• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why are there still Monkeys?

Bunyip

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
ScuzManiac said:
Congratulations on flip flopping around what I've said.

:clap

Now that that's out of the way....

What does what the planet looked like 3.7 billion years ago have to do with humans?
Click to expand...

It is relevant because that is when our ancestors emerged. The first life formed in the oceans 3.7 billion years ago and we descend from those first life forms.
I want a REAL source or piece of evidence that says we came from water.

I'll wait.
Click to expand...

What was wrong with the citation I gave? It is a standard textbook used all over the world.
 
ScuzManiac

ScuzManiac

Active Member
Bunyip said:
It is relevant because that is when our ancestors emerged. The first life formed in the oceans 3.7 billion years ago and we descend from those first life forms.

What was wrong with the citation I gave? It is a standard textbook used all over the world.
Click to expand...

The Bible is used all over the world as well.

:eek:

outhouse said:
We evolved from water, its not up for debate.


Life started in shallow oceans
Click to expand...

What does that have to do with that quote?

He said he couldn't understand the other person's argument.

And I'm not disputing the fact that life (life, not apes that got out and lost their fur) started in some form of water (I stated this earlier)...

I just said that it has NOTHING to do with the salt content in our bodies.
 
Last edited:
Bunyip

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
ScuzManiac said:
The Bible is used all over the world as well.

:eek:
Click to expand...

So what? You're not making sense buddy.
What does that have to do with that quote?

He said he couldn't understand the other person's argument.

And I'm not disputing the fact that life (life, not apes that got out and lost their fur) started in some form of water (I stated this earlier)...

I just said that it has NOTHING to do with the salt content in our bodies.
Click to expand...

Then what are you disputing? I was talking about life, not some primate magically transforming from a sea creature into a monkey.
 
ScuzManiac

ScuzManiac

Active Member
Bunyip said:
So what? You're not making sense buddy.


Then what are you disputing? I was talking about life, not some primate magically transforming from a sea creature into a monkey.
Click to expand...

1. Or maybe you are just failing to comprehend what I said.

You posted a book as a source. I said it wasn't a good source.

You said "but but but it's used all over the world."

The Bible is used all over the world as well (and as a teaching tool).

Should we just refer to The Bible when we want to know something?

2. My argument was and still is...

WHY are we so focused on the salt content in our bodies.

It has NOTHING to do with the fact that life as we know it came from water.

I don't see why that is such a tough question to answer.
 
Bunyip

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
ScuzManiac said:
1. Or maybe you are just failing to comprehend what I said.

You posted a book as a source. I said it wasn't a good source.

You said "but but but it's used all over the world."

The Bible is used all over the world as well (and as a teaching tool).

Should we just refer to The Bible when we want to know something?
Click to expand...

I referred you to a solid and reliable textbook on the topic in hand - in response you start bablbing about the bible.
2. My argument was and still is...

WHY are we so focused on the salt content in our bodies.
Click to expand...

Who is 'we'? I don't think anyone is 'focussed on salt content', what are you even talking about?
It has NOTHING to do with the fact that life as we know it came from water.
Click to expand...


Of course it does - the salt content of our bodies is a direct result of the fact that our ancestors evolved in the oceans.

I don't see why that is such a tough question to answer.[/QUOTE]
 
Thief

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Bunyip said:
I referred you to a solid and reliable textbook on the topic in hand - in response you start bablbing about the bible.

Who is 'we'? I don't think anyone is 'focussed on salt content', what are you even talking about?


Of course it does - the salt content of our bodies is a direct result of the fact that our ancestors evolved in the oceans.

I don't see why that is such a tough question to answer.
Click to expand...
[/QUOTE]

So now we change the title of this thread to.....'why are there fish in salt water?'
 
ScuzManiac

ScuzManiac

Active Member
Bunyip said:
I referred you to a solid and reliable textbook on the topic in hand - in response you start bablbing about the bible.

Who is 'we'? I don't think anyone is 'focussed on salt content', what are you even talking about?


Of course it does - the salt content of our bodies is a direct result of the fact that our ancestors evolved in the oceans.
Click to expand...

Talk about illegible...

:facepalm:

The reason I mentioned The Bible? Because popularity does NOT equal validity...

Who is we? The 3-4 people in this thread that have only mentioned salt content and none of the other minerals that match humans/ocean water.

The salt content of our bodies is NOT a direct result of that fact. Again, source?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top