Augustus
…
Historically, the Chinese valued both practical and pure learning. I think that was a major reason they were once the world's leading nations, and a major reason why they will again be so. To only value practical learning will eventually place America in China's dust.
Historically (pre-industrial), the education system in China was designed to tie the elite into the Confucian state. Knowledge was linked to governance, tradition, prestige or practical application rather than being an end in itself.
The stability and centralisation this produced was why China was so advanced for so long, yet was late industrialising and didn't develop the modern scientific methods that emerged in Europe from the late Medieval through Enlightenment periods. Science was ultimately about practical results, and while many people today might think of Confucianism as being more amenable to scientific enquiry than Christianity, the opposite was really true historically.
Confucian learning was mostly either purely practical, or literally elitist, whereas in Europe universities developed as centres of independent scholarship.