Sorry, I tried to use multi-quote, but it barfed on me.
You too?
I think RF installed that 'feature' as a practical joke.
The NPR point is one that merits consideration, and I'd agree federally funded programming is not a good idea.
Still doesn't substantiate anything as far reaching as a corrupt media.
There might be a language problem here.
By "corrupt", I mean not just intentional misrepresentation, but mostly sloppy journalism driven by partisanshuip.
As for turning the tables, where I claim that what you verified ISN'T cromulent. . . LOL.
Don't we athiests make fun of religious folk for making unsubstantiated claims and then asking us to prove they aren't wrong?
I observe media bias.
But I don't observe, angels, miracles, or gods.
Bias is an interesting phenomenon. We notice it more when it works against us.
We notice it less when we like it. This latter one I watch for. I like some of the
agendas in news....opposition to child molestation, scientific advances being good,
rooting out government corruption. I'm fallible....I buy into these things I like.
So I look for anything suspicious there. Sometimes I find it. Yes, that sucks.
So it's a good idea to be wary of bias one likes.