"White pride"

[Riverwolf]

There's nothing wrong with being a white supremacist, as long as it deals with healthy and respectful white pride.

Except that those two conceptions are inherently contradictory. White supremacy is, by nature and definition, unhealthy and disrespectful of others.

There's a world of difference between pride in one's ancestry and/or ethnicity, and believing one's "race" to be inherently superior to all others.

 

[Majikthise]

I'm not sure. Nobody blamed him for being rational.

You take what you hear second hand as truth.
He was joking. People are always judging him when they never listen to him in context.
I'm an atheist. I only take issue with him on his religious crap, which he usually keeps to a minimum. If some people would take the time they'd find him a funny , intelligent and self deprecating guy.

 

[Majikthise]

White Pride is mostly just a way for privileged people to carve out a niche in the culture of victimhood.


Tom

Never saw it that way.
Thanks for that!:yes:

 

[Desert Snake]

Define 'white' first, then consider the question.

 

[At The Left Hand ov God]

Maybe it's the feminists who are pumping our meat and dairy animals full of hormones to increase their size and yield, including estrogen.

It's a conspiracy!

 

[Adramelek]

This is an interesting thread. What I will say is that I am a white, heterosexual, male who is proud to be a Setian/Satanist and has been for the past 25 years. I will also add, if I were a black, female, lesbian I would be just as proud to be a Setian/Satanist.

Xeper.
/Adramelek\

 

[EyeofOdin]

You take what you hear second hand as truth.
He was joking. People are always judging him when they never listen to him in context.
I'm an atheist. I only take issue with him on his religious crap, which he usually keeps to a minimum. If some people would take the time they'd find him a funny , intelligent and self deprecating guy.

Well then he's even more of an idiot because if that's true (which I don't think it is. He really didn't sound like he was joking) he's satirizing his own ideology and implying that "liberal" argument that the penis shrinkage has really been caused by climate change.

For the record, I think both of these explanations are absurd.

 

[Majikthise]

Some get his sense of humor and some don't.
I find liberals don't have the ability to poke fun at themselves very often if ever.
It's called "taking yourself too seriously".

 

[Amechania]

Some get his sense of humor and some don't.
I find liberals don't have the ability to poke fun at themselves very often if ever.
It's called "taking yourself too seriously".

Have you ever hear of John Stewart or Steven Colbert? They're liberal political comedian whose stock-in-trade is self-deprecating humor. Stewart literally and Colbert ironically. Limbaugh is affable and clever. He is also a blatant propagandist who gets paid to spin the truth into a lie. He's good at it.

 

[Riverwolf]

Some get his sense of humor and some don't.
I find liberals don't have the ability to poke fun at themselves very often if ever.
It's called "taking yourself too seriously".

You serious? We poke fun at ourselves all the time! It's you stuck-up puritanical conservatives who can't take a joke!!

(...and in case you couldn't tell, that was a joke)

 

[Majikthise]

Have you ever hear of John Stewart or Steven Colbert? They're liberal political comedian whose stock-in-trade is self-deprecating humor. Stewart literally and Colbert ironically. Limbaugh is affable and clever. He is also a blatant propagandist who gets paid to spin the truth into a lie. He's good at it.

Yeah , they were hilarious when i used to smoke dope a lot. Neither of them do any thoughtful, controversial or though provoking commentary. They are comedians , they stay in the safe, politically correct zones where they are assured a captive audience and an uninterrupted sponsor cash flow.
I watched them for years before Colbert had his own show. Guaranteed you've never listened to any conservative narrative long enough to pass judgement. Only what you've been told second hand by the pitiful regressive media.
Btw, I'm not a conservative.

 

[Thruve]

Someone a couple weeks ago messaged me on Facebook talking about how I'm anti Christian and anti white and how stupid I am because "us liberals" don't like white, straight, Christian pride.

I'm proud of my religion. I'm not anti Christian, just historically accurate.

I'm not anti straight, but only when straight people are afraid of being themselves, bullied in school, bullied and stripped of their rights by the government will I be singing the praises of straight pride parades.

