I'd reply, but your "facts" and "arguments" remind me of grade school.
Well,ah . . . they do teach some of the basics in grade school you apparently missed.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'd reply, but your "facts" and "arguments" remind me of grade school.
You seem honest, but statements like this, both general and uninformed, belie either a naive, trusting nature or a stupidity you only rarely exhibit:
bb: 3) These flood stories are intertwined with their creation stories.
"No they are not."
When these stories were told in the firelight on cold winter nights, children believed they actually happened. 50 year old grandparents did not.Is it? How do you know that? It is presented as
being true.
The latter day revisionism in bible-interpretation
is a bit disingenuous, imo.
The earth as center of the universe had to be
abandoned, the bible re interpreted to fit.
The creation story was literal until 6 days,
everything poofed into place became too
obviously false, then days became of mu;lti-
million year length.
Where do you stop, with "just a teaching-story"?
There are lots of those, and even little red riding hood
is closer to possible than the flood.
It teaches a better lesson, too.
The nature of man? Nothing new or insightful
in the story.
The nature of god,?. The nature of something
that does not even exist, but if it did, it is "love". (?)
The flood story makes god out to be a bungling
psycho monster. Destroy the innocent for the
sins of the guilty, kill kill kill. And in a slow horrible
way, besides, (before tossing them in a lake of
fire)
What the hell kind of lesson is that?
When these stories were told in the firelight on cold winter nights, children believed they actually happened. 50 year old grandparents did not.
Actually no, though Creation stories do exist in many cultures, they are separate from the flood stories, and they are more a mix of polytheistic animalist and anthropomorphic Creation stories that do not resemble the Biblical Creation. The flood stories are overwhelmingly specific referring to river floods, and Tsunamis, The catastrophic geologic regional and local floods related to the melting of the glaciers, are for the most part not recorded by the ancient cultures.
You have no references to document what you have described above.
Trusting the actual geologic objective verifiable evidence does confirm the ancient records and stories as being catastrophic river floods and tsunamis. In Japan, Northwest Americas and around the Pacific rim are stories that specific tsunami events documented by the physical evidence. The catastrophic river flood of China is also extremely well documented by both Chinese written records, and geologic evidence.
Your argument is indeed general and uninformed of the specific scientific evidence, and based only on your religious agenda. You have not provided nor cited any specific scientific nor archaelogical evidence to support your assertions.
I see! You've investigated all 120 creation accounts of the ancient world. I stand corrected.
Audie, we teach the children at their own developmental level. They think concretely. That is normal for them. When they are more mature, if they don't figure it out for themselves, hopefully it will be explained to them. Sadly, sometimes it isn't. After all, there are different opinions on this, even within Judaism. The point is to absorb what it teaches about mankind (that it can be so wicked it deserves to be punished) and what it teaches about God (that he judges the wicked). That, btw, does not make God a monster. It makes him just.Great! Lie to the kids, tell them the place is run
by a murderous psycho monster.
Kids are vulnerable and credulous that way.
I am not-I can see right away that you just made
up that "grandparents did not".
All this does say something about human
nature, especially those commotted to a
great web of fantasy, tall tales, deception.
Audie, we teach the children at their own developmental level. They think concretely. That is normal for them. When they are more mature, if they don't figure it out for themselves, hopefully it will be explained to them. Sadly, sometimes it isn't. After all, there are different opinions on this, even within Judaism. The point is to absorb what it teaches about mankind (that it can be so wicked it deserves to be punished) and what it teaches about God (that he judges the wicked). That, btw, does not make God a monster. It makes him just.
Lord of The Rings features dwarves...but so does Dungeons and Dragons! Explain that.
The culture the authors of Gilgamesh came from were plains dwellers, i.e. not that familiar with boats.
In The Bible, Giants lived in the earth before the flood. God said he'd destroy everything in the earth, but repented, and only destroyed everything from the face of the earth.
Like the giants, Hori and the Horites lived in Mt. Seir. Esau married into their family.
When Nebuchadnezzar invaded and Esau moved north, so did the Horites.
Esau became known as Ashkenazi Jews. Hori is in the Poetic Edda, Voluspo, known as, Hor, is a dwarf, and he lived in the earth. Ai and Alvin are his relatives...
Alvan is Hori's kin in Genesis 35, and Ai is a city near Seir.
The Native Americans who survived the flood in the earth are called Hopi.
In The Bible, Giants lived in the earth before the flood. God said he'd destroy everything in the earth, but repented, and only destroyed everything from the face of the earth.
Like the giants, Hori and the Horites lived in Mt. Seir. Esau married into their family.
When Nebuchadnezzar invaded and Esau moved north, so did the Horites.
Esau became known as Ashkenazi Jews. Hori is in the Poetic Edda, Voluspo, known as, Hor, is a dwarf, and he lived in the earth. Ai and Alvin are his relatives...
Alvan is Hori's kin in Genesis 35, and Ai is a city near Seir.
The Native Americans who survived the flood in the earth are called Hopi.
In The Bible, Giants lived in the earth before the flood. God said he'd destroy everything in the earth, but repented, and only destroyed everything from the face of the earth.
Like the giants, Hori and the Horites lived in Mt. Seir. Esau married into their family.
When Nebuchadnezzar invaded and Esau moved north, so did the Horites.
Esau became known as Ashkenazi Jews. Hori is in the Poetic Edda, Voluspo, known as, Hor, is a dwarf, and he lived in the earth. Ai and Alvin are his relatives...
Alvan is Hori's kin in Genesis 35, and Ai is a city near Seir.
The Native Americans who survived the flood in the earth are called Hopi.
LOLOL. That's a doozy. Where does it come from?
First, no evidence of the Noah flood. Second, the above is a product of mythology and a creative imagination. Third, many tribes of the Americas have a long history based on archaeology going back older than any record of the flood. Worldwide there are continuous settlement of humans without records without a record or evidence they were destroyed by a flood.
Yes, there are records and documentation of local catastrophic floods throughout human history up until today, but there were always survivors to write about the floods.
IF the bible really really says there was such a flood,
giants or no giants, it is just another book of moldy bs.
Plato thought it's more logical to believe mythologies that offer no proofs, and search for truth in them, than to doubt them...
"Enough on this head; and now let what we have said about the nature of the created and visible gods have an end.
To know or tell the origin of the other divinities is beyond us, and we must accept the traditions of the men of old time who affirm themselves to be the offspring of the gods-that is what they say-and they must surely have known their own ancestors.
How can we doubt the word of the children of the gods?
Although they give no probable or certain proofs, still, as they declare that they are speaking of what took place in their own family, we must conform to custom and believe them."
Timaeus
Now that's a moldy old opinon.
Can you please come up with something original next time?