I don't know much about Hinduism. Anandamurti rejects the religious theory of avatarism because it is illogical (and therefore invalid). I'm sure serious buddhists won't agree with the idea of Lord Buddha as a Hindu avatar.Thank you for this explanation.
This sounds like the Universal Manifestation of God.
No doubt you’ve connected the dots by now and realised Baha’is believe (those who know something about Hinduism at least) that Bahá’u’lláh is the 10th avatar of Vishnu/God or the Kalki Avatar. Buddha was also an Avatar.
If you see Lord Shiva and Lord Krishna through the Bahai cosmological lense, then that would be possible.If we accept the historic Shiva as you believe and the Baha’is can not discount the possibility, then the Dharmic lineage becomes Shiva, Krishna, Buddha then Bahá’u’lláh.
We would then have to consider why an Avatar of God has come out of Persia, not India.
This is all consistent with Baha’i cosmology IMHO.
Obviously the Baha’is see a few more. I’m presuming Anandamurti references are to Lord Shiva and Lord Krishna? Who else?
The third and last Mahakaula was Anandamurti as He demonstrated several times during the 1950's and 1960's.
He did not mention any more instances of a Mahakaula or personifications of Taraka Brahma.
If they had been there I am sure He would have mentioned them or written extensively about them.
Buddhistic teachings are also mentioned in some of the writings of Anandamurti but Lord Buddha was no Mahakaula.
There is nothing elitist about the teachings of Ananda Marga, anyone who has a human body can learn the meditation lessons and do the kiirtana. Without following Yama and Niyama sadhana is impossible but there are no special requirements to learn the yoga and meditation system. For people who prefer prayers and ritualism over sadhana, there are many religions to choose from instead.So while we may learn from the Hindu mystics to access these potent forces the needs of humanity take precedence over an elite few attaining enlightenment.
That may well happen in the next religious era along with universal vegetarianism lol.
Bahá’u’lláh asked the monks to come out of seclusion and assist humanity. Mysticism and living a practical good life are complimentary. I think your focus is on mysticism. The focus for the Baha’is is to create a more cohesive just and unified world. Mysticism is the means through which we will affect that spiritual transformation both within ourselves and our communities.
I became a vegetarian only about six months after I got my initiation into sadhana, you are stimulated to only practise what you understand or actually experience as useful or positive and not take anything for granted.
As you can see from the yantra (pratiik) of AMPS, the mission stresses a balance between "innercises and outercises" (service to humanity) and discourages a lifestyle of turning your back on the needs of society. There is no place in AMPS for people who want to stay in a cave in the Himalaya or in a jungle and forget about the practical world.
It was the social service side of Christianity that was integrated into AMPS, so there is no "otherworldliness" in the path and also monks and nuns are hard workers.
Last edited: