Sheldon
Veteran Member
No... your position is unsupportable. Try again.
Not my position, you created a ludicrous straw man, I tried to help you understand this with a counter example, until you grasp that fact you're just thrashing about meaninglessly.
Go and learn what reductio ad absurdum fallacies are, then go back and acknowledge you created one with a ludicrous straw man. If you can learn and understand that much you might be on the path to actually debating the topic for once.
You don't leave you door open and you don't leave your borders open.
Repeating your straw man doesn't make it any less irrational a response to my questions, that you have again ignored, but then everyone knows by now that you never ever answer questions. What's amusing is you think your bad faith evasion is "smashing the debate out of the park" when they're simply embarrassing.
Go back re-read your claims, I made none, and then note the questions addressed to those claims:
1. Do terrorist tend to be foiled by strict immigration policies then?
2. Or is this all too easy and emotive trope a rather lazy ruse to disguise the prejudice of the real target?
I'll waste my time and give you a helping nudge, this is nothing to do with current border policies in the US, it's about the generic tropes extremists like yourself use to misrepresent rhetoric as fact.