It's not as simple as that.Among the Jews, the family tree is very important, which can be seen just from the fact that the OT contains many family trees. For Jews family trees are identification, they show who a person is, to whom he belongs. Family trees are also proof for heirs, because in order to inherit something from an ancestor, the descendant must prove that he is the rightful heir and this is proven by a family tree. And that is the point, for we know that the Messiah is the rightful heir of King David and thus ascends the throne of David. Now the fact is that all the genealogical records of the Jews were destroyed by the Romans during the destruction of the temple. Only one family tree survived, the family tree of Jesus in the NT which goes from David to him. With this family tree one can prove that Jesus is a descendant of David and therefore has the right to the kingship of David. He is the only one who can do this, all other Jews living today have no family tree that leads up to David. If a Jew shows up and claims to be the Messiah but is not Jesus, he cannot prove that he is the descendant of David because he has no family tree.
Ask yourself, why did God destroy all the genealogies of the Jews except that of Jesus. He did it so that the world would know that there can be no other Messiah except Jesus.
Paul says his Jesus was descended from David (Romans 1: 3), but gives no other detail, not even the names of his earthly parents.
Mark says his Jesus was not descended from David (Mark 12:35-37).
The Jesuses of Matthew (Matthew 1:2-16 for Joesph) and of Luke (Luke 3:23+ for Joseph) are in the absurd position of being claimed to be descended from David, but that's supported by two fake and incompatible genealogies which anyway are expressly for Joseph, who out loud and proud is NOT Jesus' father.
John's Jesus (John 7:42) is said to be descended from David, but as with Paul, no other details are given.
So if we put it to a vote, three (Mark, Matthew, Luke) are not descended from David, and two (Paul, John) are said to be, but by bare assertion since we're not told how.
The numbers are against you.
And I can't see any reason at all why any mainstream Jew in Galilee or Judea should or would recognize Jesus as the Messiah, since he was neither a civil leader, a military leader, or a religious leader of the Jews.
Last edited: