• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why Does An Archangel From Heaven Have to Debate For Years They Exist?

Do you think Zanda is an archangel?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 8.8%
  • No

    Votes: 30 88.2%
  • Not sure? Ask...

    Votes: 1 2.9%

  • Total voters
    34

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
Hey, what happens to whoever doesn't make the cut? We all die?
We're all quantum code, some will be absorbed into reality, some resurrected into new bodies.

It is like the Matrix is being formatted to a root level to remove viruses; it will be cleansed, the game then comes back with fewer, and better quality players.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
Still not Inspired :) I have had a couple of years to gauge your posts.
Do you get how argumentative, and rude that just was? :(

You state if I had a book, I post a book, you say you won't bother reading it as you know it is crap; seriously???

Wow disgusting. :oops:

The poetry has been written over my life with 70 poems, and 14000 words; yet you know it is all crap - that is literally the most trollish thing I've ever seen someone do online.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
So, basically, you claim that you're the prophesied Jewish Messiah?
According to the Biblical text this is provable.
The one who the Jews are waiting for?
The Rabbinic Jews are waiting for a fairytale outside of the texts; yet what is within the text I can show where I fulfil it.
Rather than just some other saviour-type figure?
I also fulfil prophecy in Hindu & Buddhist texts, which cross reference with Revelation.

Zoroastrian texts are specific with my name within them; haven't read the Taoist eschatological texts, yet know of prophecies within them, etc.
So, just to be clear, you're saying that Christ is neither human nor divine but is instead a specially created being? A creature who is non-consubstantial with God and not human either?
The Source is like a CPU that manifest reality at a quantum level.

The beings it creates are Code/Word within the Matrix.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
I stand by my previous statements. Keep participating. Try to avoid making messianic claims. I think it's a distraction from the other cool stuff you post.
Lets deal with maths, as for 15 years I've tried it, and it doesn't work:

$Ideas-Outside-of-Normal-Parameters X $No-Authority = 0 on all answers.

$Ideas-Outside-of-Normal-Parameters X $Authority-of-Legitimate-Messiah = Will make a sum more like 50% for many...

Which is enough to be heard by many, and for us to create world Peace between the religions.

Like imagine we've never met the person before, and someone introduced us to someone profound - which person's understanding are we likely to respect the most?

A) The proven Messiah.

B) Someone who has some ideas, that no one agrees with.

Everyone keeps treating me like B, and it is dumb, as we can show A between us.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

Eddi

Christianity
Premium Member
According to the Biblical text this is provable.

The Rabbinic Jews are waiting for a fairytale outside of the texts; yet what is within the text I can show where I fulfil it.

I also fulfil prophecy in Hindu & Buddhist texts, which cross reference with Revelation.

Zoroastrian texts are specific with my name within them; haven't read the Taoist eschatological texts, yet know of prophecies within them, etc.

The Source is like a CPU that manifest reality at a quantum level.

The beings it creates are Code/Word within the Matrix.

In my opinion. :innocent:
You’re obviously intelligent, and there is obviously a lot going on in your brain, and you're an interesting person

But what you claim is absurd therefore there must be something wrong with the reasoning that got you to what you’re currently claiming, no matter how clever it all seems

I suppose what you’re arguing is valid in that on one level in that it makes sense internally, but not sound as it also happens to be untrue

I think you're a good example of someone with a malfunctioning intellect

Also, could you please define “Quantum”, “CPU” and “The Source”?
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
You’re obviously intelligent, and there is obviously a lot going on in your brain, and you're an interesting person

But what you claim is absurd
There is a reason for everything, we should always ask if unsure, especially if we find someone smarter than us; as what is one man's technology, is another's magic.
Also, could you please define “Quantum”, “CPU” and “The Source”?
In the quantum physics dimensions which I saw in my NDE, the Source of our realities mathematical structuring is beyond quantum physics in the 13th dimension.

Reality is made from lots of little strands (quantums), that have no form unless coordinated into something constructive; so the Source calculates all the particles like a CPU in a massive mathematical matrix quantum computer (Reality).

