• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Who Told the First Lie in the Bible ?

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Their bodies would not have ever died on earth because they had the fruit of the tree of life to eat. As God referenced in Genesis 3:23 - ... lest perhaps he put forth his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever... So they would still be in the body when taken to heaven, and we know they would have been taken to heaven because that's where Jesus said the saved are taken; that's our intended eternity.
Animals do not have souls like humans because they were not created in the image and likeness of God.
Ecclesiastes 9 - First of all, this chapter is not about death. It's about living your life on earth while you're here to live it. After you die, you are gone and forgotten, and have nothing more to do with the activities on earth. Verse 9:5 is often quoted to support the notion that there is no consciousness after physical death, but the translation "For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing..." is not quite accurate. In the Latin Vulgate Bible, which predates any Protestant Bible by over 1,000 years it says "For the living know that they shall die, but but the dead know nothing more..." Knowing nothing and knowing nothing more are two different things.
I said the body and soul are one in the earthly life. The soul exits the body at the moment of physical death and continues to live. The mind continues to function with perfect clarity independently of the brain. The senses function without physical organs even better than they did in the body. The soul has no physical mass, but does have a substance and a form which is visible to other spirits.
The scripture that illustrates this most clearly is Luke 16:19-31, the Rich Man and Lazarus. They both died and they are both in Sheol in this parable. Lazarus is in the pleasant part of Sheol, the Bosom of Abraham, where the good went, and the rich man is in the place of punishment or possibly in the purifying fire. There is a divide between them, but they can see and recognize each other. The rich man feels pain and thirst even though he has no physical sensory organs. In verse 24, He references body parts which no longer exist, but are still represented in the soul: ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire."

Wasn't the physical resurrection of Jesus' friend Lazarus in John 11 vs 11-14 a real happening ?________
Whereas the Lazarus named in the illustration or parable of Luke 16 was Not a real happening but an illustration or a parable.

Wasn't what Jesus said in John chapter 11 about death true when Jesus likened death to sleep ?_______
By age 12 Jesus already had a well-rounded education about the old Hebrew Scriptures to the point he could intelligently converse with the spiritually older men of his day.
In the old Hebrew Scriptures at Psalm 6:6 Douay says for among the dead No one remembers you (God) ;........
At Psalm 113 B:17 Douay, or Psalm 115:17 It is Not the dead who praise the Lord.....
At Psalm 145:3 Douay, or Psalm 146:4 when his spirit departs he returns to the earth; on that day his plans perish.
The Psalms are in harmony with Ecclesiastes 9:5 that the dead No longer know anything......
There is No knowledge where the dead go - Ecclesiastes 9:10

Adam became a living being, a living person - Genesis 2:7 Douay.
How did Adam ' become ' a living person, but that happened when God ' breathed the breath of life ' into lifeless Adam.
When Adam drew his last breath, then Adam became a dead person.
Since Adam had No pre-person experience before Adam ' became ' alive by the breath of God, then at death, according to Genesis 3:19, Adam ' returned ' to the dust of the ground, A person can Not return to a place he never was before.
Adam simply went from non-life, to life, then returned or went back to non-life in the dust of the ground.
There was No postmortem penalty or reward for Adam.

What kept Job alive according to Job 33:4 but the spirit of God made Job, the ' breath ' of the Almighty kept Job alive.
As with Adam, it was the ' breath of life ' from God that kept them alive. No breath No life anywhere.

It's both: people are living souls, and animals are living souls, as mentioned at Numbers 31:28
Don't both people and animals go to the same place according to Ecclesiastes 3:19,20 ?_______
 

Forever_Catholic

Active Member
OK, can I ask you what being "saved" actually means to you? What are we being "saved" from exactly?
“Saved” means having salvation; receiving the sanctifying grace necessary to enter heaven. We are being saved from eternal damnation.

And as far as I can see, as long as Adam and his wife ate from the tree of life, they never would have died....that means "living forever" was meant to take place here on earth, not in heaven.
No it doesn’t. There would be no point in living on earth forever. Jesus made plenty of references to eternal life, none of which were ever misunderstood to mean eternal life on earth. Even the earth itself is not eternal.

