There is no trinity in the scriptures....period. The Jews never knew their God as part of a trinity. (Deuteronomy 6:4)
Jesus never once claimed any equality with his superior Father who was also his God. Even when he returned to heaven, the Father was still his God. (Revelation 3:12)
In reference to the "I AM" it is interesting that God has never used that designation to describe himself.
From the Tanakh Exodus 3:13-15 reads...
"And Moses said to God, "Behold I come to the children of Israel, and I say to them, 'The God of your fathers has sent me to you,' and they say to me, 'What is His name?' what shall I say to them?" יגוַיֹּ֨אמֶר משֶׁ֜ה אֶל־הָֽאֱלֹהִ֗ים הִנֵּ֨ה אָֽנֹכִ֣י בָא֘ אֶל־בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵל֒ וְאָֽמַרְתִּ֣י לָהֶ֔ם אֱלֹהֵ֥י אֲבֽוֹתֵיכֶ֖ם שְׁלָחַ֣נִי אֲלֵיכֶ֑ם וְאָֽמְרוּ־לִ֣י מַה־שְּׁמ֔וֹ מָ֥ה אֹמַ֖ר אֲלֵהֶֽם:
14God said to Moses, "Ehyeh asher ehyeh (I will be what I will be)," and He said, "So shall you say to the children of Israel, 'Ehyeh (I will be) has sent me to you.'" ידוַיֹּ֤אמֶר אֱלֹהִים֙ אֶל־משֶׁ֔ה אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה אֲשֶׁ֣ר אֶֽהְיֶ֑ה וַיֹּ֗אמֶר כֹּ֤ה תֹאמַר֙ לִבְנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה שְׁלָחַ֥נִי אֲלֵיכֶֽם:
15And God said further to Moses, "So shall you say to the children of Israel, 'The Lord God of your forefathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.' This is My name forever, and this is how I should be mentioned in every generation. טווַיֹּ֩אמֶר֩ ע֨וֹד אֱלֹהִ֜ים אֶל־משֶׁ֗ה כֹּ֣ה תֹאמַר֘ אֶל־בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵל֒ יְהֹוָ֞ה אֱלֹהֵ֣י אֲבֹֽתֵיכֶ֗ם אֱלֹהֵ֨י אַבְרָהָ֜ם אֱלֹהֵ֥י יִצְחָ֛ק וֵֽאלֹהֵ֥י יַֽעֲקֹ֖ב שְׁלָחַ֣נִי אֲלֵיכֶ֑ם זֶה־שְּׁמִ֣י לְעֹלָ֔ם וְזֶ֥ה זִכְרִ֖י לְדֹ֥ר דֹּֽר"
You can see that God's name
יְהֹוָ֞ה means...not "
I AM"....but "
I Will Be". It bears no correlation to John 8:58 at all. God has only one name (Psalm 83:18 KJV, ASV) ...but Jesus has several names, depending upon which role he is playing.
Jesus never taught a triune concept. He is the “son” of a Father, which makes him younger than the one who is responsible for his existence. He is "only begotten" because he is the first and only direct creation of his Father....the rest of creation came "through" the son, but not "from" him. (Colossians 1:15-17)
If their relationship was not understandable by us humans here on earth, then why would God describe their relationship in human terms? If they were equal in any way, then their relationship would have been described accordingly. Jesus was the "son of God" long before he became the human 'son of Mary'.
As for Jesus being Michael the Archangel, there is reason to believe that this is the case. There are only two angels mentioned by name in the Bible in both the Hebrew and Greek scriptures..."Michael" and "Gabriel".
Only two individuals are described as having angelic armies under their command...Jesus and Michael. They are very likely the same personage in different roles.
Micheal is called
“the great prince who is standing in behalf of God’s people” (Daniel 12:1) is also described as being a key figure in the eviction of Satan from heaven. But taking the Revelation as a prophesy, it is apparent that this eviction was to take place in
“the Lord’s day”....a time future to the time of John's writing. Placing that eviction in a timeline, “the Lord’s day” is the time period that sees the rule of God’s Kingdom taking control of the earth. (Daniel 2:44) We are living in the days of the last kings of Daniel's prophesy.
Satan's anger continues to escalate as his days are running out. (Revelation 12:7-12) When have we ever seen the whole world in such unrelenting turmoil?
Reference to the "woman" in Revelation is not Mary....but rather it is applied to God's symbolic "wife"....his heavenly support system of spirit creatures. This is where Jesus came from. His life was transferred from heaven to the womb of a Jewish virgin in order for him to be born sinless and to offer his life in behalf of all who put faith in him as their redeemer.
If we correlate the events of Daniel’s prophesy with the events in Revelation, we can see that they describe the same period. Daniel was told to seal up his book because it was for "the time of the end" when it would be understood....but not before then. (Daniel 12:4, 9-10) I believe that we are deep into the time of the end right now.
Satan has been cast out of heaven and only then was Jesus to receive "authority" to rule as King. If he was God, he needed no authority to be given to him. (Matthew 28:18) His rulership begins with "woe for the earth" as satan intensifies his assault on God's existence and his character, and as he continues to target his worshippers. Only when Jesus finally throws satan and his hordes into the abyss, and rids the world of the godless "goats", will this assault cease. (Revelation 20:1-3) Only then can the rebuilding begin and peace be restored to mankind. (Revelation 21:2-4)
It is not understood because it makes no sense. Jehovah (Yahweh) is "the only true God" according to Jesus (John 17:3) and since Jesus did not include himself in that designation, but referred to himself as "sent" by his Father, their relationship is now, and always has been, that of a son to a Father.
Jesus is not a "creator" and has never referred to himself as such. He is the "master worker" alongside his Father in creation (Proverbs 8:30-31) He is the agency "through" which the creation came, but he did not produce the raw materials...he merely constructed them as the reference in Genesis 1:26 states...
"Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness".....Jesus and his Father are the "us" and "our" in that verse....together they constructed everything, both in heaven and on earth......and the power used to accomplish it all was God's holy spirit, which is not of itself an entity, but rather the powerful force used by God to accomplish his will.
That is my understanding....