Fish-Hunter
Rejoice in the Lord!
The trinity is not Biblical, therefore i disagree. see thread "is the trinity biblical"
Interesting... are you a Unitarian Christian? Do you believe Jesus was God in the flesh?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The trinity is not Biblical, therefore i disagree. see thread "is the trinity biblical"
Interesting... are you a Unitarian Christian? Do you believe Jesus was God in the flesh?
I am not a unitarian Christian, I am a Chrsitian biblically speaking. Jesus is God distinct and seperate from the Father, the Word that "became" flesh. I believe that because it is written and because i understand the rationale of it.
So you see Jesus as a separate and distinct from the Father? Do you worship two different Gods?
When I look at the stars on a clear night, I am humbled. We are but a speck in space...almost a meaningless speck when compared to the known size of the cosmos. Who knows how far the universe expands, or how big it really is? Are you saying the cosmos has no begining? How did you come up with that conclusion? If you can answer that question dogmatically, does that make you God in a way?
Really?
Just how was this "proven" and by whom?
IF your reply is going to rely upon the Forer Effect, please disregard me whole post.
Just as I thought.22:5 O mankind! if ye have a doubt about the Resurrection, (consider) that We created you out of dust, then out of sperm, then out of a leech-like clot, then out of a morsel of flesh, partly formed and partly unformed, in order that We may manifest (our power) to you; and We cause whom We will to rest in the wombs for an appointed term, then do We bring you out as babes, then (foster you) that ye may reach your age of full strength; and some of you are called to die, and some are sent back to the feeblest old age, so that they know nothing after having known (much), and (further), thou seest the earth barren and lifeless, but when We pour down rain on it, it is stirred (to life), it swells, and it puts forth every kind of beautiful growth (in pairs).
Who told Mohammad the illiterate about those stages in the womb?? Science only discovered those stages in our modern time
I think I read in the Qu'ran that Jesus did not die at the cross. Therefore, Jesus was not resurrected from the dead.If this is true, how can the Bible and Qu'ran both be true?
What do you mean by "different"?
The bible describes Jesus as seperate and distinct from the father, its not a personal conclusion.
I worship the Father through Christ as it is written.
imagine doing that ten thousand years ago, looking up in wonder, and coming to the conclusion that it muast be the realm of the gods, but you are different for example you know that the stars are stars you understand the basic principle of us living on a planet in the solar system. now how big it is or did it have a begining are questions that cannot be answered at the moment so asigning a God to fill in the question box is not really my thing and i must admit however fascinating it is i dont feel the need to have an answer.
the same with death wether we go to heaven hell or valhalla is not known because except for some unproven stories generally no one comes back to tell us, and again i dont feel the need for an answer it will come in the end when i die, so realy its not the questions its the need to answer them that people have.
I tend to concentrate on the here and now, you know the mundane , work my home the kids etc etc. i wouldnt say i am an atheist, Iam a just dont knower.
Not exactly. The verse in context is talking about Jewish responsibiity for the death of Jesus. He states that the Jews did not kill or crucify Him. However a close inspection of the crucifixion in the Bible shows that Jesus did not die but left the body and then the body died.
This is a false conclusion. It was only necessary for the body to die for a resurrection to take place. And Jesus didn't even have to hang around because He had three days to do things like visit the spirits in the grave and give them the good news.
Because things can be seen from God's point of view instead of man's point of view. The myth that Muslims sometimes proliferate is that another person was substituted for Jesus on the cross. I think the source of this is a heretical gnostic book.
To save another post, I will answer tour question about the Qu'ran. The Qu'ran was given to Arabs as a clear path (That they wouldn't have to adhere to a Jewish book to get to). God does speak about Biblical characters inthe Qu'ran but in a way that Arabs can accept as their own information. The references to Jesus do appear to have the characteristics of God addressing problems in the early Christian church ie The Doctrine of the Trinity (which is non-Biblical), a tendency towards Jew bashing over the crucifixion, doubts about the miracle virgin birth of Jesus to mention a few.
Just as I thought.
You rely upon the Forer Effect to promote your beliefs.
Been there, done that.
You bring nothing new to the table.
This is old hat that has been thoroughly refuted in several other threads.
I do have to wonder why you go out of your way to present Mohammad as being stupid/retarded/dimwitted/etc.
He was illiterate, meaning he could not read, not stupid/retarded/dim witted/etc.
Perhaps it is merely to help you sell your belief system?
Oh Yeah,
You didn't answer the question:Just how was this "proven" and by whom?And if you think that your Forer Effect response was an answer...
I wanted to know WHO proved it and HOW they proved it.
Don't feel bad Fish Hunter is ingoring me he thinks that I hate his God because I proved that Buddha taught the same thing that Jesus did. Guess it didn't like that....:faint:
I'm not ignoring you. I guess there's not much to discuss with you.
Your right truth is a terrible thing.....:sorry1:
Do you believe in absolute truth, and are you the infallible source of absolute truth? That woud make you God with an affirmative answer.
What I told you about the teachings of Buddda are true you don't have to be a God to know this just do some research.
I heard Buddah was an agnostic. Do you know if that's true?