Heaven was never offered as a hope for the Jews.
“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16) That doesn’t sound like the hope of heaven to you? And the Jews were God’s first priority.

They had no notion of ever going to heaven. In fact, when Jesus chose his apostles and others became disciples, he had a hard time trying to tell them that he was going away. They assumed that as Messiah he would establish his kingdom on earth and that they would rule with him right here. Even as he was ascending to heaven, they thought this. (Acts 1:6) It wasn't until Pentecost that the holy spirit was poured out on them that they finally understood their heavenly inheritance. This is what Paul spoke about. (1Cor 15:42-44) But not all Christians will go to heaven.....only those with "the heavenly calling" (Heb 3:1)
They were expecting the Messiah to be a warrior king who would solve all their temporal worldly problems. Those who could see the bigger picture understood his true purpose and followed him. Those who didn’t see it rejected him.

I do not see humans being taken to heaven "bodily", as ever being part of God's original purpose.

The apostle Paul said that "flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom". Spirit beings inhabit the spirit realm, so those taken to heaven leave their sinful flesh behind and are raised as Jesus was, in a new spirit body. Jesus did not go to heaven bodily. He was raised as a spirit to go back to the realm he left when he came to earth. There he said he "existed in God's form". The Bible tells is that God is a spirit, so why would Jesus return to the spirit realm as anything other than what he was before? (1 Pet 3:18)
The Incarnate Jesus is both fully human and fully divine. He came to us and departed from us the same way – in the body. His ascension was witnessed by the apostles. Why would you say that he did no go to heaven bodily, as they say he did?

Heaven was never supposed to be the destination of humans in the first place. Why would it? If God wanted us in heaven, he would have placed is there in the first place.
Are you questioning the mind of God?

If you read what you just wrote, you may just see how silly it sounds.

First of all this is a parable, not a literal story. The rich man was not said to be wicked, nor the beggar to be righteous.
A parable told by Jesus is always a literal story. The Omniscient God knows every detail of every human experience. He does not need to fabricate imaginary events to make a point.

The rich man had stepped over Lazarus when he was sick and hungry, ignoring him rather than offering any act of mercy whatever toward a fellow soul. "For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy…” (James 2:13)

The parable could not be literal because of what you stated above. Do you see Heaven and hell as being within talking distance to one another? And can a drop of water on someone's finger possibly cool the tongue of someone in a fire?
It is literal because Jesus was not talking about an event in the future, but in the past, which means it was clearly before His crucifixion. And that means it had to have taken place in Sheol. No human souls were in heaven or in hell until after Jesus died on the cross and descended to the dead to preach the gospel of salvation and then take or send them to their final respective destinations.

There is no "heaven or hell" scenario in the Bible......it was only ever "life or death". (Deut 30:19) God's ancient people were told to "choose life" by obeying their God......we are under the same obligation.
Jesus spoke about hell (which he called Gehenna) many times, but it suits Satan very well if we can be misled into believing there really is no such place. The “life or Death” in Deuteronomy is salvation and being with God in heaven or damnation and being separated from Him in hell.
 

Deidre

Well-Known Member
Ok, I'll play. ^_^
If you actually believe the Bible to be true or literal...the Serpent (devil) told the first lie, to Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.
 

Forever_Catholic

Active Member
Wasn't the physical resurrection of Jesus' friend Lazarus in John 11 vs 11-14 a real happening ?________
Whereas the Lazarus named in the illustration or parable of Luke 16 was Not a real happening but an illustration or a parable.
Hello URAVIP2ME. These would be two different guys named Lazarus, both of them real people.

I just sent a response to JayJayDee that addresses this and maybe some of the other things you said. I can't spend any more time on the PC right now, but I'll get back to it.
 

JayJayDee

Avid JW Bible Student
“Saved” means having salvation; receiving the sanctifying grace necessary to enter heaven. We are being saved from eternal damnation.

