mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Please rephrase.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why Evolution Is Wrong In Biology And What is Right?
- Thread starter MrIntelligentDesign
- Start date
Please rephrase.
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
Please, define intelligence and solve this problem: is biological cell intelligently designed or not? If not, then, you are not doing any real science.
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
I mean, can science explain the origin of universe or life or existence or logic or reason naturally?
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
With certain assumptions, yes. You just use other assumptions.
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
So, just admit that you have no clue. It is much easier.Well, I don't believe like you in real as you do. So I stop here.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Yes, I am a general strong skeptic and I know nothing and I even do know that. Tell me something new other than you believe differently than me.
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
That is the reason why before you conclude naturalism, you need to know first the definition or boundary line between natural and non natural, or in my case, intelligence to non-intelligence, especially, in the topic of origin in science. Thus, your skepticism has no basis or foundation if you cannot solve the two opposite extremes...
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
Anybody can assume, even an ignorant fool can assume, but in science, you must always support that assumptions.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Well, I am neither a naturalist or a non-naturalist or an intelligence to non-intelligence kind of guy. So I have solved that as a skeptic. For such foundational beliefs I just state that I don't know nor believe in them.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
That is not possible in my belief system.
gnostic
The Lost One
Except you haven't falsify anything, let alone Evolution.
If you were able to do so, you would have shown your evidence and data by now, but all you do is give us a runaround...dodge here, make excuses there, then repeat. You have avoided presenting any evidence & data and cited any peer-reviewed source to support your position.
You haven't tested Evolution, nor have you refute it with your tests. All you do is - MAKE CLAIMS that you have "falsify Evolution".
Claims without evidence, it means that you have nothing to offer.
Plus, if you wanted to replace Evolution with Intelligent Design, as alternative, then you need to falsify Intelligent Design, not Evolution.
Even if you or someone manage to refute Evolution, it doesn't mean Intelligent Design is a new scientific theory, by default. Sciences don't work that way, but it would seem no Intelligent Design creationists understand the concept of Falsifibility and Scientific Method.
You have to show Intelligent Design to be true, by testing Intelligent Design, not testing Evolution, which you have done. And testing means showing the evidence and data. You have none to give.
Actually no ID creationists have shown evidence and data that backed Intelligent Design. All they do is use misinformation and propaganda and write useless and baseless books and webpages.
gnostic
The Lost One
Which YOU haven't done.
We keep getting you bragging about "I have falsified Evolution" or something similar, but when ask what evidence or data you have to refute Evolution, you avoid these questions for more information.
You are being dodgy, evasive, when other members ask for more details, not only what you have against Evolution, but also what you have for Intelligent Design.
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
How will you falsify Evolution without digging fossils?
I'm more curious about how one falsifies a theory by doing absolutely nothing except claiming they did it.
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
OK, I will change the question: how will you uproot a wrong tree in a park? If you cannot answer this, oh my, I will question your education and intellectual ability.
I'm gonna answer 2.
Now: If you can't answer the following, I will question your ability in general:
What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?
I wouldn't uproot the wrong tree. Why would I do that? Why would I be uprooting trees in parks at all?
You already question the education and intellectually ability of everyone that points out that you have not done what you claim. That is no surprise or threat. It is meaningless coming from someone that cannot explain themselves or recognize that they have not done anything they claim to have done.
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
Lol!! Why are you afraid to answer a simple question? lol!
MrIntelligentDesign
Active Member
Huh?? What are you doing here?