Don Penguinoini
Modi.
Uh, no. It's Jai Swaminarayan.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's probably because homosexual threads are against the will of god. God made male threads for female threads, and nothing else is permissible.it's amazing how fast homosexual threads spiral uncontrollably into oblivion.
Then in future, I suggest that you say so, like this, "In my opinion...", "I believe that..." and the like.
No factual allegations?Ok fine, but... I learned in an English class in high school that when you write an opinion paper, it's not necessary to say "in my opinion". It goes without saying. This entire RF is everyone's opinion.
Good. More debate is needed to weed out ignornt views.i could make a thread right now withthe title "Homo" and the body "sexual" and the thread would reach 10,000 Views and 1,000 Posts in 2 days flat.
madhatter said:it's amazing how fast homosexual threads spiral uncontrollably into oblivion.
It's wierd how touchy some people get when you tell them the Creator of the universe disapproves of their monogamous relationship with the person they've fallen in love with, especially when this view is used to justify barring them from marrying their true love.madhatter said:i could make a thread right now withthe title "Homo" and the body "sexual" and the thread would reach 10,000 Views and 1,000 Posts in 2 days flat.
I don't see how a person saying that they would tolerate a behavior (by rejoicing that the other person has the freedom to do it) that they personally do not condone can be misrepresented as (a) harm or (b) "condoning" intolerance.