Since "heaven or hell" were never held out as opposite destinations for Adam, don't you think it would have been remiss of God not to warn him of the possibilities of these outcomes? Yet no mention is made of any afterlife at all for Adam. He is said to have simply gone back to where he came from.

Since Adam was responsible for the death of the entire human race, (Rom 5:12) and since there is not one statement of remorse or a single sacrifice offered to God by him in repentance, would Adam have gone to "hell" in your way of reckoning? He was perfect originally without the defect of sin, so he had no excuse for what he did. So where did Adam go? Where did God say he went?

There would be no point in living on earth forever.

If that was the case, then why put humans here with everything needed to live forever (including the tree of life) and then take them away from paradise here to another paradise, there? That makes no sense. Angels were not previously humans and they were created to dwell in heaven with God. Adam was never told that he would go to heaven....ever.

Jesus made plenty of references to eternal life, none of which were ever misunderstood to mean eternal life on earth. Even the earth itself is not eternal.

There is technically no such thing as "eternal" life. Only one being in existence is "eternal" in the true sense of the word. It means "no beginning and no end". "Everlasting" life, on the other hand, has a beginning but not necessarily an end. The earth also had a beginning. And the Bible says it isn't going anywhere. Why should it? Its perfect.

The reason why Jesus spoke about everlasting life is because after man's fall into sin, life became limited by sin. Only during his ministry on earth did Jesus choose a specific number of humans to join him in heaven to share in rulership over the earth. The kingdom that Jesus told us to pray for is a governmental arrangement in heaven designed to specifically undo all the damage inflicted by Adam's decision to disobey his God.

The ones ruling in that kingdom are specially chosen for that assignment....."but they will be priests of God and of the Christ, and they will rule as kings with him for the 1,000 years." (Rev 20:6) They alone have "the heavenly calling" (Heb 3:1)

Everlasting life is not the same as immortality. There is a big difference. Humans can live everlastingly in the flesh under the right conditions, but immortal spirits are literally indestructible. "Mortal" doesn't mean a creature HAS to die....it only means that they CAN. Since angels can also be destroyed, it means that they are not immortal either, yet they can live forever.

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16) That doesn’t sound like the hope of heaven to you?

No, it doesn't. That is because there are two "hopes" held out to humankind. The ones resurrected to heavenly life are said to experience the "first resurrection" which naturally means that another resurrection is to follow. Jesus spoke about these ones in John 5:28, 29. Jesus calls these ones from their graves, which means that the dead are all still in them. They are called out to life on earth under the rulership of his kingdom. (Rev 21:2-5)

And the Jews were God’s first priority.

The Jews fulfilled a role....their lineage produced the Messiah. But their conduct all through their history was one of relying on God's end of the bargain, whilst failing to live up to their part. Jesus himself pronounced sentenced upon them. (Matt 23:37-39)

The apostle Paul then spoke of a new nation, the one with whom Jesus made a new covenant. "The Israel of God" (Gal 6:16) was not exclusively "Jewish" according to the flesh, but "Jewish" according to God's adopting them as "sons". This new nation, made up of both Jewish and gentile Christians, then became Christ's "brothers" and it was for supporting these ones in their assignment that the sheep are rewarded, in Jesus' judgment between the sheep and the goats.

They were expecting the Messiah to be a warrior king who would solve all their temporal worldly problems. Those who could see the bigger picture understood his true purpose and followed him. Those who didn’t see it rejected him.

Why were they expecting Jesus to be the liberator they so desperately needed to free them from Roman oppression?

Because it was in their prophesies that he would do this.....just not at that time. They were so busy thinking about themselves that they, as a nation under poor leadership, missed the point of his entire ministry.

And you are right, those who put faith in Jesus understood his role, but not fully at that time. (Acts 1:6) At Pentecost, the holy spirit revealed it all to them and anointed them for life in heaven.

The Incarnate Jesus is both fully human and fully divine.

