• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why is Islam so dangerous?

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Some facts for you, as to why Islam is dangerous.

Nikolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into Muslim inbreeding for 1,400 years.

His study found that ( facts) ;

1) almost 50% of Muslims in the world are inbred.

2) In Pakistan it is 70%

3) 67% in Saudi Arabia

4) Immigrants to Britain from Pakistan, 50% married to 1st cousins

5) Sudan 60%

6) Iraq 54%

7) A British Pakistani family is 13 times more likely to have children with recessive genetic conditions.

8) Pakistani´s account for 3% of births in the UK, yet 33% of children with genetic birth defects are Pakistani.

9) Muslim inbreeding means 18 times the average risk for autosomal disorders

10) Inbreeding makes the Muslim risk for death by malformation ten times higher than average

11) Inbreeding makes the Muslim chances for stillbirth 100% higher than average

12) The study found that children from first cousin marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ

13) First cousin marriages result in children with 70 or lower IQ scores ( mentally challenged) at a rate 400% higher than average

14) The study author states that inbreeding has seriously damaged the Muslim gene pool

1st cousin marriages are devastating to Muslims first, because Mohammed approved them, but they are dangerous to Western countries as well.

Who pays in these countries for the results of muslim inbreeding ? The average taxpayer. Do Muslims absorb medical and welfare services proportionate to their percentage of the population ? Do they absorb these resources at the average rate of the rest of the population ?

The answer is no to both questions.
,
They contribute less than average per capita in taxes, yet take taxpayer funds at a much, much higher rate than the average citizen.

To put it bluntly, their inbreeding with Mohammeds blessing makes them form a parasitic relationship with western society.

Muslim immigration ensures that the costs of 1400 years of inbreeding are born by societies who since Moses have found first cousin marriages to be extremely distasteful.

The Muslims won´t change, their gene pool will become more and more flawed.

I for one don´t think I should have to subsidize the insanity of their religion.

Yet in the last century there have been an estimated 50 times more violent death caused by christians than muslims.

Which religion is the most violent?

See also

https://www.vox.com/world/2017/10/2/16396612/las-vegas-mass-shooting-terrorism-islam
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Of course you cited no source, i would expect nothing else

You never bothered to ask. Not my problem. Again you tried to bluff and failed.

Very doubtful because i have and you can put on your condescending incredulity act all you want.

Do not be jelly.

The nope was to your condescending attitude, not an admittance

Nope. More along the lines of laughter at easy to refute points.

Like i said, one group upset you?

No. I pointed out one of your list isn't based on religion. Look up the word "wrong" and try again.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
No our discussion between you and I was about Ireland not Scotland nor Wales. Namely the IRA as that is what I quoted. You went off into other topics as deflection

You made the discussion about ireland, and talk about going off onto other topics. Doing a jig over semantics??? Sheesh
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Read your source, it says nothing about Christians. Are you telling porkies ?

From my source...

The analysis presents some challenges. Should the answer be based purely on a body count? Professor Juan Cole casually estimates that Christians chalked up roughly 50 times more violent deaths than Muslims across the past century. That, however, doesn’t necessarily prove that Christianity is more violent. It just demonstrates a high level of efficiency. To answer the question we need more than a raw death toll.

Apology accepted
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
In the past sure. Present? Nope.



Yes ergo the context was Ireland in our discussion. You brought up other points unrelated to Ireland and the IRA like the LRA not I. Read the comment chain again.


I brought up the lra long before you even stepped in.

Physician heal thyself
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
You made a blunder and now you are deflecting as you were refuted. Look in the mirror and get a dictionary. You were wrong and can not admit it. Simple as that.

So i misused a used a word on the internet... Burn me
 
Top