See post #34. (This thread is fast becoming an embarrassing waste of time.)May I ask where you are getting these bizarre ideas from?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
See post #34. (This thread is fast becoming an embarrassing waste of time.)May I ask where you are getting these bizarre ideas from?
Do you know the difference between a priest and a sage?You claim Ptolemy didn't commission 70 or 72 priests, can you tell me more about what happened?
now look up "priest" in terms of Judaism and you will see why I said "no" to 70 (72) PRIESTS.Oh sages definition means scholars am I correct, I looked up the word sages.
Yes. I can find nothing to suggest that Bharat Jhunjhunwala is a credible source on any topic other than, perhaps, economics.
Did I mention that the etiological tale regarding the Greek translation of the Torah is, as far as I can discern, precisely that, i.e., a legend.
Share whatever you wish, just don't expect us to take the source seriously.I hope its ok to share in this forum this book, as you were asking me where I learn about Mitsrayim that Ptolemy was asking about
shorturl.at/apwX4Sentence number two is incoherent (because the Indus Valley is nowhere near Missouri).
I meant no corroboration of them being enslaved in Egypt.Are you kidding me? All three words (Hebrews, Israelites and Jews) refer to the same tribal people. It's like saying the Navajo and Dineh are the same.
The book seems to conflate the persons of the Torah with persons in Hinduism. This is just whack at face value. Abraham moved to Canaan, a territory in the Levant. That's nowhere even near the Indus Valley.Awe ok so you say its a legend: looking up the word legend; 'popularly regarded as historical although not verifiable'. I still hadn't yet looked into Greeks, it confuses me., I yet need to understand Greeks., Actually Greeks confuses me., example: when I think Greek I think of Greece., yet when ever I hear the word Greek, I learn Greeks in Northern Africa., and Rome which is Italy? Then Rome does what with Israel., anyways, I have a long ways to go yet., one of the reasons why I label my religion as Learning. However the book that I'll paste below., only speaks about Torah and the similarities of Prophets. I hope its ok to share in this forum this book, as you were asking me where I learn about Mitsrayim that Ptolemy was asking about
Here's the book at Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/Common-Prophets-Christians-Muslims-Hindus-ebook/dp/B07TC4WBH2/ref=sr_1_1?crid=311AZ2QEES72V&keywords=Common+Prophets+Of+the+Jews,+Christians,+Muslims+and+Hindus+Bharat+Jhunjhunwala&qid=1659736711&sprefix=common+prophets+of+the+jews,+christians,+muslims+and+hindus+bharat+jhunjhunwala,aps,211&sr=8-1
Share whatever you wish, just don't expect us to take the source seriously.
There is also a difference between sharing an unsubstantiated claim and asking a question that presumes that claim to be true. So, for example:
Sentence number one in simply wrong. Sentence number two is incoherent (because the Indus Valley is nowhere near Missouri).
- I read that the Indus Valley was in Missouri.
- Why were the Lewis and Clark expedition meet in the Indus Valley and travel up the Missouri River?
The book seems to conflate the persons of the Torah with persons in Hinduism. This is just whack at face value. Abraham moved to Canaan, a territory in the Levant. That's nowhere even near the Indus Valley.
Which Hebrews? When? Left where? WTF is, or are, mitsrayim?
What the hell are you talking about?
What historical evidence is there this hypothesis? Can you refer me to any reputable links where I can read about this?Mitsrayim is in Indus Valley India., during Exodus era Hebrews left Indus Valley India and travel to Canaan Yisrael. Before Exodus era Hebrews Yadavas lived in Indus Valley India. I hope this helps understand where I'm navigating from.
Tribal identity among Jews is not determined by genetics. If you have a Jewish mom, OR if you are a lawful convert, you are a Jew. So for example, if you have a Jewish father and non-Jewish mom, you are not a Jew. But if you have a Jewish mom and a non-Jewish father, you are 100% Jew.
Jews have nothing to do with the Yadavas. The Yadavahs were just another non-Jewish people.
May I ask where you are getting these bizarre ideas from?
I know I'm not listing the book again., but earlier in this thread I was kindly asked, as the person extremely wanted to know where I gotten these ideas., no there not my ideas., I read a book., I had questions, and its a discussion.
What historical evidence is there this hypothesis? Can you refer me to any reputable links where I can read about this?
The conventional historical view, as I understand it, is that the Hebrews/Israelites lived in Canaan more or less throughout, apart from a period of captivity in Babylon. Some appear to have been slaves in Egypt, possibly giving rise to the Exodus myth.
But I can see that there would have been trade between this Indus civilisation and Mesopotamia, and so no doubt cultural influences as well.
Yadavas Hebrews were farmers. How come Jews thought Hebrews were slaves?
How come Greek Ptolemy Ruler of KMT added the modern name Egypt to the Torah, did Ptolemy know this word Egypt? Can you imagine the name America in the Torah? Who chooses to add to Torah?
Well, allegedly. There seems to be no corroborating historical evidence of that.
The book seems to conflate the persons of the Torah with persons in Hinduism. This is just whack at face value. Abraham moved to Canaan, a territory in the Levant. That's nowhere even near the Indus Valley.