Yes he was fully man but he was not God incarnate. His divinity meant that he was god-like because he was a divine creation of his Father. (Col 1:15, 16; Rev 3:14) There is not one scripture stating that Jesus is God Almighty. Jesus never said it and God never said it.

He came to us and departed from us the same way – in the body. His ascension was witnessed by the apostles. Why would you say that he did no go to heaven bodily, as they say he did?

Read the scriptures again. The angel said that Jesus would come again "in the same manner", not in the same body.
What was the manner of his departure? It was not witnessed by the world at large, but only by his closest companions. He did not dematerialize until he was covered by a cloud which hid him from their view. Only then did he return to heaven.

Are you questioning the mind of God?

No, just reasoning on the scriptures as we are encouraged to do. The whole of scripture tells the story, not just selected bits of it read from a mistaken notion given to us by others. Examining the scripture with fresh eyes reveals a lot.

A parable told by Jesus is always a literal story.

Jesus' parables were always about real scenarios. Otherwise the people would not have been able to relate to them.
Putting names to the characters in them didn't make them real stores about real people. Lazarus was a common name back then.

The Omniscient God knows every detail of every human experience. He does not need to fabricate imaginary events to make a point.

Neither do we but we use illustrations ourselves from time to time. Who isn't struck by a good comparison? Jesus knew that illustrations are a great teaching tool.

The rich man had stepped over Lazarus when he was sick and hungry, ignoring him rather than offering any act of mercy whatever toward a fellow soul. "For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy…” (James 2:13)

It is literal because Jesus was not talking about an event in the future, but in the past, which means it was clearly before His crucifixion. And that means it had to have taken place in Sheol.

And to Jesus' Jewish audience, Sheol was the grave where there is no conscious existence. (Eccl 9:5, 10)
How does one in an unconscious state speak and reason? It is clear that Sheol here is a metaphor. Just as Jesus used death as a metaphor many times.

No human souls were in heaven or in hell until after Jesus died on the cross and descended to the dead to preach the gospel of salvation and then take or send them to their final respective destinations.

There is no Biblical reference for this. If you read the scripture, you will see that the "spirits in prison" were the rebellious angels who were responsible for the wickedness in Noah's day.....not the dead of mankind. The Bible does not teach that we have an immortal soul that departs from the body at death. That is a platonic Greek idea that infiltrated Christianity during the foretold apostasy.

Jesus spoke about hell (which he called Gehenna) many times, but it suits Satan very well if we can be misled into believing there really is no such place.

Again, Jesus' Jewish audience knew exactly what "Gehenna" was. It wasn't a place of eternal conscious fiery torment....it was Jerusalem's garbage dump just outside the city walls. The carcasses of dead animals and bodies of executed criminals were cast into the flames for destruction. What the fire missed, the maggots finished off. To a Jew, that destiny meant no burial tomb...no final resting place with the family name and lineage inscribed. To them it meant that God would not remember them in the coming resurrection. It was a symbol of everlasting death....which is the proper opposite of everlasting life.

Translating "Gehenna" as "hell" is very misleading. Neither Gehenna nor hades have everlasting torture attached to them.

The “life or Death” in Deuteronomy is salvation and being with God in heaven or damnation and being separated from Him in hell.
No such scenario was ever held out to the Jews, or to the Christians. Jesus never taught such a repugnant thing.

Obedience means life....disobedience means death. It was always that simple. Christendom made it hopelessly complicated and had to invent places for disembodied spirits to go. The truth is, there are no disembodied spirits of the dead that go anywhere. Either we are alive....or we are "sleeping in death" as the Bible says. The good and the bad all go to the same place as the animals when they die. (Eccles 3:19, 20) Death is death....not another form of life.

You need to understand what resurrection meant to a Jew. (John 11: 23, 24)
 

JayJayDee

Avid JW Bible Student
And, frankly...Adam and Eve never lied. Passing blame onto each other isn't lying, it's being human. Just my thoughts on it, anyway.