Do not talk to me about "white pride". I hail and honor over 40.000 years of European heritage and European ancestors. I have more "white pride" than he ever will.

Heterosexual people are being stripped of their rights by the government?
They are bullied? LOL.
Dude can you prove this? Im going antisocialist if this is seriously the case whereever you are in europe..

 

[Thruve]

White Pride is mostly just a way for privileged people to carve out a niche in the culture of victimhood.

I used to lurk on Stormfront occasionally for laughs. It's a hoot.

Tom

Hey Tom, Can we brofist just because were white? and gay.

 

[Riverwolf]

Heterosexual people are being stripped of their rights by the government?
They are bullied? LOL.
Dude can you prove this? Im going antisocialist if this is seriously the case whereever you are in europe..

He was speaking hypothetically.

Yeah , they were hilarious when i used to smoke dope a lot. Neither of them do any thoughtful, controversial or though provoking commentary. They are comedians , they stay in the safe, politically correct zones where they are assured a captive audience and an uninterrupted sponsor cash flow.

Regardless of opinion, their existence still proves your original comment "liberals take themselves too seriously" wrong.

 

[Apocalypse-Now]

Double-checking my source, I wasn't terribly far off, it seems:

BBC News - Hunter-gatherer European had blue eyes and dark skin

So are you suggesting Modern Europeans wouldn't have light skin at all were it not for interbreeding with Neanderthals?

Are you saying the entire population across the whole Eurasian continent would still have dark skin were it not for interbreeding with Neanderthals?

So is light skin purely a geographical adaptation by Neanderthals?

 

[Riverwolf]

So are you suggesting Modern Europeans wouldn't have light skin at all were it not for interbreeding with Neanderthals?

Are you saying the entire population across the whole Eurasian continent would still have dark skin were it not for interbreeding with Neanderthals?

So is light skin purely a geographical adaptation by Neanderthals?

What in the name of Woden's long white beard do neanderthals have to do with this? We had dark skin until about 6-7000 years ago; neanderthals went extinct about 40,000 years ago.

 

[Apocalypse-Now]

What in the name of Woden's long white beard do neanderthals have to do with this? We had dark skin until about 6-7000 years ago; neanderthals went extinct about 40,000 years ago.

You mean dark like Middle Easterners, or Sub Saharan Africa?

And how did the dark skin disappear?

 

[Estro Felino]

Except that those two conceptions are inherently contradictory. White supremacy is, by nature and definition, unhealthy and disrespectful of others.

There's a world of difference between pride in one's ancestry and/or ethnicity, and believing one's "race" to be inherently superior to all others.

I think that each country is supposed to have a recognizable ethnic group. Because the race is the result of climatic and geographical features.
I do respect all cultures, races etc...because I am a Christian and other ethnic groups are an enrichment.

In an idealistic and Utopian society, I would prefer that there were less Nordic people, given that I live in a Mediterranean island.
and in an idealistic and Utopian Scandinavia, it would be more logical to have all Nordic people

 

[Riverwolf]

You mean dark like Middle Easterners, or Sub Saharan Africa?

Read the article I linked to, and you'll see an artistic rendition of what we looked like.

And how did the dark skin disappear?

Genetic mutation, just like all other physical aspects that differentiate us from peoples in other geographical locations. It stuck around because lighter skin is actually better for absorbing vitamin D from Sun in the low-light environment that is Northern Europe.

In other words, basic natural selection.

I think that each country is supposed to have a recognizable ethnic group. Because the race is the result of climatic and geographical features.

"Race" is just a cultural term. It has no scientifically recognized biological existence. Countries change with the changes of political times; they're not often going to have singularly recognized ethnic groups as a result. Even take a place like Ireland that has distinguishing physical features; many of those features come from other ethnic groups, including the iconic red hair, which comes from the Nordic people.

In an ideal and Utopian society,

One person's utopia is another's dystopia.

 

[Faybull]

By "white pride", do you mean like prison tattoos of "white pride" in black ink?