If so, please quote from Yajurveda. Right?
Wrong. You know the words, mistranslated as they are but you don't know the context. Stop, just stop.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If so, please quote from Yajurveda. Right?
Please give the verses where their context has been given. The context is not in some preceding and some following verses, as is usual for a book. If I missed, please give the verses number where the context is. One may use for the context the translation that one likes most.Right?PleaseWrong. You know the words, mistranslated as they are but you don't know the context. Stop, just stop.
There was a discussion going in the Hinduism DIR Forum, please refer to post #33 of the forum, one poster believed that Western translations of Veda was unbiased while the other did not believe it . I decided to go for a translation by a Hindu. I googled and incidentally the only translation in English available by a Hindu was of Yajurveda by Devi Chand in the public domain. So, I started reading it.Why did you not start with the Rig Veda? Or, have you already read it? I ask because the Rig is usually seen as the oldest and therefore seems like the best place to start. How can you talk about what beliefs are "Vedic" and what is a later addition if you skip the very beginning?
Please give the verses where their context has been given. The context is not in some preceding and some following verses, as is usual for a book. If I missed, please give the verses number where the context is. One may use for the context the translation that one likes most.Right?Please
Regards
I googled and incidentally the only translation in English available by a Hindu was of Yajurveda by Devi Chand in the public domain. So, I started reading it.
Not necessarily. PleaseMakes sense. By chance, do you have access to a library that may have more translations available? I do not know your situation or even which country you live in. I do find it a little troubling how seldom people seem to think to take advantage of what a library offers. (This is not a rant at you specifically.) There are a great number of books and translations that are not available online. Any serious research into a subject will almost always require offline work.
Not necessarily. Please
Regards
I don't think it has any relevance to historical context :HISTORICAL CONTEXT.
Not everything is a verse.
If you limit your research into a subject by what you can find online, you really are not that interested.
Sorry! Veda/Yajurveda belong to the per-historic period as per History.
If Vedas existed before 650 B,C., then these don't have any written historical context as it would be just a conjecture as per History. Right? Please
Yes, I seem to remember buildings that had shelves and shelves of these piles of papers that were neatly stacked on the shelves. There were also long tables where we used to open these piles of papers, read through them, compare them, and write down things we found on our own Right!?
What were they called?
Oh yes! Libraries, books and notebooks!
When I was a kid, going to the library every two weeks was one of the best parts of life!