Yes, you are right. Passing the buck isn't lying, but is definitely a trait of sinful humans. Who wants to accept blame for doing the wrong thing? That takes humility and that is a characteristic sadly lacking in today's world. :(
 

Deidre

Well-Known Member
Yes, you are right. Passing the buck isn't lying, but is definitely a trait of sinful humans. Who wants to accept blame for doing the wrong thing? That takes humility and that is a characteristic sadly lacking in today's world. :(

But, maybe they were so startled that they were tricked? I don't personally believe anymore in ''satan,'' but I believe in being deceived by someone, and being startled by that realization. Now dismissing A&E's actions, but they shouldn't be held to such a high standard when they didn't understand the standard to begin with.
 

JayJayDee

Avid JW Bible Student
But, maybe they were so startled that they were tricked? I don't personally believe anymore in ''satan,'' but I believe in being deceived by someone, and being startled by that realization. Now dismissing A&E's actions, but they shouldn't be held to such a high standard when they didn't understand the standard to begin with.

Putting Adam and his wife on a par with present day humans doesn't excuse them. What God created was without defect. That means that they had perfect reasoning ability and no sinful nature to lead them down a wrong path.
They made choices in full knowledge of what they were doing. This is proven by the fact that there was no remorse expressed by either of them. They knew what the penalty was, but disobeyed anyway. They understood perfectly.

The first humans had mental intelligence and moral capacity beyond our ability to imagine.
God had educated Adam for a very long time before he ever formed the woman and brought her to him as a mate.
It was Adam''s job to educate his wife, which for all intents and purposes, he was doing. She knew the rules and the consequences for disobeying them.

It was when the woman was alone that the devil approached her and rather than speak as the cherub he was appointed to be in the garden, he used the snake to do his dirty work. As one not fully educated, I presume that she thought talking snakes were not beyond God's capacity to create. In any case, the devil knew his target from constant observation....and it wasn't the woman. His target all along was the man. He was sure that he could get to the man through his affection for his wife. This is why it says that sin entered into the world through the man and not the woman. (Rom 5:12)

The woman was deceived, but Adam wasn't. It was his willful and deliberate action that caused all of his offspring to be born with the same defect that they both gained from their course of disobedience. If Adam had not accepted the offer of the fruit from his wife, then a completely different outcome may have taken place, but now because both of them became sinful, there was no hope for their children until God stepped in with a solution....a long range plan to get everything back to square one and to keep free will as the gift it was meant to be.

And as the end result, God has managed to vindicate his position as universal sovereign...not by exercising his power, which would have been meaningless......but by using his wisdom. The outcome of this object lesson is so far teaching that no human or angel will ever dare repeat this scenario for the rest of eternity.

When the lesson is over, at the end of the 1,000 year reign of Christ, all things will return to the way it was in the beginning. Life and peace and harmony will be restored in the universe....the rebels will have been dispatched and only those who want to obey God will be in existence.

Humans can then get on with the task of making this earth into the paradise that God intended it to be in the first place.

Maybe God has plans for the whole universe to be inhabited? The sky is literally the limit, but the prospect of abusing free will had to be sorted first.
 
Last edited:

Forever_Catholic

Active Member
Yes he was fully man but he was not God incarnate. His divinity meant that he was god-like because he was a divine creation of his Father. (Col 1:15, 16; Rev 3:14) There is not one scripture stating that Jesus is God Almighty. Jesus never said it and God never said it.

Here are just some of them:

John 1:-2 - "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God." The “Word” is the Incarnate Word; the Word made flesh; Jesus

John 8:58 - "Jesus said to them, Truly, truly, I say unto you, before Abraham was, I am."

John 10:30 -"I and my Father are one."

John 14:9 - "… Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father…"

Matthew 28:19 - "Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost."

In “baptizing them in the name of…,” note that “name” is singular. That’s because there are three persons in one God; God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit. This is the Trinity, in which you evidently don’t believe because you don’t believe that Jesus is God.

If you can’t accept the Trinity, the Central Mystery of Faith, then you won’t get anything right about Christianity because everything else flows from this one fundamental truth. You're not understanding scripture.
 

