I don't know.
No one should claim to.
But he does have a valid point about media corruption.
I've seen them misquote him & use other tricks to actively campaign against him.
Right.
But the Trump admistration's aggressive stance against "unfair media" suggests that they do claim to know how to differentiate.
You also say he has a valid point about media corruption. . . what makes it valid? What misquoting did
you see? What tricks did
you see used? What do you mean by actively campaigning? What does non-active campaigning look like?
Does it matter which outlets are biased and which are not? Does it matter how often? Does it matter if it was a specific journalist? Is there a scale at the degree of bias that your seeing, 1-10? Did you observe the reporting of enough outlets to make the general
claim that the media is corrupt, as some kind of whole? How many media outlets are you tracking right now?
I am not trying to be pedantic here. I'm trying to illustrate just how unsubstantiated all of this "media bias" stuff really is.
Maybe there is some bias. . . but again, without any kind of objective methodology to determine bias or lack thereof, how can you make that claim?
The Trump administration has no trouble making that claim, as do many of his supporters. . . if Trump uses these claims to justify restricting media access to his office, then the process of journalistic censorship has already started.