• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why Would Humans Be Important to God?

sandandfoam

Veteran Member
What is the point of worship if God isn't going to be listening anyway?
Same answer as above - worship is about the worshipper
edit - Also worth pointing out that if I imagine God is listening, or it seems to me that God is listening then to all intents and purposes God is listening.
 
Last edited:

DavyCrocket2003

Well-Known Member
Looking at the size, age, and inhospitability of the universe, what rationale is there to think that, if there is some type of god entity, that human beings would be of any importance to it? What rationale exists to even suggest that an entity of such power and scale would even be aware of one species, that has existed on one infinitesimal speck, for an immeasurably brief flash of time?

None that I can think of. Without such a hypothetical being communicating with us, I don't think we can come up with an independent reason for it to care about us. For all we know, it could hate us. For all we know, it is unaware of us. For all we know, it doesn't exist. For all we know, it doesn't even "think" in a way that allows it to hold things as important. We really know nothing about it, sorry.
 

Tathagata

Freethinker
Importance is a human concept - if I thought God considered anything important I would be talking about me not God.

That's a semantic gripe and really, it makes no sense and is of no use in intellectual discourse.

When we say "important," it doesn't mean that we are ascribing our concept of "importance" to God, but rather using the word "importance" to communicate information to eachother as to what are "importance" is to God.



.
 

Tathagata

Freethinker
It makes no sense to you that whatever I would attribute to God speaks of me not God?

Well, first of all, your notion of God IS God because he hasn't been demonstrated to be part of reality. You can't assume the existence of something (a projection of your mind) and then say your notion of God (a projection of your mind) doesn't accurately represent the God you have already assumed (a projection of your mind). This is despite whether God actually exists or not, because I'm going based on our current knowledge.

Also, what you're saying can be applied to anything. For example, a banana. You can give a banana attributes and tell someone about it, but those are attributes according to and percieved by you, but don't actually represent the banana in reality. A person must (figuritively speaking) taste the banana to truly know it's attributes and not just hear someones description of it.

But for all intensive and useful purposes, we must still use language to communicate.


.
 

sandandfoam

Veteran Member
Well, first of all, your notion of God IS God.
Agreed

because he hasn't been demonstrated to be part of reality.
I'm not a believer that objective reality is knowable to human beings. For us reality is perception and language.
We can demonstrate lot's of things to each other but we create them between us. These things may or may not exist apart from us. We cannot know. I believe we can experience reality - but that is a belief.



You can't assume the existence of something (a projection of your mind) and then say your notion of God (a projection of your mind) doesn't accurately represent the God you have already assumed (a projection of your mind) .
Why can't I?
I believe in objective reality - I believe in God, God is a way that I can make sense through myth of that reality. God/reality is incomprehensible to me. But I feel as if I experience both. It may not work for you that I can make sense of my world through myth, at the same time recognizing that my myths are no more than the products of my mind, but I find myself with no better alternative and it seems to work well for me.

This is despite whether God actually exists or not, because I'm going based on our current knowledge.

At the outset you said that my notion of God is God. That remains my position

Also, what you're saying can be applied to anything. For example, a banana. You can give a banana attributes and tell someone about it, but those are attributes according to and percieved by you, but don't actually represent the banana in reality. A person must (figuritively speaking) taste the banana to truly know it's attributes and not just hear someones description of it.

And we can never know if we are tasting the same thing for we are trapped in our bodies and we all see the world as we are


But for all intensive and useful purposes, we must still use language to communicate.

Indeed. But language is not a repository of meaning. Meaning is created between us.
 

Eliot Wild

Irreverent Agnostic Jerk
Does this mean that God does not prioritize?


No He doesn't, and He has trouble multi-tasking as well. Plus, His communication skills are elementary, at best, and He is equally lacking in customer service and time management abilities. Believe me, I'll never use Him as an intern again.
 

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
No, and He has trouble multi-tasking as well. Plus, His communication skills are elementary, at best, and He is equally lacking in customer service and time management abilities. Believe me, I'll never use Him as an intern again.

You get what you pay for. Live and learn my friend.
 
Top