Forever_Catholic

Active Member
You are Roman Catholic, eh? I was most of my life. Are you a 'cradle Catholic?' (just curious)
Deidre, I am a convert. I was raised in various Protestant churches, but never felt like a Protestant and never got the answers to questions that were most important to me until I found that all the truth is in the Church that Christ established.

It wouldn't surprise me if I were to learn that you got much more out of Catholicism than you realize. I have noticed that a lot of cradle Catholics have understandings about the faith that they underestimate. What they may think of as simple, unarticulated understandings that are actually quite profound.

I hope you might someday consider coming back home.
 

JayJayDee

Avid JW Bible Student
Here are just some of them:

John 1:-2 - "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God." The “Word” is the Incarnate Word; the Word made flesh; Jesus

John 8:58 - "Jesus said to them, Truly, truly, I say unto you, before Abraham was, I am."

John 10:30 -"I and my Father are one."

John 14:9 - "… Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father…"

Matthew 28:19 - "Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost."

In “baptizing them in the name of…,” note that “name” is singular. That’s because there are three persons in one God; God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit. This is the Trinity, in which you evidently don’t believe because you don’t believe that Jesus is God.

On all the "Is Jesus God?" threads, all these scriptures are explained in their correct context. None of them are proof of a trinity. There is not a single direct statement from either God or his Christ that even suggests that the son is in any way equal to his superior God.

The New Catholic Encyclopedia states: “The formulation ‘one God in three Persons’ was not solidly established, certainly not fully assimilated into Christian life and its profession of faith, prior to the end of the 4th century. But it is precisely this formulation that has first claim to the title theTrinitariandogma. Among the Apostolic Fathers, there had been nothing even remotely approaching such a mentality or perspective.” (Vol. XIV, p. 299)


For John 1:1 you need to understand the meaning of "ho theos" as opposed to just "theos"

For John 8:58 Jesus was speaking about his age not his identity. This scripture is not a reference to Ex 3:14 because "I Am" was never the name of God to begin with. It is more correctly translated "I Will Become" or "I will prove to be"

Do you know how many times used the expression "I am"....he was never claiming to be Almighty God in any of them.

John 10:30. Later in John 17:21, 22, Jesus also says that his disciples may "all be one" as well. So unless you want to include all Christians in the godhead, I don't think it quite stacks up.

John 14:28, RS: “[Jesus said:] If you loved me, you would have rejoiced, because I go to the Father; for the Father is greater than I.”
How is one part of God greater than the other equal part?

John 14:9 is a reference to "like Father like son". It doesn't mean that they are one and the same being, unless of course God can be in two places at once and can pray to himself.

Matt 28: 19, 20 "in the name of" means what? If police tell you to "stop in the name of the law" what are they saying?
It means to understand what each of those roles are. There is no trinity in this statement but a reference to the Father, his created son and the administration of his power in the operation of the Holy Spirit.

If you can’t accept the Trinity, the Central Mystery of Faith, then you won’t get anything right about Christianity because everything else flows from this one fundamental truth. You're not understanding scripture.

I understand scripture very well.

But unless you understand what the foretold "great apostasy" is, you will never understand how Christendom got everything soooo wrong. The trinity is just one doctrine that blasphemes the Father and insults his faithful and subservient son. There are many more.
 
Last edited:

Forever_Catholic

Active Member
I understand scripture very well.
Hey, you did make one good point that I forgot to acknowledge earlier -- that God's eternity is forever, both past and future, because He has no beginning or end. Our eternity, or everlasting life if you prefer, is only forward from our point of origin.
 

Forever_Catholic

Active Member
The New Catholic Encyclopedia states: “The formulation ‘one God in three Persons’ was not solidly established, certainly not fully assimilated into Christian life and its profession of faith, prior to the end of the 4th century. But it is precisely this formulation that has first claim to the title theTrinitariandogma. Among the Apostolic Fathers, there had been nothing even remotely approaching such a mentality or perspective.” (Vol. XIV, p. 299)
I didn't look up this New Catholic Encyclopedia entry to formulate a response, but suspect that it refers to the first written reference to the Apostles' Creed, as Symbolum Apostolicum, in the year 390. But the creed was known and was in use long before then. It originated as the Old Roman Creed, which already existed in written form by the year 180. This creed, or “symbol,” is a shorter version of the Apostles’ Creed that was recited as a declaration of faith by those receiving Baptism in early Christianity. It states belief in God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. There are no other written records, but it would be logical that those being baptized from the very beginning acknowledged faith in the Trinity because it was in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit that the apostles were instructed to baptize.
 
Last edited:

JayJayDee

Avid JW Bible Student
I didn't look up this New Catholic Encyclopedia entry to formulate a response, but suspect that it refers to the first written reference to the Apostles' Creed, as Symbolum Apostolicum, in the year 390. But the creed was known and was in use long before then. It originated as the Old Roman Creed, which already existed in written form by the year 180. This creed, or “symbol,” is a shorter version of the Apostles’ Creed that was recited as a declaration of faith by those receiving Baptism in early Christianity. It states belief in God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. There are no other written records, but it would be logical that those being baptized from the very beginning acknowledged faith in the Trinity because it was in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit that the apostles were instructed to baptize.

Can you understand why, in much of the pagan world, trinities of gods exist in many configurations?.......and yet in the Abrahamic faiths, there is no such teaching?

If the Jews do not believe in a trinity (and never did) and Islam does not believe in a triune deity, (although they accept the teachings of Moses) then why do you think Christendom does? And why do think it took hundreds of years after Jesus and the apostles died, to make this belief into the "foundation doctrine" of the "church"?

(Please Google "pics pagan trinities" and you will see for yourself where the "threesome" originated, long before Jesus walked the earth)

Jesus was Jewish, and in his teachings we do not once see him portray himself as anything but "the son of God".

Not once will you find the expression "God the son" nor will you find "God the Holy Spirit" in any book of the Bible.

Not once will you see his mother referred to as "the Mother of God"......as if such a thing were even possible. (Google "pics ancient mother worship")

An apostasy was foretold by Jesus and his apostles and it happened just as they said....a complete falling away from the teachings of the Christ is what we see when we examine the origins of Christendom's beliefs.

The "church" that Jesus Christ established does not resemble Roman Catholicism in any way. Her disgusting conduct in the early centuries and her adopted pagan beliefs proves that she disowned Christ a long time ago. She was hungry for wealth and power and introduced Roman sun worship disguised as Christian teaching. (Again Google "pics Catholic sun worship" and you will see it clearly to this day)

Will you be celebrating Easter? Where is Easter mentioned in the Bible? Where does the name originate? Why the rabbits and eggs as symbols of this occasion? Do you know? Do you care? Does God? (2 Cor 6:14-18)

There is no excuse NOT to know where our beliefs originate. We can all do our own research on their origins.

Our love for God and our devotion to him is wasted if we place our trust in the wrong "church". Jesus said we would recognise his true disciples "by their fruits".......by what kind of people they produce. This is not just individuals within the church; by and large it is what the entirety of the church produces by way of identifying factors. What makes a church "Christian"? Surely it has to measure up to the teachings of the one they claim as their "Lord"?

What do you believe identifies Roman Catholicism as Christ's church? What convinced you that it was "the right one"?
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Hello URAVIP2ME. These would be two different guys named Lazarus, both of them real people.
I just sent a response to JayJayDee that addresses this and maybe some of the other things you said. I can't spend any more time on the PC right now, but I'll get back to it.

How can the Lazarus of the parable or illustration of Luke 16 be a real person ?
Who were the rich men of Luke 16:1, and Luke 16:19 ?
Doesn't Matthew 13:34 say that without a parable ( an illustrative story ) Jesus would Not speak to the crowds.
Jesus was Not addressing his disciples at Luke 16:14 but collectively addressing the Pharisees who loved riches in verse 19.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Hey, you did make one good point that I forgot to acknowledge earlier -- that God's eternity is forever, both past and future, because He has no beginning or end. Our eternity, or everlasting life if you prefer, is only forward from our point of origin.

