You said "So who cares about who the Baha'i Jesus and Christian Jesus is...", Thats the topic.
Coming to a topic and asking "who cares" doesn't make sense. Its like going to an art class and saying "who cares about art".
Or, is it like going to art class when the building is on fire and saying, "Who cares about art... I'm getting outta here." And the rest of the quote is...
So who cares about who the Baha'i Jesus and Christian Jesus is... Who is their God? How do either justify believing in a God like this? And this God did not seem to believe in "progressive" revelation. It doesn't sound like he was the one who sent messengers to other people.
You posted all the things that the God that Christians and Bahai's say they believe in allegedly did. If this God did those things, why do Christians and Baha'is believe in him? That's a bigger issue than what Christians believe about their own prophet as compared to what Baha'is tell them what is true and what they should believe about their prophet. How do both of them explain God's behavior in the Bible?
You brought it up. You posted all those things about what God did. All I'm saying is if we believe the Bible as true, then how do we explain God's behavior? If those things are true, that is way more important than whatever we believe about who has the correct interpretation of who Jesus is? I respect your knowledge and opinions greatly. So instead of saying "who cares" doesn't make sense... tell me... did God really do these things? Like I tell Baha'is, I'm okay if you say it is mythological... that the ancients Israelites made up stories of how great and powerful their God is... and how he will judge and punish those that oppose him or disobey him. But, if you say that is exactly true and God did those things, then I'd side with the Baha'is and say "no" those things can't be true. There must be a better explanation and interpretation.
With who Jesus is, however, that makes a very big difference on whose interpretation we believe, the Christians or Baha'is. One we get a Savior who is the only one by which we can have our sins forgiven. The other, we have a "nice" guy who preached love and was killed for it, but he promised that God would send another "Christ", actually three more "Christs", and that the third one would lead the world into peace and harmony. Great... unless the Christian interpretation is correct, then anybody that doesn't accept and believe in that interpretation is lost in their sin and will be condemned and judged by God.
So "who cares?" That was only relative to the bigger issue of who is this God they both say they believe in. For another thread? Fine. I'll agree with that. And, I'll agree with you, on this thread, we all should "care" which Jesus is the true Jesus. I don't want to argue with you about this, and I hope you understand where I'm coming from and what I'm trying to say.