Aye, but of all the false things, his color would be what matters least.The false part is the part about Jesus being “white”.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Aye, but of all the false things, his color would be what matters least.The false part is the part about Jesus being “white”.
Hundreds upon hundreds of black men i know of have come out of jail as Muslims. I can only think of 1 off the top of my head who became a born again Christian while locked up.
Even though the Nation of Islam is not seen as being a part of the real Islam, a lot of black men actually find their way to Islam via guys like Farrakhan and previously Malcolm X.
Why are black men turning to Islam in times of turmoil and not Christianity?
Well even 2 days ago i saw another black man who got released after doing 9 years for some drug and firearm offenses. And he had a massive beard and he even changed his first name to Abdul-Kareem and had the Qu'ran in his hand and said he was going to the mosque right then. This was a guy who grew up with strict Christian churchgoing parents.I live in the UK and at least 40 black guys that i know even in the last 2 years from memory have all become Muslim while in prison, and hundreds more over the years.
I see it in America too. Half the well known rappers became Muslim while in prison and you often hear black American men saying "Allah" instead of "God" and using Arabic language to greet each other.
I also heard many American blacks saying that Christianity is the religion of the slavemaster and they don't believe in a white Jesus so that's why they like Islam and that Islam is the real black man's religion.
Hundreds upon hundreds of black men i know of have come out of jail as Muslims. I can only think of 1 off the top of my head who became a born again Christian while locked up.
Even though the Nation of Islam is not seen as being a part of the real Islam, a lot of black men actually find their way to Islam via guys like Farrakhan and previously Malcolm X.
Why are black men turning to Islam in times of turmoil and not Christianity?
As well as they probably grew in a Christian culture and had already decided it never worked for them.
While of course there is a massive difference in scale, there are Islamic groups in the UK who are down LGBT stuff. I knew someone in Manchester who was part of Imaan, a specifically LGBT+ Islamic organisation, who would meet for prayers and reading the Qur'an etc. The Muslim Alliance for Gender and Sexual Diversity is also active here in the UK.
That's quite a dramatic sweeping statement. Can you back it up?
It's also important to note that the Muslims of today don't have slaves.Don't miss the forest (Muslim-forced slavery, the stupidity of joining Islam if you're of African heritage IMHO) for the trees (Muslims tend to believe people with Arabian features are superior to others, since Islam began in Arabia).
Nah, people just have a habit of depicting their deities as looking like them. So you have African Jesus in Africa, Asian Jesus in Asia, Latino Jesus in Latin America, etc.I believe in the bible, I believe that Christ is the son of God, and that he died for my sins.
However — it is a known fact that white colonizers changed the image of Jesus to white, changed the gospel, and used their false image of white Jesus to justify the murder, rape, enslavement, genocide, etc., of millions of innocent people on multiple continents.
Source?Christianity may be the religion of the slavemaster but Muslims introduced slavery to Christendom
That seems generally true, but this shows it's not entirely stamped out....It's also important to note that the Muslims of today don't have slaves.
I believe Muslims don't have the Holy Spirit so they are apt to fall for anything.
I've only read about two-thirds of the Qu'ran, in English, and have a Bachelor's of Religion degree, but it sounds like you are unaware of:
1) Muslim laws regarding slavery
2) I may have erred, plenty of Muslims enslaved WHITE and ASIAN people, too
Don't miss the forest (Muslim-forced slavery, the stupidity of joining Islam if you're of African heritage IMHO) for the trees (Muslims tend to believe people with Arabian features are superior to others, since Islam began in Arabia).
Nah, people just have a habit of depicting their deities as looking like them. So you have African Jesus in Africa, Asian Jesus in Asia, Latino Jesus in Latin America, etc.
Excellent, you're finally starting to catch on.God was created in the image of man. Sounds about right to me.
No, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that as a religion grows and reaches different areas, it absorbs some of the local culture including in its art. It's just a normal thing and has nothing to do with humans "creating" deities or whatever. The same thing happened with Buddhism. Siddhartha was Southeast Asian but is depicted as Chinese in China and so on. Both Jesus and Siddhartha were real people.So, you are saying to all the religious scholars, that their middle eastern image of Jesus is wrong? So man was not created in the image of God. God was created in the image of man. Sounds about right to me.
Excellent, you're finally starting to catch on.
Next, I would recommend reading www.klps.pl/pliki/gospel_fsm_eng.pdf to guide you on your spiritual journey.
R'Amen!
Both, actually.Were you just making a joke? Or, is this the recommended reading for your particular faith?
Both, actually.
No, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that as a religion grows and reaches different areas, it absorbs some of the local culture including in its art. It's just a normal thing and has nothing to do with humans "creating" deities or whatever. The same thing happened with Buddhism. Siddhartha was Southeast Asian but is depicted as Chinese in China and so on. Both Jesus and Siddhartha were real people.
I'm not sure exactly what you're talking about. You are apparently not understanding what I'm saying or something. Either way, I'm confused.Firstly, we are not talking about how man creates and assimilates deities to be a part of his culture. Secondly, there is a vast difference in changing the depiction of already established deities, and simply noting the similarities between deities from similar cultures. Finally, I have doubts, based on the conflicting evidence(i.e.., Jesus ben Pandira, or Jesus ben Strada) that neither JC or Buddha were historical figures, but will stipulate that they are perceived as such. I certainly don't belief that even if they WERE historical figures, that they WERE ever demigods, or were somehow be related directly to a God.
My point was why should the depiction of JC be culture specific, when the evidence gives a different image of the people of that time and place? If we simply creates Gods and demigods to fit our cultural image and expectations, do we also create the facts to support those beliefs as well? So again I ask, what do you think would happen to church attendance, if the image of JC was depicted in America, as Chinese, Black, Native American, South American, Japanese, or Indian? This also begs the question, as to which depictions of JC is correct, and which is false? Or, are all the depictions correct or false? Again, man creates his own gods in his own image, not in the true image of Gods or demigods. Makes perfect sense to me.
The Real Face Of Jesus - What Did Jesus Look Like?
https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/314759461428579418/
What did Jesus really look like?
So to be more accurate, many Black prisoners turn to their version of Islam for personal reasons. Also, many other minorities have turned to Islam as their religion, for their own personal reasons. This I can agree with. Beyond this, I need evidence.