Corvus
Feathered eyeball connoisseur
I am done with you. You are being willfully absurd.Prove it.
("Prove it" means state the proposition, substantiate the the proposition is true, then make the deduction.)
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I am done with you. You are being willfully absurd.Prove it.
("Prove it" means state the proposition, substantiate the the proposition is true, then make the deduction.)
OK, got it. I was thinking something else entirely.His premise is that when we meet intelligent life in the universe, it will probably have already advance to a non-organic stage. Earth is either too young or too backward I suppose.
If all production of all products is automated, then how will humans earn a living?
If someone is going to provide me with food, shelter, clothing, electricity, internet, phone, transportation, etc., for free, I'm good with that. I just can't envision how that system is going to work.That type of system would become obsolete obviously.
Illogical. An exact hypothetical copy of a living human brain, functionally, just materially different, ie inorganic. Would be by definition sentient.
No, serious. Musk said everything will be automated, which will produce "social destabilization".Now you are being silly.If all production of all products is automated, then how will humans earn a living?
You are free to scurry off. Challenging someone to prove their absurd claims is not absurd.I am done with you. You are being willfully absurd.
With full automation of all production, your physical labour is largely superflous to requirements there, however that will free humanity, eventually, from the drudgery of work and self sufficiency, allowing humans to pursue leisure exploration science the arts and various vocations. Are you an Ayn Rand devotee by any chance? Something tells me you might be.If someone is going to provide me with food, shelter, clothing, electricity, internet, phone, transportation, etc., for free, I'm good with that. I just can't envision how that system is going to work.
You are asking me to a prove a hypothesis? Really? It's logically consistent enough, if you don't agree, fine, like Burger King, have it your way. I don't really care. So there.You are free to scurry off. Challenging someone to prove their absurd claims is not absurd.
I have no idea. I did find this short film entertaining: The intelligence explosion: how do you stop a robot from turning evil? – original drama videoTrue or false: The only way that machines will be a threat to humans is by machines developing or having a will of their own--in order to somehow prevent humans from unplugging them.
I can't see how you could conclude otherwise, if the replica was 'exact' in every detail, but just using different non organic materials by design that emulate the same neurological architecture and processes, as organic human brains and rest of the nervous system.The brain is just a part of this. If we could duplicate the CNS, would the result be self aware?
Musk said that "the robots will do everything, bar nothing." Apparently you disagree.With full automation of all production, your physical labour is largely superflous to requirements there, however that will free humanity, eventually, from the drudgery of work and self sufficiency, allowing humans to pursue leisure exploration science the arts and various vocations.
Your intuitions are quite wrong.Are you an Ayn Rand devotee by any chance? Something tells me you might be.
They will do everything that is cost inefficient for humans to do. Humans will still have plenty of things to do. Human produced items, hand made and bespoke goods as well as services, might fetch a premium. As luxury goods/services.Musk said that "the robots will do everything, bar nothing." Apparently you disagree.
Good.Your intuitions are quite wrong.
That's excellent! I'm Lucy.I have no idea. I did find this short film entertaining: The intelligence explosion: how do you stop a robot from turning evil? – original drama video
Glad you liked it. The unplugging comment sparked a memory. I'm closer to Lucy's position too.That's excellent! I'm Lucy.
Your proposition was: "An exact hypothetical copy of a living human brain, functionally, just materially different, ie inorganic. Would be by definition sentient." The challenge is for you to prove that your claim is true.You are asking me to a prove a hypothesis?
I gotta say, having opinions similar to yours is always reassuring to me.Glad you liked it. The unplugging comment sparked a memory. I'm closer to Lucy's position too.
You want me to make a functional synthetic copy of a human brain?Your proposition was: "An exact hypothetical copy of a living human brain, functionally, just materially different, ie inorganic. Would be by definition sentient." The challenge is for you to prove that your claim is true.