WyattDerp
Active Member
You know, there's nothing in Song of Songs that says that the lovers are married. The term of affection achoti kallah, which tends to be overly-literally translated as "my sister, my bride," actually was idiomatic, and does not mean that the woman is literally his bride, any more than she was literally his sister. It's like in colloquial English, if I call a girl "my baby," I mean it as an endearing way of saying she is my girlfriend, not that she is literally my infant.
Okay, but to me it's clearly about two people being rather significant others to each other. I personally find that more marriage-like than "technical" marriage. If that makes any sense, I think one should, if anything, legally marry the person one's heart is married to -- but that marriage of the heart comes before anything, and kind of makes legal marriage redundant. That's just a piece of paper after the fact..
But of course that's just personal opinion that wouldn't enter the "legality" of the text ^^ So thanks for clearing that up!