You are the reason I never forget to laugh.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Lucifer is just a name, just as Jesus, or whatever god-man you follow, he is the other side of the same coin.
Can I ask, a title for what ?.Lucifer is a title, as I use it. I do not use it as a name at all.
I call him Lucifer since that is his name. I don't really like calling him Satan since the christians gave him that name because they think of him as someone evil. I have gotten in debates with christians on google plus that they got pissed at me because I kept calling him Lucifer. They said that the name Lucifer isn't his name anymore.Lucifer is just a name, just as Jesus, or whatever god-man you follow, he is the other side of the same coin.
I call him Lucifer since that is his name. I don't really like calling him Satan since the christians gave him that name because they think of him as someone evil. I have gotten in debates with christians on google plus that they got pissed at me because I kept calling him Lucifer. They said that the name Lucifer isn't his name anymore.
We all have different views on who Lucifer is."Lucifer" has never been His name, unless you are referring to a minor Greco Roman deity, which you are not.
In fact, "Lucifer", in the King James version of the Bible refers to a human king, not a fallen malach. While I am still uncertain if Isaiah is referencing a spirit behind the King or not, it is clear the term "Lucifer" is just a title. It refers to Venus, The Morning Star.
We all have different views on who Lucifer is.
And how so?If you are claiming Lucifer is His name and using the Bible as your source, you are just perpetuating a lie.
Because "Lucifer" is mentioned only once and in only one translation of the Bible, two if you count the new version. The King James and New King James Version. The term, "Haylel" is generally translated "Day Star" or "Morning Star". In both, "Lucifer" is a title, and applied to a human king.And how so?
Some people believe the Beelzebub is Lucifer but I believe they are different beings.What about Beelzebub, that's a good name.
Some people believe the Beelzebub is Lucifer but I believe they are different beings.
Lucifer is literally nothing. It is a metaphor of criticism directed to the king of Babylon in Isaiah. Jesus himself is often referred to as that, and there are like 2-3 "Saint Lucifer of Wherever".
If I were to say, "the light bringer in Latin" it would be "lucifer" the word is still used in in catholic masses. Usually as, "luciferi" though.
Also, in Latin there is the problem... Lucifer as an adjective applied to Venus rising in the dawn. Lucifer as a noun applied to the light cast from the moon. That meaning is largely lost on modern folks, but a quick study of Latin would reveal that.
Generally, the Christian understanding of the word Lucifer is not authentic. It is borrowed from Dante's Inferno, etc... It's a revision of the history, and basically inaccurate...
Phosphorus and Lucifer are related, regardless of biblical connotations.
Basically, outside of Greco-Roman revival paganism Lucifer is a phantom outside of a daemon in historical ceremonial magic text.
I kinda do disagree that "Lucifer" is a "title". We all have our own opinions. Just saying.Because "Lucifer" is mentioned only once and in only one translation of the Bible, two if you count the new version. The King James and New King James Version. The term, "Haylel" is generally translated "Day Star" or "Morning Star". In both, "Lucifer" is a title, and applied to a human king.
I kinda do disagree that "Lucifer" is a "title". We all have our own opinions. Just saying.