• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why Are You Not an Atheist?

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
How does your "theological thinking" compare with the rest of Christendom's clergy?
Right down the middle.

You seem to be out of sinc with most of them
Nah. Some maybe. But not “most” by a long shot. But what would you know? You know little enough about Christianity, such that you constantly berate it as bein “wrong” when you can’t even back up your arguments with decent theology.

why do you post as if Christendom's theologians are somehow your allies
Because many of them are.
Your beliefs clash with theirs, so I am always confused by your use of their institutions, information and definitions
No. They don’t.

I can't imagine why I need a theological dictionary to define something that is mine and mine alone
I don’t think you have the capability for much imagination with regard to anything theological. You simply regurgitate what someone has told you. I haven’t seen one original theological idea, or, in fact, any indication of any deep theological thought or consideration in your posts. Your posts are street corner religious tracts. Only with worse theology.
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
Right down the middle.

Is that where left of center is? :shrug:

But what would you know? You know little enough about Christianity, such that you constantly berate it as bein “wrong” when you can’t even back up your arguments with decent theology.

No, I admit that 'theology' is not my thing....I'd rather rely on the Bible. You can rely on whomever you wish. Theology is something taught by humans and believed by them. The Pharisees had theology but they didn't have the truth. Jesus rejected them and their teachings.

Because many of them are.

I haven't met any....and I have had many conversations with clergymen. None of the ones I have spoken to are even remotely close to what you believe. Perhaps your church is only to be found in the US? Does it have an Australian branch?...just in case I run into one of your brethren in my travels?

I don’t think you have the capability for much imagination with regard to anything theological.

Hmmmm. "Theology" is defined as...."
the study of the nature of God and religious belief....

  • religious beliefs and theory when systematically developed."
I have no interest in religious beliefs based on what an apostate church formulated centuries after Christ died. A "degree in theology" means nothing to God...it only means something to those already enveloped in that "system". I got out of it decades ago.

You simply regurgitate what someone has told you.

Again that made me laugh out loud....this is not something you do, of course....

I haven’t seen one original theological idea, or, in fact, any indication of any deep theological thought or consideration in your posts. Your posts are street corner religious tracts. Only with worse theology.

That would probably be because we stick to what Jesus taught, which doesn't allow for excursions into ones own ideas. (2 John 8-11) Our beliefs will stand the test of being able to be backed up by everything Jesus taught....I don't think you can do that without a lot of tap dancing outside of it....and BTW, those tracts have been the catalyst to people searching for the truth. You would be amazed at how many Bible studies started with the information on one of those tracts.

What does your church do to fulfill the "great commission" as some like to call it? (Matthew 28:19-20) Since the preaching work that Jesus assigned was to be carried out right to the end of the present system of things, I am wondering when Christendom will begin taking that commission seriously? (Matthew 24:14)
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Is that where left of center is? :shrug:



No, I admit that 'theology' is not my thing....I'd rather rely on the Bible. You can rely on whomever you wish. Theology is something taught by humans and believed by them. The Pharisees had theology but they didn't have the truth. Jesus rejected them and their teachings.



I haven't met any....and I have had many conversations with clergymen. None of the ones I have spoken to are even remotely close to what you believe. Perhaps your church is only to be found in the US? Does it have an Australian branch?...just in case I run into one of your brethren in my travels?



Hmmmm. "Theology" is defined as...."
the study of the nature of God and religious belief....

  • religious beliefs and theory when systematically developed."
I have no interest in religious beliefs based on what an apostate church formulated centuries after Christ died. A "degree in theology" means nothing to God...it only means something to those already enveloped in that "system". I got out of it decades ago.



Again that made me laugh out loud....this is not something you do, of course....



That would probably be because we stick to what Jesus taught, which doesn't allow for excursions into ones own ideas. (2 John 8-11) Our beliefs will stand the test of being able to be backed up by everything Jesus taught....I don't think you can do that without a lot of tap dancing outside of it....and BTW, those tracts have been the catalyst to people searching for the truth. You would be amazed at how many Bible studies started with the information on one of those tracts.

