Which Position Intuitvely Makes the Most Sense to You?

[Trailblazer]

and it's not worth the argument

I certainly agree.
Unless someone is looking to change their position there is no point discussing what has already been discussed.

 

[lewisnotmiller]

Which position, if either, intuitively sounds more likely to you:

1) God either exists or does not exist.

2) God neither exists nor does not exist.

I'm rolling with one. God is a human conception (imho) and as such can be defined. However, some concepts of God do exist (I just don't see them as God) and others are much less analogous with a seperable sentient being.

So I understand instances where 2 applies. It's just not the majority of what I see and need to deal with.

 

[lewisnotmiller]

Most definitely 1.

2 is, for everything that one might think of as "real," a logical inconsistency. Substitute anything ostensible for "God" and you will instantly see what I mean.

Love?

 

[Milton Platt]

Which position, if either, intuitively sounds more likely to you:

1) God either exists or does not exist.

2) God neither exists nor does not exist.

Logic dictates that number one is valid and true.

 

[Milton Platt]

It can be true as long as we conclude that 'existence' (or its lack) is not applicable to God.
It is a pretty crazy idea though.

Explain how that is logically possible.

 

[viole]

Which position, if either, intuitively sounds more likely to you:

1) God either exists or does not exist.

2) God neither exists nor does not exist.

1) if God is Classic
2) if He is Quantistic

Ciao

- viole