Terry Sampson
Well-Known Member
last well known examples of Rabbis who would "exorcise" these souls in Europe and the Middle East were in the first half of the 20th century.
Hmmm, ... the Christian concept must be "a Gentile thing".
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
last well known examples of Rabbis who would "exorcise" these souls in Europe and the Middle East were in the first half of the 20th century.
I don't think that's a fair description at all. The Hassidic masters were master kabbalists one and all. What they were known for interpreting esoteric kabbalistic concepts into practical terms in order to make them accessible to the uneducated layman. But for the educated, it remained in it's abstract form. And not all Hassidic Rabbis did that either.indeed, the hermetic lore and arcane erudition of the medieval Cabalists was turned upside down by Chasidism, which preaches plain and direct understanding of religion—especially by the uneducated.
I don't think that's right either. The dibuk isn't a European concept, nor is it exclusive to Hassidism.A crucial factor in Chasidic life is the tsáddik (or rébbe or guter-yíd), the “guru” of a sect: and Chasidic literature, both oral and written, is replete with paeans to and legends about these leaders. A background for the world of A Dybbuk can be partly found in the narratives translated here.
I don't know why it's necessary to frame it as "Gentile" instead of "Christian". I'm not sure exactly what the Christian concept entails, but the general idea seems to be similar.Hmmm, ... the Christian concept must be "a Gentile thing".
Point taken. For the record, I was quoting the intro to Neugroschel's book. I suppose I should have put in a disclaimer to distinguish my beliefs and opinions from those of the Intro's author. I'll try to remember to do so in the future. Personally, I agree wholeheartedly with Tumah's objections to certain portions of the Intro.This definition is not the consensus... I think it's important to point out.
Maybe ask about it here in the Judaism-Dir.
Well, in common vernacular, it's just a regular old compliment. No different than someone saying, "you're a gentleman and a scholar"I esteem the Tzaddik more highly than all of God's other creatures. Start a thread in Judaism DIR, and I'll start a One-on-One with somebody someday. Been meaning to anyway.; it's on my bucket-list.
What is? Tzaddik?it's just a regular old compliment.
Yeah.What is? Tzaddik?
Meet me in a One-on-One, and I'll see if I can disabuse you of that belief.Yeah.
How else would you understand a "tzaddik"?Meet me in a One-on-One, and I'll see if I can disabuse you of that belief.
Do you want to meet me in a One-on-One with @dybmh ? I'm on your turf here.How else would you understand a "tzaddik"?
Sure, but I'm not really sure what there is to discuss.Do you want to meet me in a One-on-One with @dybmh ? I'm on your turf here.
Sure, but I'm not really sure what there is to discuss.
, andin common vernacular, "Tzaddik" iss just a regular old compliment. No different than someone saying, "you're a gentleman and a scholar"
Sure, okay. Still a bit skeptical though about how far the three of us could go with this.How's that for a start? Interest you?
- Discuss what there is to discuss; and
- Whether or not,
, and
- Whether or not there's a lot more to the label, beyond "the common vernacular.
Still a bit skeptical though about how far the three of us could go with this.
Ha! You wanna load up on ammunition, eh? You won't need much; all I've got is a slingshot and a couple of rocks.I got this