Satans_Serrated_Edge
Deicidal
My what a lot of opinions you have. So you know how things 'ought' to be do you? You and a few billion other believers. Maybe after a few more wars are fought over such ideals everyone will agree. Doubtful though, because things 'are' how they have been since homo-sapiens evolved into the animal we are today, and that's how it 'ís'.I never said life is free of harm or pain or suffering, but "might makes right" is a pitiful philosophy. We cannot exist without some type of morality, and it is increasingly important on a global scale. Life on this planet will not exist much longer without morality, and that includes environmental ethics. We are all interconnected.
Furthermore, "is" does not indicate "ought." So the universe is indifferent. That doesn't mean we should be. It is our indifference that has led to environmental perils and the threat to all of our lives.
Selfishisness is a part of life and proper within balance and context, but pure selfishness doesn't work. We are interconnected whether or not we like it. We can't serve our own interests, usually, outside of society, and that requires morals. And we cannot sustain our existence within the interconnected web of life without morals.
As I feel the universe is infinitely more qualified to tell me how it should be than you are, I would say what 'ís' and what ought to be are one and the same.
I was going to reply to your bit on selfishness but I just don't see how it's relevant to anything.