You might be antitheistic as well, by which I mean one who considers particular forms of religion to be a net harm to the community. If you would prefer to see the forces behind the Christian church's political agenda in America diminished to level of the Jews and Muslims, then you might be an antitheist. Each of those groups might impose a ban on pork on all Americans if they had the power to do so, but they don't. We can't say that about the Christian church, which has invaded the president's cabinet, and is positioned to stack the Supreme Court, The antitheist want to see that political presence weakened to the same degree as the other religions in America.
This is the attitude that is called angry or militant atheism, but as you can see, it is previously disempowered people that have finally gotten a voice objecting to many aspects of the modern Christian church including, as Shunyadragon documented, the marginalizing and demonizing of atheists by depicting them as immoral people outside of the norm of acceptability in America, but more importantly, antitheists are people that feel a need to defend a cherished American principle, church-state separation, from a political force that has no respect for it. It wasn't that long ago that atheists were deemed unfit to teach, coach, adopt, or serve on juries, and voters apparently still consider us unfit for elected office. There are no openly atheistic member of either house of Congress to my knowledge.
I hope that you will agree that this is a very reasonable position, that it is sincerely held and being constructively offered - not angry - and is in opposition to what are considered bad or unjust ideas - not people. Antitheists are also accused of hating Christians (and God).