What does your church do to fulfill the "great commission" as some like to call it? (Matthew 28:19-20) Since the preaching work that Jesus assigned was to be carried out right to the end of the present system of things, I am wondering when Christendom will begin taking that commission seriously? (Matthew 24:14)
You seriously need a life. Goading everyone who disagrees with you can’t be all that fulfilling. Katzpur was right: your posts belie your poor attitude. You can’t argue theologically, so you spout meaningless bible verses you’ve managed to misinterpret and claim all the while that you somehow have this magical “understanding” which everyone else can see is simply unavailable to you.

What a wonderful witness for God you have going on here! “Winning the lost to Jehovah through sarcasm and bullying.”
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
You seriously need a life. Goading everyone who disagrees with you can’t be all that fulfilling.

After reading what you have written to others, are you kidding me? seriously....:facepalm: This is all you have left?

Debating is what is done in this forum...if you just want people to agree with you, why are you here? If you cannot defend what you believe then you know the old saying.....stay out of the kitchen. o_O
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
After reading what you have written to others, are you kidding me? seriously....:facepalm: This is all you have left?

Debating is what is done in this forum...if you just want people to agree with you, why are you here? If you cannot defend what you believe then you know the old saying.....stay out of the kitchen. o_O
Yeah you tried that tack with another poster, and it didn’t work then either. A debate is based on some mutually-agreed upon standards of reference. You’re unwilling to acknowledge anyone who is recognized as an expert in ecclesiology, theology, exegesis, or any other scholastic discipline. That conveniently throws every shred of real evidence out the window. You insist on “biblical proof,” when what you really mean is “what I think the scriptures say.” IOW, you want to force everyone to play a game you’ve rigged. You don’t want to debate. You want to create the rules of some ego game and then force everyone into your playpen. You won’t accept any standards that you, yourself don’t set. A debate is fair. You don’t want to play fair, and then you try to bully everyone into playing with you.

Yes. Debating is what’s done in this forum. You’re not debating. You’re goading.
We can defend what we believe, but not through your fairytale criteria. If you can’t accept scholarship, you don’t belong in a scholastic debate. You belong in the intellectual kiddie pool.
 

osgart

Nothing my eye, Something for sure
I do not see that any human has a monopoly on definitive explanation of reality. People sure do get satisfied on either science or religious logic and inference. Everyone is high on their so called evidences, but its all fallible human inference. In terms of usefulness to practical everyday things, science is extremely reliable. But in the land of ultimate questions we are all bankrupt. Usefulness is not definitive explanation.

That life is the result of mindless natural processes alone is an assumption. People are satisfied with the conclusion, yet no one publishes definitive proof, or evidence that this is the case. And anything discoverable will always qualify as natural process. But the question of intelligence creating nature is not proveable, or disproveable. The question of whether or not mindless natural causes alone is responsible for life is untestable as well.

All these debates are phantoms. I mean no one has written a book that disproves intelligence as a cause in nature for life.

Its very logical to infer that intelligence must preexist for anything intelligent to form. And it could very well be right. The appearance of human beings strongly suggests that intelligence is responsible for such highly multifunctional purposeful functional bodies, and minds.

I dont need science nor religion to reach that conclusion. Anything intelligent is intelligently done. Nothing has to be ideal or perfect or complex for it to be of intellect, but it does have to be something functional, and purposeful in its form and use.

I am quite happy with that standard of reasoning. Everything else i have seen to the contrary glazes over this observation and appearance in nature.

That dawkins video glazes over the intelligibility seen in the form and function of living creatures to make an impression of mindless slow gradual becoming.

The only reason i am atheist, is that nothing in the world is perfect or ideal and far from it. Certainly it is not carefully designed. But the world has got intelligent forms and functions equivalent to writing the english alphabet, and that must mean that intelligence is a natural process in nature. The slightest touch of purpose in the form and function of a living body smacks of intellect.

So people will just have to get used to millions of people thinking this way, and believing this way.
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
Yeah you tried that tack with another poster, and it didn’t work then either. A debate is based on some mutually-agreed upon standards of reference. You’re unwilling to acknowledge anyone who is recognized as an expert in ecclesiology, theology, exegesis, or any other scholastic discipline. That conveniently throws every shred of real evidence out the window.

