Wtf does it matter if they cite micky mouse verses
The ira were a catholic terrorist group in part funded by american catholic donation (noraid)
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why is Islam so dangerous?
- Thread starter Raymann
- Start date
Wtf does it matter if they cite micky mouse verses
The ira were a catholic terrorist group in part funded by american catholic donation (noraid)
You know size doesnt matter, it is the book that defines a religion, not its size... Try again
Shad
Veteran Member
As it would establish something called motive. Heard of it?
Funded by Irish Americans you mean. I wonder what the common link is. Could it be being Irish.
Try again.
Shad
Veteran Member
Wrong as you are making a point about violence and the number of verses. If a book contains 100 verses with 10 violent verses compared to a book with 1000 verses with 10 violent verses the latter book is less violent.
Math is hard....
The motivation was catholic independence from protestant rule.
Believe me i have very food reason to study the ira
Shad
Veteran Member
Nope it was Irish independence from the English. Hence the name. Irish Republican Army
Doubt it. If you have a serious reason you wouldn't be making the mistakes you are making here. Heck you can not even figure out the motive was independence from England
I wonder does the lords resistance army and anti balaka go round citing the bible as motivation for their abuses.
Noraid collected at catholic churches visited by irish catholics, NOT protestant churches
English protestants .learn some real history, not the revisionist bull designed to massage american christian egos
I make no mistakes, the motive was independence from protestant control. I guess if you actually bothered learning the history, say back to henry VIII and Cromwells time you may actually educate yourself a little
Shad
Veteran Member
The former does as per interviews. You need to name an actual group for the latter.
Noraid is an Irish group...... It accepted money from anyone supporting full independence of Ireland from England.
Provide a link to said interviews.
Anti balaka is an alliance of christian terror groups. Make your choice, they are all under the same banner
Anyone supporting independence from the UK were catholic
Shad
Veteran Member
This is nothing but a bluff as you have no idea what my sources are. Try again.
Nope. English.
I am using those events as evidence of English conquests. Conquests which go back before the Reformation. Figures such as King John when he was a Prince and lord of all Ireland.....as a Catholic. By your argument the Irish wouldn't care yet they rebelled..... Instead you want to ignore centuries of invasion, warfare and rebellions in order to try to equivocate the IRA with Islamic terrorism.
Shad
Veteran Member
What ever happened to Joseph Kony? The infamous Ugandan warlord
The "anti" made me think it was a category not an actual group.
Seems like it has non-Christian members. Although I do not know enough about the group.
Nope. Try again.
Protestant Irish nationalists - Wikipedia
Bull based on sanitised revisionist mock history.
Wouldnt care? Have you actually studied any of the history of ireland?
Nope, i mentioned a few recognised christian terror groups to show islamic terrorism is not unique, it seems one of them upset you.
Anti balaka does have a small number of non christians in the same way the ira have recently recruited a small number of protestants
Interesting, the first bit thst really caught my attention in your wiki link was
Despite their relatively small numbers,
Shad
Veteran Member
Again I cited no source. Another bluff. Try again.
Yes. You clearly haven't.
You just admitted it exactly what I said.
Definition of EQUIVOCATE
Wrong as I pulled one group, the IRA, out of that others. If I had objections to the other groups I would have commented. Try again.
Shad
Veteran Member
That is nice. Too bad you are now ignoring your own comment.
"Anyone supporting independence from the UK were catholic"
I refuted your claim. Next!
shmogie
Well-Known Member
Some facts for you, as to why Islam is dangerous.
Nikolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into Muslim inbreeding for 1,400 years.
His study found that ( facts) ;
1) almost 50% of Muslims in the world are inbred.
2) In Pakistan it is 70%
3) 67% in Saudi Arabia
4) Immigrants to Britain from Pakistan, 50% married to 1st cousins
5) Sudan 60%
6) Iraq 54%
7) A British Pakistani family is 13 times more likely to have children with recessive genetic conditions.
8) Pakistani´s account for 3% of births in the UK, yet 33% of children with genetic birth defects are Pakistani.
9) Muslim inbreeding means 18 times the average risk for autosomal disorders
10) Inbreeding makes the Muslim risk for death by malformation ten times higher than average
11) Inbreeding makes the Muslim chances for stillbirth 100% higher than average
12) The study found that children from first cousin marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ
13) First cousin marriages result in children with 70 or lower IQ scores ( mentally challenged) at a rate 400% higher than average
14) The study author states that inbreeding has seriously damaged the Muslim gene pool
1st cousin marriages are devastating to Muslims first, because Mohammed approved them, but they are dangerous to Western countries as well.
Who pays in these countries for the results of muslim inbreeding ? The average taxpayer. Do Muslims absorb medical and welfare services proportionate to their percentage of the population ? Do they absorb these resources at the average rate of the rest of the population ?
The answer is no to both questions.
,
They contribute less than average per capita in taxes, yet take taxpayer funds at a much, much higher rate than the average citizen.
To put it bluntly, their inbreeding with Mohammeds blessing makes them form a parasitic relationship with western society.
Muslim immigration ensures that the costs of 1400 years of inbreeding are born by societies who since Moses have found first cousin marriages to be extremely distasteful.
The Muslims won´t change, their gene pool will become more and more flawed.
I for one don´t think I should have to subsidize the insanity of their religion.
Of course you cited no source, i would expect nothing else
Very doubtful because i have and you can put on your condescending incredulity act all you want.
The nope was to your condescending attitude, not an admittance
Like i said, one group upset you?
shmogie
Well-Known Member
What about the Scots ? Protestants. The majority want to withdraw from the union with Britain.
Nope, not ignoring it, there are always a few idiots, they just do not count in the scheme of things.
But hey, you want to nitpick a win, go ahead, feel proud of yourself