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

Eddi

Christianity
Premium Member
Well, thanks for sharing but I don't really understand any of that...

So, either:

1) I'm too stupid
2) You're super-intelligent and not like other men etc.
3) What you're saying doesn't make sense and cannot be understood as it's non-understandable gibberish and the product of a malfunctioning intellect

I like to think of myself as being reasonably intelligent so I'm going to say that it's either option 2 or 3
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
Well, seeing as we've been doing it for about 2000 years, I don't see how it's impossible.
Our people have been under the Curse of Moses (Deuteronomy 28) for two thousand years, this isn't a long term successful plan... Next is the Holy Quantum fire of Deuteronomy 29:19-27.

Yehudah implies 'those who praise the Lord'; Yehoshua was specifically named (Lord Saves) to test Jews.
I highly disagree.
There will be somewhere that the teachings, are muddled by the Christian lies that came after, and corrupted the message of Yeshua (Salvation - H3444).
I hope you know that "Hashem" is just a title for God's name
Yes I'm aware since the Exile, that the Jews forgot how to pronounce Yahavah, so don't say it as they think they are cursing; which I'd agree, the bad pronunciations by many gets me in trouble as well.

Whereas saying it with power actually creates magic from the Word, if done properly - Yah ▲▼ avah.

There is One God Most High (El Elyon) the Source of reality.

There are 24 Divine Beings (Elohim), which are the Divine Council... Yahavah Elohim, Yeshua Elohim, David Elohim, Zion Elohim, etc.

Hashem is a reference to Yahavah Elohim being the Head of the Council, and no acknowledgment the God Most High existing without Yahavah (Lord of Creation)...

Creation doesn't need to exist for the Source of reality to exist, therefore it never had a name, as it is beyond names, and sound; therefore do you get people are making an idol by using Hashem in the way they do, and why the Curse is on them (Deuteronomy 32:17-18)?

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
2) You're super-intelligent and not like other men etc.
The thread is I'm an archangel, which means I'm not necessarily always communicating at the same level; yet I will always try to help people wherever possible.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

Eddi

Christianity
Premium Member
The thread is I'm an archangel, which means I'm not necessarily always communicating at the same level;
Well, I don't think you're an Arch Angel...

You remind me of how I once was, for a while...

I too had impenetrable ideas which no one else could understand but which made perfect sense to me! ;)

Are you unhappy about the prospect of being human?

You're the only human I've ever encountered who doesn't identify as human

yet I will always try to help people where ever possible.
That's good to hear
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
Are you unhappy about the prospect of being human?
The religious texts are real, having spent my life studying, and having data to show where ideas exist is why I accept things.

In terms of being human it is fun, if we didn't have Armageddon, and the Great Tribulation looming over us, and there was some way to make a positive outcome.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
So this is what it's like watching someone try to form a cult. It's truly fascinating.
Cults generally create subgroups, and branch off; the plan is to take the whole system or why bother trying.

This plan is in all the world's religious texts as One by the Source of reality, before the End of Time.

This debate is to see if we can rectify the situation, between humanities comprehension of the Divine; plus quantifying if anyone has read many of the world's religious texts, to then know that this is real.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

Howard Is

Lucky Mud
Also, could you please define “Quantum”, “CPU” and “The Source”?

That’s the crux of the biscuit.

They are null pointers. In programming, that means a pointer which does not point to a valid object or function.

This is where the grand architecture @wizanda has created comes unstuck. There is no valid interpretation of those words.

For anyone to agree with these ideas, they would have to be certain that those words referred to something they understand.

Even if they were certain, it would not mean that they had the same view as wizanda, because they would be agreeing about entirely undefined terms.
 

Eddi

Christianity
Premium Member
That’s the crux of the biscuit.

They are null pointers. In programming, that means a pointer which does not point to a valid object or function.

This is where the grand architecture @wizanda has created comes unstuck. There is no valid interpretation of those words.

For anyone to agree with these ideas, they would have to be certain that those words referred to something they understand.

Even if they were certain, it would not mean that they had the same view as wizanda, because they would be agreeing about entirely undefined terms.
Fascinating perspective, thanks for sharing
 
Top