-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why is pornography bad?
- Thread starter Skwim
- Start date
Pegg
Jehovah our God is One
:clap bravo you figured us out lol
Yona
Frum Mastah Flex
Yeah, stupid Jooozz, pssssh.
darkendless
Guardian of Asgaard
Careful pet. People don't like their religion being called stupid.
ninerbuff
godless wonder
Isn't sex like "dirty" to people of faith?
If "adam and eve" didn't "sin" and eat that fruit, don't you think we'd all be walking around nude and having sex in public?
darkendless
Guardian of Asgaard
Whilst i'm not arguing what you're saying, pointing it out may result in you being banned. Seen it before will see it again.
Pegg
Jehovah our God is One
sex is only dirty to those who treat it like dirt
ninerbuff
godless wonder
So if we treat pornography "cleanly" then it's not dirty?
Pegg
Jehovah our God is One
ninerbuff
godless wonder
Subjective. Many use pornography to learn how to make things like fellatio/cunniligus more enjoyable to their partner, or even to different positions they may not have tried before. People learn sex from a source and I'm more than sure it's not from their parents!
Pegg
Jehovah our God is One
darkendless
Guardian of Asgaard
Books are engineering lol
ninerbuff
godless wonder
So you're saying that when you first had sex, you and your partner knew exactly what to do?perhaps people who need porn to learn about sex dont have a great imagination
I know my first time wasn't the most pleasurable, nor the most memorable.
Midnight Pete
Well-Known Member
ninerbuff
godless wonder
Or I just have high testosterone. You do know that testosterone is directly related to libido.
Midnight Pete
Well-Known Member
I am neither clever nor superior.
indian tea
Purveyor of Rare Herbs
pornography implicitly implies lust and certain reactions or it would not be porn, it would be art
does this make porn "bad" per se? no
It does make the original post inherantly flawed though
does this make porn "bad" per se? no
It does make the original post inherantly flawed though
Skwim
Veteran Member
What makes the original post inherently flawed? And why?
Last edited:
ninerbuff
godless wonder
The Gold Rush Cheerleaders keep all their clothes on, but I still lust them and get aroused. Again I think that it's subjective.
indian tea
Purveyor of Rare Herbs
sure....
but porn is specifically designed to promote lust and certain sexual reactions
because again otherwise it would be art....
the line between art and porn is very thin... art is designed specifically to cause reactions, contraversy, it is an expression of consciousness.... in its sexual extremes we have graphic images of a sexual nature and actual people having or performing sexual acts as a part of art.... for example one artist I know of actually employed blind folds and cardboard cut outs with holes...for anonymous intercourse performance art pieces during the 80's.... or "glory holes" ...now this is pushing thwe envelope..and watching it bend...and extreme....
but it is designed to ellicit far more responses than merely sexual lust or similar expressions that porn does... porn is geared toward certain responses...again or it wouldn't be porn...it would be art. Porn is porn....
whether you find it good or bad is wholly subjective...
the original post asks why it should be demonized, there is our answer...
because it IS porn, because it implies and promotes certain reactions...
PORN is PORN
whehter it is RIGHT or WRONG to demonize porn is a wholly other topic....
the reason to demonize porn is because it is porn.........not art
the lines are of course blurry, one can cite what I did above or many films....
but I would venture to say a person would have a tough time defending a film from a website about "Milfs" as a piece of art.......