• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Who Can Prove God's Existence?

Freelancer7

Freelancer7

Active Member
No, what I am Saying is God is.. A Love Ball, of creation and genius, and a creator is not going to be saying hello when their is much manipulation and jealousy around, but what I am saying. the Trinity is a God Head, but not the Creator
 
Freelancer7

Freelancer7

Active Member
Mestemia said:
I see.
So he is not going to show up till after humans are extinct...
Nice to know.
Click to expand...


haha...I see your point, no, possibly, love, might winover?? Might sound far off, but it is possible, especially if some high up people who can make things happen find out they have been used like muppets??
 
Freelancer7

Freelancer7

Active Member
haha...I am thick, like they say, the possibility of getting from one side of the universe to the other? hehe.. yeah, through a worm hole? But just perhaps would be in a form that the people of a planet would imagine the Creator to be?!
 
Kilgore Trout

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
NGerty said:
Who Can Prove God's Existence?
Click to expand...

Only god's proof of its existence would have any relevance. It would be easy enough for a god to do - so I suspect that if there were a god, and it cared whether people knew about its existence, then we'd have no controversy on the subject.
 
Freelancer7

Freelancer7

Active Member
atotalstranger said:
Only god's proof of its existence would have any relevance. It would be easy enough for a god to do - so I suspect that if there were a god, and it cared whether people knew about its existence, then we'd have no controversy on the subject.
Click to expand...


depends, grey hairs can be a funny thing, just like boney bones, God is Truth, does not live by money, yet money would come from the one that played the games who said he was a giver to please, God pleases the mind, not the physical body, for he makes the blind see, not as in physical, but in spiritual.
 
Kilgore Trout

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
Freelancer7 said:
depends, grey hairs can be a funny thing, just like boney bones, God is Truth, does not live by money, yet money would come from the one that played the games who said he was a giver to please, God pleases the mind, not the physical body, for he makes the blind see, not as in physical, but in spiritual.
Click to expand...

Indeed - this reflects many peoples' confusion.
 
ManTimeForgot

ManTimeForgot

Temporally Challenged
The correct answer is no one can. That which is not tautologically true (self-evident and necessary for existence to even be in the first place) cannot be proven conclusively. It is tautologically true that certain statements are equivalent, but those all use variables. Once you start inserting real world words into slots where variables used to be logic starts to break down simply because people will not all agree on one definition or another. And how can you identify something if you don't know what it is?

But since you came here not looking for someone to answer you affirmatively, but rather to have an argument against I suggest you try this one on for size...

MTF
 
I

interfaithdilaog

Member
Actually, everything that we see every moment and everything that we imagine at every moment are the proof of the existence of God. Everything must have a producer or creator, so we humans must also.

If you need more info and logical examples you can look at the links below,



Especially the book of "Questions and Answer" is great for you.
 
A

ark_of_salvation

New Member
Mestemia said:
So who/what produced/created god?
Click to expand...
Your arguement is elogical, you speak as if that everything must have creator.However this is logically not correct. The right concept is every created thing has a creator. doesnt it sound more logical to you? Suppose i asked you that john has entered the hospital and is giving birth to a baby, can you guess if the newborn is a boy or a girl.Clearly your logic would suggest that the man can neither give birth to the boy or the girl. this man can not conceive or create a baby,just in the same way god almighty can not be created he is the only creator of all things created:sarcastic
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top