God is from everlasting - Psalm 90:2; 89:2 Douay - meaning of course God is forever both past and future. No beginning, No end.
As we can always count forwards and backwards without end.
According to the Apocalypse or Revelation 1:5; 3:14 B Jesus is the beginning of the creation of God.
So then, only God was before the beginning. The pre-human Jesus was Not before the beginning as God was before the beginning.
For Adam, and the majority of mankind, everlasting life is only forward from our point of origin.
Adam has No pre-human life. Adam's ' point of origin ' was earth. Adam was only offered everlasting life on earth if obedient to God.
A faithful Adam would still be alive on earth today gaining everlasting life right here on earth.
The majority of mankind, starting with the humble ' sheep ' of Matthew 25:31,32, will be part of the humble meek who will inherit the earth forever as per Psalm 36:11,29 Douay or Psalm 37:11,29 in connection to Jesus' promise at Matthew 5:4 Douay, or Matthew 5:5
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Here are just some of them:
John 1:-2 - "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God." The “Word” is the Incarnate Word; the Word made flesh; Jesus
John 8:58 - "Jesus said to them, Truly, truly, I say unto you, before Abraham was, I am."
John 10:30 -"I and my Father are one."
John 14:9 - "… Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father…"
Matthew 28:19 - "Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost."
In “baptizing them in the name of…,” note that “name” is singular. That’s because there are three persons in one God; God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit. This is the Trinity, in which you evidently don’t believe because you don’t believe that Jesus is God.
If you can’t accept the Trinity, the Central Mystery of Faith, then you won’t get anything right about Christianity because everything else flows from this one fundamental truth. You're not understanding scripture.

Yes, in the beginning was the Word - Genesis 1:26. According to Psalms God had No beginning. God is eternal
So, Only God was before the beginning. Jesus was Not before the beginning as God was before the beginning. - Rev. 1:5; 3:14 B
The pre-human heavenly Jesus was the beginning of the creation of God. - Rev. 1:5; 3:14 B

The same Greek grammar rule applies at John 1:1 as at Acts 28:6 B.
The letter 'a' was inserted at Acts 28:6 B, whereas the letter 'a' was omitted at John 1:1
Of course the pre-human heavenly Jesus was before Abraham. Jesus was first born of every creature - Colossians 1:15
Jesus prayed in his Lord's prayer of John chapter 17 that his followers be one just as he and his Father were one.
Please notice John 17 verses 11,20,21,22
Surely Jesus was Not praying they all be God. However, they could be one in purpose, goal, faith, unity, belief, agreement, etc.
Doesn't John 14:28 say ' the Father is greater than Jesus ' ?_______
What did John write to us at John 1:18 but that 'No one at any time has seen God'. People saw Jesus
What did John write to us at John 6:46 but that Not anyone has seen the Father except Jesus
What did John write to us at 1st John 4:12 but that ' No one has ever seen God '. People saw Jesus.
Isn't what John wrote in harmony with Exodus 33:20 that No man sees God and still lives ?_______People saw Jesus and lived.

When we hear " In the name of the Law " we know that in Not a specific person's name.
Please notice Douay Numbers 11:17,25 because God's spirit is Not in the masculine but in the neuter " it".
Even in English we hear about a neuter car or a neuter ship being referred to as 'she' although a neuter.
Psalm 103:30 Douay, or 104:30, mentions when God sends forth his spirit. His spirit as in His divine creative power - Isaiah 40:26
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
And, frankly...Adam and Eve never lied. Passing blame onto each other isn't lying, it's being human. Just my thoughts on it, anyway.
:)

I notice at Genesis 3: 9 to 11 the Lord God is speaking to Adam.
Adam replies to God in verse 12 that the woman you (God) gave me..... Adam definitely was Not blaming Eve, but blaming God.
When God is then speaking to Eve in verse 13 then Eve says to God the serpent was to blame.
Adam blamed God, Eve blamed Satan.
 
Top