Nanda
Polyanna
Actually, I have known a few lesbians that are obese, and many more that don't fit the modern defintion of "hot."
You learned nothing from the fat chick thread, did you? tsk, tsk.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Actually, I have known a few lesbians that are obese, and many more that don't fit the modern defintion of "hot."
You learned nothing from the fat chick thread, did you? tsk, tsk.
Don't remember that thread, possibly before my time, but I would not be surprised to learn that lesbians on average are heavier than heterosexual women. Someone, when asked what the world without men would be like replied, "No war, and a lot of fat, happy women."
If we're not counting closeted lesbians, I'd think the obscenely obese women from poorer areas where homosexuality is extremely discriminated against would "tip the scales", excuse the pun.Don't remember that thread, possibly before my time, but I would not be surprised to learn that lesbians on average are heavier than heterosexual women.
This is a tangent, but why do people think this? Female rulers have often been bloodier than their male counterparts - Queen Mary, Margaret Thatcher just off the top of my head. Fewer females agree with the Iraq War, but not by much.Someone, when asked what the world without men would be like replied, "No war..."
Well, I did post my post about the fat lesbians before you created the thread.You learned nothing from the fat chick thread, did you? tsk, tsk.
Well, I did post my post about the fat lesbians before you created the thread.
I was mearly elaborating on the fact I know some lesbians that do not fit the definition of "hot," and they do have a few extra pounds. But, they do make up for it in personality.
My apologies if this has already been posted, but in Leviticus 20:13 it says "I[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]f a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them." The Bible explicitly calls for the slaying of all homosexuals. [/FONT]
[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]However, don't take my reply as an indicator I'm against same sex marriage. I'm actually for it. I'm just attempting to answer the question. [/FONT]
I would suggest you read through the rest of the thread KPereira. This point has already been argued.
That being said I would point you to the two links below. The first shows both sides of the arguments concerning the passages of the bible associated with homosexuality. The second talks about whether or not the translation of the original hebrew you are quoting is accurate.
Link 1
Link 2
[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]"they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them." [/FONT]
[FONT="]Does anyone reading this thread not think that this above line is absolutely ridiculous? [/FONT]
For anyone in this world today to support a religion that tells this to it's people, is down right wrong and should be considered a threat to the American society. Wow. Intolerance and ignorance, that is downright bull,.
You haven't answered the question at all. You've stated that the Bible says it's a sin. You haven't addressed the question of why it states it's a sin. (Hint: "because God said so" isn't a real answer, either:foot.My apologies if this has already been posted, but in Leviticus 20:13 it says "I[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]f a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them." The Bible explicitly calls for the slaying of all homosexuals.
However, don't take my reply as an indicator I'm against same sex marriage. I'm actually for it. I'm just attempting to answer the question.
[/FONT]
Why does Leviticus make this statement? What was going through the writer's mind?
The little hissing queen...!Maybe he was gay and was writing on the rebound?
Homosexuality does not equal pedophilia. Pedophilia is a documentable medical disorder, appearing as an entry with a definition in the DSM. It's also a felony crime. Homosexuality is neither, and does not appear in the DSM. I wish people would stop making this analogy. it only clouds the issue for homosexuals and their social acceptance, as well as for the victims of pedophilia and the justice issues connected with this ciriminal act. You're not helping anyone here.Wow, it should not be such a shock that the clergy of the catholic church was gay. Pretty fantastic creremonies they did, and all the long raped the kids that were their alter boys..
I agree that the two should not be mixed up.Homosexuality does not equal pedophilia. Pedophilia is a documentable medical disorder, appearing as an entry with a definition in the DSM. It's also a felony crime. Homosexuality is neither, and does not appear in the DSM. I wish people would stop making this analogy. it only clouds the issue for homosexuals and their social acceptance, as well as for the victims of pedophilia and the justice issues connected with this ciriminal act. You're not helping anyone here.
Paedophiles' sexual attraction is based on age, not gender.I agree that the two should not be mixed up.
I also agree that they are two completely different things.
However, I can see where people mix them up and lump them together.
Especially when the Catholic Church officially declares that "homosexuals have infiltrated the Catholic priesthood" in response to the Pedophile Priest Posse situation.