• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why don't Christians give burnt offerings?

Pegg

Jehovah our God is One
Jesus is the burnt offering we christians give.
He died on the cross for our sins, and since then, He had become the only burnt offering we christians need to give to God.

we dont give Jesus as a burnt offering... God does.

We benefit from the value of that sacrifice for God affords forgiveness of sins by means of it.

But we are told to offer sacrifices to God...
Hebrews 13:15*Through him let us always offer to God a sacrifice of praise, that is, the fruit of lips which make public declaration to his name. 16*Moreover, do not forget the doing of good and the sharing of things with others, for with such sacrifices God is well pleased

These are the sacrifices that Christians are to offer God.
 

Pegg

Jehovah our God is One
What is the process for giving a burnt offering? How should the animal be slaughtered before being cremated, or is it not specified?

Thanks

it is specified in the Hebrew scriptures as part of the mosaic law given to Isreal. But Christians are not required to offer such sacrifices because Jesus sacrifice ended the need for animal sacrifices.

Hebrews 9:11*However, when Christ came as a high priest of the good things that have come to pass, through the greater and more perfect tent not made with hands, that is, not of this creation, 12*he entered, no, not with the blood of goats and of young bulls, but with his own blood, once for all time into the holy place and obtained an everlasting deliverance [for us].
 

Shermana

Heretic
Wrong. As I understand it, that chapter is a prophecy of the Church. The sacrifice mentioned is metaphorical for the Eucharist.

I highly doubt Zechariah and all his readers would have been given something purely metaphorical beyond their understanding of the concepts given. One can read anything they want into something, that does not make the plain reading wrong. I fail to see how the Eucharist is a "Sacrifice" in the first place.

21 Every pot in Jerusalem and Judah will be holy to the Lord Almighty, and all who come to sacrifice will take some of the pots and cook in them. And on that day there will no longer be a Canaanite[c] in the house of the Lord Almighty

So I guess it also says that everyone will cook their own Eucharist in their own pots and pans as well? What does it mean tha there will no longer be a Canaanite in the Temple? Well I guess that kind of does go with Jesus calling the Canaanite woman a dog now doesn't it. Let me guess, "Canaanite" is a metaphor for non-Christians?

What is the metaphor for the gentiles having to go up to obey Succoth or being wrought with plagues and drought?
 
Last edited:

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
I highly doubt Zechariah and all his readers would have been given something purely metaphorical beyond their understanding of the concepts given. One can read anything they want into something, that does not make the plain reading wrong. I fail to see how the Eucharist is a "Sacrifice" in the first place.

What is the metaphor for the gentiles having to go up to obey Succoth or being wrought with plagues and drought?

You're a Messianic Jew, right? So why are you in the Christian DIR trying to argue with people?
 

Shermana

Heretic
You're a Messianic Jew, right? So why are you in the Christian DIR trying to argue with people?

Because the Christian DIR is a Green DIR, and I'm not arguing. I'm discussing and asking questions. If anything, when you said "Wrong", you were arguing.

Also, Messianic Jews are "Christians". They were the original people to be called "Christians", says Acts.
 
Last edited:

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Because the Christian DIR is a Green DIR, and I'm not arguing. I'm discussing. If anything, when you said "Wrong", you were arguing.

Also, Messianic Jews are "Christians". They were the original people to be called "Christians", says Acts.

No, you are arguing. You want to have a back and forth over this, when you know we're not going to agree.

Then maybe you should alert a mod that the Messianic Judaism DIR should be included in the Christian subforum. :rolleyes:
 

Shermana

Heretic
No, you are arguing. You want to have a back and forth over this, when you know we're not going to agree.

Then maybe you should alert a mod that the Messianic Judaism DIR should be included in the Christian subforum. :rolleyes:

When I said "Zechariah 14 says otherwise", that's a discussion. You said I was wrong, and then started the back and forth giving your point of view. You argued with me. I followed up with respectful questions. I merely made a statement.

I have said that it should be part of the subforum before but they believe it's best to give it its own.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
When I said "Zechariah 14 says otherwise", that's a discussion. You said I was wrong, and then started the back and forth giving your point of view. You argued with me. I merely made a statement.

:rolleyes: I'm not going to get into an argument about that here.
 
Top