speak and hear ourselves), figuring out how that works would be a good place to start.It's an interesting question, because it really comes down to a more exact definition to what hearing is.
Was that really your entire purpose of this thread? To ask a question and reply to the first person who answers it with"Nope! There's no evidence for that!"???
Well where did you get the idea that many animals 'got' hearing at the same time? Sounds like you just don't quite understand what 'evolution'means.They think that hearing started with the lungfish but i can't see a clear line of how speech evolved as many animals got it at the same time which is impossible, for example the ants can speak,so how all types got the beneficial mutation for gaining such capabilities at the same time.
They think that hearing started with the lungfish but i can't see a clear line of how speech evolved as many animals got it at the same time which is impossible, for example the ants can speak,so how all types got the beneficial mutation for gaining such capabilities at the same time.
They think that hearing started with the lungfish but i can't see a clear line of how speech evolved as many animals got it at the same time which is impossible, for example the ants can speak,so how all types got the beneficial mutation for gaining such capabilities at the same time.
Which first evolved and which organism ?