When I look at right hand path religions I see this idea of bettering yourself and bettering the world. Yet these religions often simply seem selfish, self promoting, and redundant.
Let me start with the personal level. As a Luciferian I understand the different paradigms affect different people. Christianity may be good for person A whereas Satanism is good for B and Buddhism for C. In theory they want the same goal - self betterment. Heaven, apotheosis, nirvana, etc.
Not exactly. Self denial can be a powerful drive, as can straight opportunity to seek prestige and influence. For many people just keeping busy can be the goal, even.
But then many - especially the Right - just come to pushing their religion around and forcing some horribly negative affects on people. They don't care what actually helps, they care about being right.
Hmm... come to think of it, "being right" is not at all a popular motivation.
Having things one's own way is far more popular, so much so as to be mistaken for it. But that is still not the same thing, not by a long shot.
This makes the RHP seem much more "bad" to me because it is blinded with selfishness and arrogance. The Luciferian understands that what works for them might not for you. Setianism won't even let you join if they don't believe their temple can help you. These groups promote enlightened individualism in hopes that all people can stand on their own and better themselves - meanwhile the Right simply desires their own salvation and fights for their own arrogance.
Arrogance is certainly a major danger for what is usually described as RHP, as is selfishness.
Not having true experience with LHP groups beyond some Internet exchanges, I have no idea of how well they work in practice. Acknowledging that there are differences in individual suitability to specific teachings is certainly sound, but it is so very easy for people to be deluded about their own perceptions...
The other side is on a worldwide scale, where the above problems just escalate. The Right will even deny or try and reverse human progress to aid their cause. They will launch psychological attacks at their enemies to either convert or break them. This is vastly more the "evil" and "darkness" than the left leaving room for everyone and having the "out a group" shun itself and create its own downfall. Likewise the Right can be seen to show such hypocracy it cannot even he respected. Huge youth groups, mega churches, only helping those they can convert - this is nothing that any of the main religions promote at heart yet what the followers do.
That is true, but not necessarily representative. Those distortions should certainly be corrected, troublesome as that is in practice. But even in what you call the RHP people have personal discernment and may well end up wiser than their own religious teachers give them credit for.
Conversely, the high personal freedom LHP offers will not
always be a good thing. People
do lose their way of their own, although it is very difficult to tell exactly when or to have a practical answer to offer when it is acknowledged.
So which is the light and which is the dark? Which will benefit humanity and which will bring it to ruins? Would you rather have leaders who have individual best interests in mind,
"Individual" is a bit of a tricky word here. Considering social implications is of utmost importance IMO.
who want people to rule themselves with only necessary oversight,
"Necessary", too, is a tricky word. Different people and different circunstances will interpret it as "just over misery boundaries", "just
under misery boundaries", and many other alternate readings too.
Understanding and being clear and convincing about what such necessity is and what it entails is a
major challenge and a major conquest.
Some will insist that it is outright impossible to do.
and who want to adapt and thrive? Or do you want leaders who only want to rule the people, destroy the individual, and help themselves?
Not too many people actually want to help themselves, IMO. Far more think they do, though.