• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Yep . He is innocent again.

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Im not anti gun. If i was his GF or wife I would definitely own one . For self defense. Or his neighbor.
Im thinking of getting one (for myself) because one of his last offenses (since he murdered Trayvon) was within about 40 miles of my house .Forney Tx.
Murdered? Are you aware of the jury verdict?
Anyway, we've had multiple threads about this already, & there's no new ground to cover.
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
I must say that I find it pretty disturbing that people cling to guilt in the face of an acquittal. If we are going to label someone guilty because of gossip and prejudicial conduct then we are leaving the realm of actual evidence and would have many more innocent convicts.
 

DallasApple

Depends Upon My Mood..
I must say that I find it pretty disturbing that people cling to guilt in the face of an acquittal. If we are going to label someone guilty because of gossip and prejudicial conduct then we are leaving the realm of actual evidence and would have many more innocent convicts.

No its not "gossip" and prejudice. Its common sense.
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
No its not "gossip" and prejudice. Its common sense.

our system is supposed to protect those falsely accused. I guess it goes to show that one is not truly innocent until proven guilty. Once the accusation is substantiated not by verdict but by prosecution alone, then that person faces the punishment of having such an accusation linger over them for the rest of their lives.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
fantôme profane;3575881 said:
"perp"? What "perp" are you referring to?
At one point, Martin was standing over Zimmerman pummeling him.
Such a stance precludes self defense, so the term "perp" would apply.
 

BSM1

What? Me worry?
IMO the problem here is that lefties wish to equate "not guilty" with smart. Obviously George proves this not to be the case. BTW check out his GF. I think maybe she has a hidden agenda by being with someone like GZ.
 

Awoon

Well-Known Member
To some people, standing over a man pummeling him bloody is called "wearing a hoodie".
It helps them feel that the perp is an innocent little lamb.

In court this week I saw a video of a CO and a uniformed PO doing that to a prisoner in city jail. The prisoner was convicted of assault on the CO.
 

Epic Beard Man

Bearded Philosopher

Epic Beard Man

Bearded Philosopher
To some people, standing over a man pummeling him bloody is called "wearing a hoodie".
It helps them feel that the perp is an innocent little lamb.

Well, I'm not inviting him to Thanksgiving dinner this year.

You know I never understood GZ defenders they use words like "pummel" "attack" "thug" the latter seems to be overused nowadays. We weren't there. GZ could've said "I'm going to kill you" it's not Trayvon's fault that he was winning a street fight, oh wait I onced said that and a GZ supporter said he was ambushed lol
 
Top