Are you playing the victim now? o_O

I think it is good to remember that when Jesus began his ministry, he also encountered the same situation as we have today. Unfaithful and unscrupulous men with religious 'credentials' were leading the people astray because they had added to the word of God and made their religious practices into something that God never commanded and his son never taught. They too had centuries to entrench their ideas in the minds of the people. Jesus did not have a good word to say about them. God did not send him to those religious leaders, but to the "lost sheep" who went astray under their negligent shepherding. He already knew that the Jewish system was beyond repair. John the Baptist knew it too. (Matthew 3:7-10)

Jesus warned that the same thing would happen again with "weeds" planted by the devil. These weeds were planted "while men were sleeping" (after the apostles had gone to their graves.) And there has been a steady decline over the centuries as "Christianity" splintered into ever more bickering sects. The "wheat and the weeds" would "grow together" until it was harvest time.....I believe that we are almost there.

The Pharisees had set themselves up as teachers of the people, but instead of directing their attention to the kingdom of God, they were discouraging them by insistence on burdensome traditions. Then when Jesus exposed them for the frauds they were, they became enraged and sought to turn the people against him. Rightly Jesus said: “You shut up the kingdom of the heavens before mankind; for you yourselves do not go in, neither do you permit those on their way in to go in.” (Matthew 23:4; 13)
What does Christendom teach with regard to the kingdom of God? They don't even know how to define it.

Your insistence on quoting your "recognized" experts is to me the same as the Pharisees quoting their Talmud as if it was on the same level as the Torah.
It is as relevant to me, as my teachers would be to you. Can you not just use the Bible? Jesus did.....when his teachings were challenged he said "it is written"....and proceeded to quote his Father's word to end the discussion. Is it too much to ask that you could do the same? After all, we both claim to be Christians and all we believe should come from God's word....not from the musings of men who think they know better.

You insist on “biblical proof,” when what you really mean is “what I think the scriptures say.” IOW, you want to force everyone to play a game you’ve rigged. You don’t want to debate. You want to create the rules of some ego game and then force everyone into your playpen. You won’t accept any standards that you, yourself don’t set. A debate is fair. You don’t want to play fair, and then you try to bully everyone into playing with you.

You're feeling threatened now? :eek:

A debate is fair when it is a religious debate and you discuss each side of a religious issue. If you can't back up your side of the issue with the only information recognized by the God who wrote our instruction manual, then I personally think you are just making excuses.....you must know that the Bible does not support your interpretation of matters otherwise it would be no problem to use it as your only reference.

The fact that you feel the need to attack me personally is a sure sign of no defense....is that why you feel threatened...because I asked you to back up your assertions with the Bible? Well then I guess I am a terrible bully!
confused0086.gif


Tell me, what you would know about God or his Christ, without the Bible? It should be the only authority needed for a Christian to support their beliefs....shouldn't it?

Yes. Debating is what’s done in this forum. You’re not debating. You’re goading.
We can defend what we believe, but not through your fairytale criteria. If you can’t accept scholarship, you don’t belong in a scholastic debate.

Is asking for the scriptural proof of a person claiming to be a Christian too much to expect then? Its not that I don't accept scholarship...its just that I don't accept anything that comes out of Christendom's teaching institutions. Just like it was with the Pharisees, I do not believe that any truth comes out of that place. The Bible is a great leveler......because it backs up itself.

You belong in the intellectual kiddie pool.

Do you hear yourself. What a very mature thing to say.
confused0036.gif
Are you a worshipper of intellectualism? I'm not.
 

BilliardsBall

Veteran Member
I think that it is not in anyone's interests
for me to continue interacting with you.

This may be as good a place as any to stop,
because for once, I half way agree with you.

Only half,because you write suggesting how I
could improve, by being like you; and I suggest
how you could improve.

The half where I have to disagree is, I do not
make things up.

Maybe you will find it in yourself to cease
that odious habit. I hope you do.

Has to come from inside, tho.
I sure cant convince you.
Good luck.

For atheists on this forum, to paraphrase Bilbo Baggins, "I know half of you half as well as I should, and I like half of you half as well as you deserve."

