• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Would You Vote For Hillary?

Would you vote for Hillary?

  • Yes

    Votes: 13 38.2%
  • No

    Votes: 21 61.8%

  • Total voters
    34

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Were I an American voter and it came to choosing between her and any GOP candidate? Sure.

I can't picture me voting Republican at all. I am disappointed that the GOP did not get Hillary.
 

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Were I an American voter and it came to choosing between her and any GOP candidate? Sure.

I can't picture me voting Republican at all. I am disappointed that the GOP did not get Hillary.
I think we are able to write in a vote. Oh! Wouldn't it be funny if we could vote in Revoltingest?
 

Underhill

Well-Known Member
She's certainly not my first choice, but between her and trump or cruz? Sure.

But there are republicans I would rather vote for than her. Which is why I scratch my head over this primary. Republicans could be walking away with the presidency. As it sits now, it doesn't matter if it's Trump or Cruz, it will be a battle.
 

Wu Wei

ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
Me as prez?
Compared to me, Trump would look cuddly & hyper-intelligent.

True, and likely smells better to....but I'm there as security should you decide to run.....that way we can make Trump rallies look like a love fest

d7bacae544a825012afe460c7d0bb2cc.jpg
 

esmith

Veteran Member
What facts? The fact republicans politicized the deaths of 4 Americans for over 3 years to take down Hillary long before the presidential race? It's a phony scandal from the RW phony establishment media.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/250237-gop-embassy-security-cuts-draw-democrats-scrutiny

I guess you have a problem reading. Seems that you presented some statements that are not true or should I say totally misleading. How about answering post #43. But I guess since they disagree with your "facts" they must be "RW" propaganda.
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
I guess you have a problem reading. Seems that you presented some statements that are not true or should I say totally misleading. How about answering post #43. But I guess since they disagree with your "facts" they must be "RW" propaganda.
Ambassador Stevens was missing from the embassy within the first 20 minutes of the attack. There were local security teams who fought and killed over 100 attackers during the episode. Some of the 4 were not killed by militants, but by smoke inhalation.

Fact remains, Benghazi is nothing more than a phony political scandal to attack democrats. Republicans are desperate. Hillary testified multiple times and still the republicans found no wrong doing and no stand down order. I'd be careful of your media, they work for special interests.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
Seems you are missing the point of my accusation. Let's take a close look at what you said that is misleading. Now I'm going to edit your post and mine that are not germane to the issue and remove portions that I'm not addressing.


Republicans in congress were the ones who cut embassy spending anyways which led to the situation with less security at American embassies around the world.

So, you seem to say that Republican's cut embassy spending which led to inadequate security measures at Benghazi. I sure don't know where your getting your information from but I think you had better get a new source; the "It's All The Republican's Fault" crowed seems to have over influenced your thought process. Let's look at some "Facts"
www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42834.pdf
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/12/politics/fact-check-benghazi-security/

Look real close at the numbers in the following article
http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...farrow-says-inadequate-security-funding-cong/
it seems that funding from 2008 to 2012 went from $2127.7 million to $4076.2 million. I really don't see a "cut" here. But of course the left wingers can play with numbers and confuse many that blindly follow them.

Now let's look at more "Facts"
From http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/...ad-less-than-standard-security-before-attack/

Now who's fault was this? Sure wasn't the Republicans. Looks like the "fault" lies with the State Department. I do believe the Sec State is the senior person at State. Who was the Secretary of State at this time.?

Now ask yourself a question. Would any intelligent person not look at the conditions in Libya and say to themselves. " Situation in Libya with numerous groups opposed to the U.S. and the anniversary of 9-11 dictates that this post be closed down, just as the British closed theirs, until additional resources can be brought to bear. Seems that the Hillary was a more preoccupied with other matters, or that her performance at State left a lot to be desired.

The above is what I'm addressing.
Want to change your statement that it was the Republicans fault for Benghazi? Or, I'll make it easier on you. Do you still say it was the Republicans that "Cut" funds for the State Dept for Security. in light of the fact: funding from 2008 to 2012 went from $2127.7 million to $4076.2 million

Now after reading the article "security.blogs.cnn" do you have a answer to my highlighted comments following that link?





.
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Awesome, surely you have some names? Were they in the recent Benghazi movie?

Just Google it. All the names from our Ambassador that was killed there to the contractors that were killed as well as those who fought and survived are easily looked up from many different sources. No "vast right wing conspiracy" here. You may feel that Hillary has no share of the blame for this tragic event. That's your business. But it certainly wasn't because someone made a stupid video that insulted Islam as she stated as a fact shortly after. (There are much worse videos than that on you tube.) And she knew better.
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
Just Google it. All the names from our Ambassador that was killed there to the contractors that were killed as well as those who fought and survived are easily looked up from many different sources. No "vast right wing conspiracy" here. You may feel that Hillary has no share of the blame for this tragic event. That's your business. But it certainly wasn't because someone made a stupid video that insulted Islam as she stated as a fact shortly after. (There are much worse videos than that on you tube.) And she knew better.
Correct, there were security forces there defending the embassy. It's common to have local 'militias' provide security at foreign embassies across the world.

Has nothing to do with Hillary. 10+ hours and republicans got nothing. It's 100% political
 

esmith

Veteran Member
Correct, there were security forces there defending the embassy. It's common to have local 'militias' provide security at foreign embassies across the world.

Has nothing to do with Hillary. 10+ hours and republicans got nothing. It's 100% political
Afraid to answer my challenge I see. Hillary is at fault for Benghazi, but not in the way some think. Again are you afraid to respond to post #73
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
Afraid to answer my challenge I see. Hillary is at fault for Benghazi, but not in the way some think. Again are you afraid to respond to post #73
I already did. Now let's talk about why you didn't care about the 60 American lives lost at embassies during the Bush destructive years?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I already did. Now let's talk about why you didn't care about the 60 American lives lost at embassies during the Bush destructive years?
To tell another poster what he doesn't care about is presumptuous & combative.
This risks derailing the thread.
Let's keep the discussion about Hillary & the election...not about the other posters.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
I already did. Now let's talk about why you didn't care about the 60 American lives lost at embassies during the Bush destructive years?
No you have not responded to my questions in Post #43 and reiterated in post #73. As the Rev said this post is about Hillary's resume for President.
 
Top