Don't call him Shirley.
(This problem is becoming epidemic.)
Well, he Shirley has a problem with my reasons for not supporting Hillary.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Don't call him Shirley.
(This problem is becoming epidemic.)
I think we are able to write in a vote. Oh! Wouldn't it be funny if we could vote in Revoltingest?Were I an American voter and it came to choosing between her and any GOP candidate? Sure.
I can't picture me voting Republican at all. I am disappointed that the GOP did not get Hillary.
Ah, knew I was right. No response to facts there tytlyf??????Awesome, surely you have some names? Were they in the recent Benghazi movie?
What facts? The fact republicans politicized the deaths of 4 Americans for over 3 years to take down Hillary long before the presidential race? It's a phony scandal from the RW phony establishment media.Ah, knew I was right. No response to facts there tytlyf??????
Me as prez?I think we are able to write in a vote. Oh! Wouldn't it be funny if we could vote in Revoltingest?
Me as prez?
Compared to me, Trump would look cuddly & hyper-intelligent.
What facts? The fact republicans politicized the deaths of 4 Americans for over 3 years to take down Hillary long before the presidential race? It's a phony scandal from the RW phony establishment media.
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/250237-gop-embassy-security-cuts-draw-democrats-scrutiny
Ambassador Stevens was missing from the embassy within the first 20 minutes of the attack. There were local security teams who fought and killed over 100 attackers during the episode. Some of the 4 were not killed by militants, but by smoke inhalation.I guess you have a problem reading. Seems that you presented some statements that are not true or should I say totally misleading. How about answering post #43. But I guess since they disagree with your "facts" they must be "RW" propaganda.
Republicans in congress were the ones who cut embassy spending anyways which led to the situation with less security at American embassies around the world.
So, you seem to say that Republican's cut embassy spending which led to inadequate security measures at Benghazi. I sure don't know where your getting your information from but I think you had better get a new source; the "It's All The Republican's Fault" crowed seems to have over influenced your thought process. Let's look at some "Facts"
www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42834.pdf
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/12/politics/fact-check-benghazi-security/
Look real close at the numbers in the following article
http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...farrow-says-inadequate-security-funding-cong/
it seems that funding from 2008 to 2012 went from $2127.7 million to $4076.2 million. I really don't see a "cut" here. But of course the left wingers can play with numbers and confuse many that blindly follow them.
Now let's look at more "Facts"
From http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/...ad-less-than-standard-security-before-attack/
Now who's fault was this? Sure wasn't the Republicans. Looks like the "fault" lies with the State Department. I do believe the Sec State is the senior person at State. Who was the Secretary of State at this time.?
Now ask yourself a question. Would any intelligent person not look at the conditions in Libya and say to themselves. " Situation in Libya with numerous groups opposed to the U.S. and the anniversary of 9-11 dictates that this post be closed down, just as the British closed theirs, until additional resources can be brought to bear. Seems that the Hillary was a more preoccupied with other matters, or that her performance at State left a lot to be desired.
Awesome, surely you have some names? Were they in the recent Benghazi movie?
I'd be careful of your media, they work for special interests.
Correct, there were security forces there defending the embassy. It's common to have local 'militias' provide security at foreign embassies across the world.Just Google it. All the names from our Ambassador that was killed there to the contractors that were killed as well as those who fought and survived are easily looked up from many different sources. No "vast right wing conspiracy" here. You may feel that Hillary has no share of the blame for this tragic event. That's your business. But it certainly wasn't because someone made a stupid video that insulted Islam as she stated as a fact shortly after. (There are much worse videos than that on you tube.) And she knew better.
Afraid to answer my challenge I see. Hillary is at fault for Benghazi, but not in the way some think. Again are you afraid to respond to post #73Correct, there were security forces there defending the embassy. It's common to have local 'militias' provide security at foreign embassies across the world.
Has nothing to do with Hillary. 10+ hours and republicans got nothing. It's 100% political
I already did. Now let's talk about why you didn't care about the 60 American lives lost at embassies during the Bush destructive years?Afraid to answer my challenge I see. Hillary is at fault for Benghazi, but not in the way some think. Again are you afraid to respond to post #73
To tell another poster what he doesn't care about is presumptuous & combative.I already did. Now let's talk about why you didn't care about the 60 American lives lost at embassies during the Bush destructive years?
No you have not responded to my questions in Post #43 and reiterated in post #73. As the Rev said this post is about Hillary's resume for President.I already did. Now let's talk about why you didn't care about the 60 American lives lost at embassies during the Bush destructive years?