Why do Atheists Debate Religion?

[viole]

Please tell me a few things.

1. What are the 20 transitional species leading whales? This I do not know existed even in books. For my enlightenment.
2. Where can I find the thousands of specimens of transitional species leading to humans? Are they complete? I would like to know.

The earliest form of evolution study I know of was called the Mohammedan theory of evolution. I know it existed before Darwin but you cant say that your argument was done and concluded with years before Darwin. The controversy is still going. There are enough and more scientists that question the theory and the validity of transitional and ancestral species while some even have new theories of evolution. So you cannot say that back in 1850 was when the actual controversy existed. What with Ruperts Alberts work? How about Albert SzentGyörgyi? No controversy? Sir Fred Hoyle? L.G Barnes? Kimamura? There are more disputes in Catacea taxons morphological charachterisation alone than disambiguation.

There is so much controversy about evolution in science as there is between the theory that children come from pregnant women and the theory that they are transported by storks.

Maybe we should teach this controversy at school as well, what do you think?

Ciao

- viole

 

[firedragon]

There is so much controversy about evolution in science as there is between the theory that children come from pregnant women and the theory that they are transported by storks.

Maybe we should teach this controversy at school as well, what do you think?

Ciao

- viole

I think you have evolved beyond my comprehension in height of stupidity.

Peace.

 

[viole]

I think you have evolved beyond my comprehension in height of stupidity.

Peace.

I think most things evolved beyond your comprehension.

War.

 

[firedragon]

I think most things evolved beyond your comprehension.

War.

No. Only my previous concern.

 

[viole]

No. Only my previous concern.

What concern?

There is no controversy in science about evolution. In the same way there is no controversy about children delivery or earth's curvature.

Ciao

- viole

 

[firedragon]

What concern?

There is no controversy in science about evolution. In the same way there is no controversy about children delivery or earth's curvature.

Ciao

- viole

Lol.

Alright. Peace.

 

[viole]

Lol.

Alright. Peace.

I forgot.

There is also no controversy in science that black stones in the desert are meteorites.

Lol.

Ciao

- viole

 

[firedragon]

I forgot.

There is also no controversy in science that black stones in the desert are meteorites.

Lol.

Ciao

- viole

There is also no controversy in science that wit is hot.

Peace.

 

[Bunyip]

Please tell me a few things.

1. What are the 20 transitional species leading whales? This I do not know existed even in books. For my enlightenment.

Just look it up. Don't play the fool, you have the internet - if your interest were honest you wouldhave looked it up.

2. Where can I find the thousands of specimens of transitional species leading to humans? Are they complete? I would like to know.

Yes there are many hundreds of complete specimens, in fact there are hundreds of specimens just for a single group - Australopithecus. Another 19 were found just at the one site where Lucy was discovered. As I said, don't play the fool and pretend to be interested in the evidence - if you were interested you would have looked it up.

The earliest form of evolution study I know of was called the Mohammedan theory of evolution. I know it existed before Darwin but you cant say that your argument was done and concluded with years before Darwin. The controversy is still going. There are enough and more scientists that question the theory and the validity of transitional and ancestral species while some even have new theories of evolution. So you cannot say that back in 1850 was when the actual controversy existed. What with Ruperts Alberts work? How about Albert SzentGyörgyi? No controversy? Sir Fred Hoyle? L.G Barnes? Kimamura? There are more disputes in Catacea taxons morphological charachterisation alone than disambiguation.

Nonsense, there are no alternative theories to evolution, and not one single element of the ToE has EVER been falsified. There is no controversy.

 

[firedragon]

Just look it up. Don't play the fool, you have the internet - if your interest were honest you wouldhave looked it up.

Don't worry, I am not playing you.
I looked it up and couldn't find.
About honesty, don't think everyone's like you.

Yes there are many hundreds of complete specimens, in fact there are hundreds of specimens just for a single group - Australopithecus. Another 19 were found just at the one site where Lucy was discovered. As I said, don't play the fool and pretend to be interested in the evidence - if you were interested you would have looked it up.

Bro, I asked the question from someone else. Not you. And don't jump the gun and I really dont have to look it up.

Nonsense, there are no alternative theories to evolution, and not one single element of the ToE has EVER been falsified. There is no controversy.

Let me try and respectfully tell you that you do not know what you are talking about.

Peace.

 

[Bunyip]

Don't worry, I am not playing you.
I looked it up and couldn't find.
About honesty, don't think everyone's like you.



Bro, I asked the question from someone else. Not you. And don't jump the gun and I really dont have to look it up.



Let me try and respectfully tell you that you do not know what you are talking about.

Peace.

It is a fact. No aspect of the ToE as we know it today has been falsified.

 

[firedragon]

It is a fact. No aspect of the ToE as we know it today has been falsified.

Alright bro. Peace.

 

[Bunyip]

Alright bro. Peace.

A scientific theory must be falsifyable to qualify as a theory, if any aspect of the ToE had been falsified - the theory must be changed.

That is the truth and you tell me that I don't know what I am talking about - clearly I know better than you on that point.

Evolution is a fact, proven long ago. If your beliefs tell you otherwise, then your belief is in error.

 

[firedragon]

A scientific theory must be falsifyable to qualify as a theory, if any aspect of the ToE had been falsified - the theory must be changed.

That is the truth and you tell me that I don't know what I am talking about - clearly I know better than you on that point.

Evolution is a fact, proven long ago. If your beliefs tell you otherwise, then your belief is in error.

Alright brother. You know better than me.

Peace.

 

[Nadia Faiazova]

Perhaps because they want to understand who stands behind the evil and cruelty in the world

 

[Jainarayan]

*** Mod Post ***

*** Thread closed for review ***​