Sheldon
Veteran Member
You have no objective evidence Jesus said anything.I believe tht shows why the B man is not from God. Jesus never mentioned attributes. The B man conjured that.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You have no objective evidence Jesus said anything.I believe tht shows why the B man is not from God. Jesus never mentioned attributes. The B man conjured that.
I believe there is no way to prove whether the Bab was or was not Elijah. The way I figure it is that the B man wanted to appear to be like Jesus so he drummed up the Bab to be his Elijah. That is also a decpeption.
I never denied saying that so what is your problem?
This is circular reasoning,TransmutingSoul.The Message of the Bab proves that your words are hollow echoes of unjust self based thoughts. Your thoughts, without the knowledge of the Bab's Message, are a self imposed deception.
This is circular reasoning,TransmutingSoul.
Yes the Lamb is mentioned a lot in Revelation. And how is it that Baha'is interpret the "Lamb" as the Bab? Where in the Baha'i writing does it say this?This Lamb and throne of God is mentioned often in Revelation.
As usual Baha'is make claims. Can you show who was the "Elijah" to Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Buddha and Krishna? And was Elijah a manifestation of God? Was John the Baptist a manifestation of God? So, why is it that the Bab has to be a manifestation of God? 19 years and then his religion was over and done?The Message of the Bab proves that your words are hollow echoes of unjust self based thoughts. Your thoughts, without the knowledge of the Bab's Message, are a self imposed deception.
Here are a few Passages.
"...O peoples of the East and the West! Be ye fearful of God concerning the Cause of the true Joseph and barter Him not for a paltry price established by yourselves, or for a trifle of your earthly possessions, that ye may, in very truth, be praised by Him as those who are reckoned among the pious who stand nigh unto this Gate..." Bab
"We have planted the Garden of the Bayán [i.e., His Revelation] in the name of Him Whom God will make manifest, and have granted you permission to live therein until the time of His manifestation; .."
"...At the time of the appearance of Him Whom God will make manifest the most distinguished among the learned and the lowliest of men shall both be judged alike. How often the most insignificant of men have acknowledged the truth, while the most learned have remained wrapt in veils..." Bab
Regards Tony
Yes the Lamb is mentioned a lot in Revelation. And how is it that Baha'is interpret the "Lamb" as the Bab? Where in the Baha'i writing does it say this?
That is what I said.No problem here, Tb.
You said that only MrB had authority to interpret those records.
Then you said that MrB said that He had the authority to interpret those records.
Is it "You said" or "MrB. said"?
Ramakrishna - WikipediaIn order to distinguish the true Messengers from the false prophets we need some kind of criteria.
The following criteria are my criteria which is based upon who I believe were Messengers of God, who met all these criteria. My criteria narrow the playing field and it will eliminate the false prophets, since they will fail to meet the criteria.
The minimum criteria would be:
1. He had good character as exemplified by his qualities such as love, mercy, kindness, truth, justice, benevolence, gracious, merciful, righteous, forgiving, patient.
2. He believed he had been given a mission by God and did everything he could to see that it was carried out. He was completely successful before his death, and he accomplished everything that he set out to do.
3. He wrote much about God and God's purpose for humans both individually and collectively, or scriptures were written by others who spoke for him. He firmly believed that the work he was doing was for the Cause of God.
4. He had many followers while he was alive, and there are still millions who follow his teachings and gather in groups based on the religion he founded.
5. His followers have grown more numerous in recent times.
This is a starting point but there are other questions we would want to ask ourselves before we would be able to believe that a man was a true Messenger of God because that is a bold claim so there should be a lot of evidence to support such a claim.
Another criterion I believe a true Messenger of God would have to meet is that his religion could not contradict or be in opposition to any of the world religions that are already established and he could not talk down any of those religions and say his religion is the only true religion from God.
Are you saying he meets my criteria?
Yes, it seems so.Are you saying he meets my criteria?
It does not seem so to me. He was no Messenger of God, he was a guru.Yes, it seems so.
Right. So Mr B. did not say that he had authority to interpret those records.That is what I said.
Is this something you 'know' or something you believe?It does not seem so to me. He was no Messenger of God, he was a guru.
He was regarded as an avatar.It does not seem so to me. He was no Messenger of God, he was a guru.
Yes, I know that is a belief of many Hindus.He was regarded as an avatar.
No, He did not say that directly, but He did say the Representative of God among men is the authority, and since Baha'u'llah was the Representative of God among men, that means He had the authority to interpret those records.Right. So Mr B. did not say that he had authority to interpret those records.
It is something I believe.Is this something you 'know' or something you believe?