I'm sure they love them just the same.Yes. That's a good point.
What about those parents of children who become drug addicts?
It's a 50/50 risk.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm sure they love them just the same.Yes. That's a good point.
What about those parents of children who become drug addicts?
It's a 50/50 risk.
You just need to study Darwin to understand Capitalism.Lol. Aren’t you a ball of fun? Lol
Read this for starters: Anyone Who Doesn’t Know The Following Facts About Capitalism Should Learn Them
I am not an anti-Natalist because unlike them, I think that people who have the parental vocation, should have children.I'm sure they love them just the same.
I think there's an idea that "it can't happen to me".I am not an anti-Natalist because unlike them, I think that people who have the parental vocation, should have children.
But the 90% of parents do not and yet make children.
What can't happen to us?I think there's an idea that "it can't happen to me".
When you become a parent...What can't happen to us?
Drug addicts are frequent in the richest milieus because you know, you need money to buy drugs.When you become a parent...
"My kid won't become a drug addict, because I'll do [this, that, the other thing].
Its hard to accept.
It can happen to anyone.Drug addicts are frequent in the richest milieus because you know, you need money to buy drugs.
And it deals with people who received the most expensive education.
So it happens to them.
...despite the education and the upbringing.It can happen to anyone.
There are rich drug addicts, and poor ones. And in between....despite the education and the upbringing.
Let's not exaggerate.Same with Christian Nationalists and Christian Reconstructionalists.
I give you an example.I don't have any children myself. My older brother has two children, both grown (my niece and nephew), and my niece has two children of her own. I do recall back when my brother first got married. Within a year, he was telling me that he and his wife were trying to have a child - and they obviously succeeded in that endeavor. I didn't bother to ask why; it just seemed like the natural thing for couples to want to do.
They did only have two children, which falls in line with the parameters of zero population growth while still in line with the replacement rate.
The right to procreate is a cherished human right, so I can't see treading on that. However, being that it's a major life-changing decision, it might be better if people approached it a bit more seriously rather than treating it as something that "just happens." It's not like the stork just shows up with another surprise.
Smart aleck!Because adults are too difficult to give birth to.
You know...in my language we have two terms.Smart aleck!
Where?But if the son of a typical man; or even a poor man, wants to get rich, there is a pretty good chance he will be able to accomplish it. After all, most rich people start off that way.
Smart aleck is a forum friendly way of saying "smart >donkey<" in our language. And your language isn't as mixed up with others quite as much as ours.You know...in my language we have two terms.
One means "people from 0 to 12 years"
The other term means "daughters and sons".
Hence the confusion in English.
But in my language we don't have that.
In French and in German there is the same interesting aspect.Smart aleck is a forum friendly way of saying "smart >donkey<" in our language. And your language isn't as mixed up with others quite as much as ours.
No exaggeration on my part. Speak for yourself.Let's not exaggerate
Under whatever context that may or may not be true, it is not relevant to what I saidCatholics advise to become either a nun or a priest.
It is relevant, considering that there are Catholics who are Christian Nationalists.No exaggeration on my part. Speak for yourself.
Under whatever context that may or may not be true, it is not relevant to what I said
That was simultaneously incoherent, bigoted and false. But mostly an incoherent mess.It is relevant, considering that there are Catholics who are Christian Nationalists.
You know...in the Vatican, they don't make children.
They are all gay...
Gays don't make babies.