I like you and I find your intelligence compelling, but no, I'd rather you ignore me as long as you continue to make ad homs about me, rather than engage in FACTS.
 

jonathan180iq

Well-Known Member
Have any theists made any arguments in response to this thread other than "because I've experienced something special"?
 

Audie

Veteran Member
For atheists on this forum, to paraphrase Bilbo Baggins, "I know half of you half as well as I should, and I like half of you half as well as you deserve."

I like you and I find your intelligence compelling, but no, I'd rather you ignore me as long as you continue to make ad homs about me, rather than engage in FACTS.

Amazing! You did it again, more falsehoods!

Speaking of facts, a plan to get in the last word
with a female woman is a plan bound to fail.

More-

Fact- I dont indulge in "ad homs". Plz look
up what the term means, you look silly
misusing it.

Fact-,I say you make things up because you do

Who knows-maybe you cant help it, maybe
you cant even recognize it.

Too bad for you, and your chances of
influencing anyone to respect your views.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006

1137

Here until I storm off again
Premium Member
As I summarize in my book:


"1. Empirical and Anthropological Evidence: the ability of the mind to go against nature and how it rose in the UPR.

2. Logic: something unnatural cannot arise from Nature.

3. Objections: none of the objections to gods harm the Setian position.

4. Alternatives: alternatives fail to be as accurate or encompassing as Setianism.

5. Experience: personal interactions with Set, human interactions with Gods in general."
 

jonathan180iq

Well-Known Member
As I summarize in my book:


"1. Empirical and Anthropological Evidence: the ability of the mind to go against nature and how it rose in the UPR.

2. Logic: something unnatural cannot arise from Nature.

3. Objections: none of the objections to gods harm the Setian position.

4. Alternatives: alternatives fail to be as accurate or encompassing as Setianism.

5. Experience: personal interactions with Set, human interactions with Gods in general."
Which book is that?
 

BilliardsBall

Veteran Member
Amazing! You did it again, more falsehoods!

Speaking of facts, a plan to get in the last word
with a female woman is a plan bound to fail.

More-

Fact- I dont indulge in "ad homs". Plz look
up what the term means, you look silly
misusing it.

Fact-,I say you make things up because you do

Who knows-maybe you cant help it, maybe
you cant even recognize it.

Too bad for you, and your chances of
influencing anyone to respect your views.

So... you are putting me on ignore or no? Since I'm truthful, honest on the forums, you still refuse to say, "mistaken" or "misguided" and constantly accuse me of "making things up". Right now, you are "making up" pretending to ignore me.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
So... you are putting me on ignore or no? Since I'm truthful, honest on the forums, you still refuse to say, "mistaken" or "misguided" and constantly accuse me of "making things up". Right now, you are "making up" pretending to ignore me.

There are a lot of shades of grey between night and day,
yes. Every degree of prevarication is out there to indulge in.

It may well be your impression that you are correct
that I said I would put you on ignore. I did not; you will
find that only in your imagination.

"Interact" was the word. Takes a lot of transposing
to turn that into "put on ignore".

So while you may not think you made that up, you did.
I am pretending nothing, and it is more than a little rude
to falsely so claim.

I did say something about you trying to have the last word
with a female woman. I take it back; you have the last
word, and welcome to it.
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
Tell me, what you would know about God or his Christ, without the Bible? It should be the only authority needed for a Christian to support their beliefs....shouldn't it?
.

Of course. External independent evidence from what is written in a book is useless.

In the same way, the book Pinocchio is the sole authority believers in incarnated wood puppets with long noses, and sweet blue fairies, need to refer to.

Why should they need more than that?

Ciao

- viole
 
Last edited:

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
Have any theists made any arguments in response to this thread other than "because I've experienced something special"?

I could, but I have no interest in arguing. I'll simply say that my adoption of theism was anchored in reason, education, and learning far more than mystical/divine experiences. Come to think of it, I didn't conceptualize my experiences as mystical/divine at all at the time I was wrestling with this. I couldn't have thought about things that way because I was much too ignorant about the variety of theism and theistic experiences to view it as divine.
 
Top