lukethethird
unknown member
What supposed subjectivity am I imposing onto anyone by stating that I don't want religion imposed onto me?Or your subjectivity onto me or in reverse. How do we do that?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What supposed subjectivity am I imposing onto anyone by stating that I don't want religion imposed onto me?Or your subjectivity onto me or in reverse. How do we do that?
What supposed subjectivity am I imposing onto anyone by stating that I don't want religion imposed onto me?
What exactly am I subjective about by stating that I don't want religion imposed onto me?None. but you are still in part subjective, right? I am at least, so we need common norms.
He said, "I don't accept religion nor should I be expected to." He's telling you he won't dance to any religion's tune, and he doesn't need luck with that for now, although I would add 'assuming that he's not American.' Americans have to dance to the Christian tune there now, where people are arrested for abortions or wearing drag in public.You think the world should dance to your tune? Good luck with that.
Agreed. Now that my wife and I have no living parents remaining, we have no reason to return there (I have almost no living family and the in-laws mostly are Chrisitan Trumpers that don't approve of us nor we them). And you probably aren't surprised to know that about half of the American expats I live near feel the same about visiting their homeland.Wouldn’t live there [America] for all the tea in China
Same here in our little expat retirement enclave in Mexico. We've seen a significant influx of expats moving here in the last few years and we have a traffic problem now. Two major changes in the expat demographic, one for the good and one not: Young families with minor children are moving here now. For ten years, the only kids we saw were Mexican. And we're starting to see people moving here that don't want to be here but can't afford the States any longer, meaning we're getting more conservatives. Many if not most won't be happy here. My in-conservative laws would hate it.I don't want everyone living here. We have enuf people...the country is full.
Correct that I do not respect gods. They're not needed for anything in my life. My respect is for nature and mother earth, of the night sky and what it signifies, of the garden, of the miracle that is my dogs, of evenings on the terrace watching the sun set over the lake to music and wine - spirituality without spirits.activist atheists are spiritually lazy and have no respect for the creator.
Of course you see it like that. I don't mind what you or any other theist believes about gods. If my neighbor wants to dance around a tree in his back yard at midnight baying at the full moon while shaking a stick with a bloody chicken claw nailed to it in order to center himself and give his like meaning, that's fine, as long as he isn't insane, isn't sacrificing animals to his god or gods, and keeps the noise down. Why would I care?What effort they do muster is spent in attempting to undermine the faith of religious people.
Kind of like somebody proselytizing for Jesus, but on the other side.What a sorry kind of individual that is!
Atheism is neither interesting nor boring. And time spent here on RF is some of that comfort. I enjoy this.If you were truly "comfortable" then why waste time on "religious forums"? Is atheism that boring?
I am indeed lazy. Why waste time reading books whereLazy is more like it, activist atheists are spiritually lazy and have no respect for the creator.
But you spend much of your time on RF, so I think one side of your brain is manufacturing bs and the other half is buying it!I am indeed lazy. Why waste time reading books where
someone made up sky fairies? And why respect a fictional
creator, eh. I recommend that people spend less effort
convincing themselves & others that fictional deities are
real, & more time enjoying making this real world a better
place, with liberty, prosperity, & a verdant environment.
I spend little time on RF.But you spend much of you time on RF, so I think one side of your brain is manufacturing bs and the other half is buying it!
Yes, i can be weighed, measured and observedCan you prove you exist?
You start out as an exception, and further distance yourself from the pack in you exceptionalism.
Maybe. Or it may simply be peace of mind by not imagining harm to those you love, or by not imagining wanton harm at all.Yes well it was more about magical thinking than whether you believe in God or not.
Maybe the thought is that atheists connect God to magical thinking yet engage in it themselves.
Of course not. I was simply stating the case as I see it. My close friends and relatives who are believers (Christians) have had similar life paths, which I think are put in our heads by evolution ─ to everything there is a season.Are you suggesting that only those who share your perception and your beliefs, are capable of doing all the practical everyday things you’ve done? Because that clearly isn’t the case.
Of course not. I was simply stating the case as I see it. My close friends and relatives who are believers (Christians) have had similar life paths, which I think are put in our heads by evolution ─ to everything there is a season.
Though while we're on the topic, it occurs to me that as far as I know, none of those friends or relatives have children who are churchgoers, including a pair of children who went to a Christian (RC) high school.
The statistics show a decline in churchgoing all over the Western world, and I now note it's closer to me in a way that I hadn't noticed before, so thanks.
What exactly am I subjective about by stating that I don't want religion imposed onto me?
Yes, i can be weighed, measured and observed
By disproving the null hypothesis. If there were nothing or only random noise, you'd expect to not see those numbers. I.e. we know that there is something, it exists.So at the end of that process, you have a collection of numbers, each relating to a given metric. How do numbers on a page or spreadsheet prove your existence?
By disproving the null hypothesis. If there were nothing or only random noise, you'd expect to not see those numbers. I.e. we know that there is something, it exists.
How would you prove a "thing in itself" without using language?Okay. So we can prove existence mathematically. But maths is an abstraction, right? Like language is an abstraction; a description of something, but not the thing in itself.
How would you prove a "thing in itself" without using language?
Luckily hypotheses and theories are judged by testing and peer review, rather than the status of a particular theoretician.Scientific methodology notwithstanding, scientists themselves are human, and in practice often just as likely to cling tenaciously to their pet theories as any other class of humanity.
Theology seems like an attempt to convince oneself and others of a particular viewpoint. It functions as a means of social control, a justification for coercive enforcement of the status quo, suppression of minorities or dissident ideas, and, of course, for war and pillage.What do you think the function of theology is? I don't look to religion to provide an explanation of the workings of the natural world; we have the natural sciences for that, and I am certainly not anti-science. Perhaps because you're American, you assume that most religious people are Bible literalists; this is a cultural anomaly peculiar to your continent, which is most assuredly not the centre of the world.
Luckily hypotheses and theories are judged by testing and peer review, rather than the status of a particular theoretician.
Theology seems like an attempt to convince oneself and others of a particular viewpoint. It functions as a means of social control, a justification for coercive enforcement of the status quo, suppression of minorities or dissident ideas, and, of course, for war and pillage.
I agree that religion is not a good model for the workings of the natural world, but apparently many think otherwise, and are constantly trespassing into the realm of science; making assertions of fact and contradicting scientific facts and models.