PolyHedral
Superabacus Mystic
User #6006.Who is asking?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
User #6006.Who is asking?
User #6006.
No? How does a user at all relate to a self?User? So a self.
No? How does a user at all relate to a self?
That doesn't make sense; not all users are human. Conseqeuntly, not all users are aware that they are.User comes after self. The awareness is "I am user".
That doesn't make sense; not all users are human. Conseqeuntly, not all users are aware that they are.
Neither did post #481. It answered the question you asked, though.Such users do not assert "I am user", like you did.
Laugh again. :biglaugh:
Neither did post #481. It answered the question you asked, though.
Of course it does; "You" identifies an entity. What other entities are identified is irrelavent.You? The third person does not occur without the first person.
Of course it does; "You" identifies an entity. What other entities are identified is irrelavent.
No, an entity identifies "you." It does not require to think of itself to do so.'You' does not identify the 'you'. The subject "I" identifies 'you'.
No, an entity identifies "you." It does not require to think of itself to do so.
In sleep you are thinking your just not able to recall it when you wake up because sleep physically cuts off your conscious awareness(at least it's supposed to otherwise you might go sleep walking sleep talk or other possible hazards).Thinking is only absent in deep sleep. Identify a 'you' there.
In sleep you are thinking your just not able to recall it when you wake up because sleep physically cuts off your conscious awareness(at least it's supposed to otherwise you might go sleep walking sleep talk or other possible hazards).
Why must thinking be of itself?Thinking is only absent in deep sleep. Identify a 'you' there.
There's an interesting thought. :slap:Why must thinking be of itself?
Why must thinking be of itself?
That is Buddha's realm. But your question is based on assumption of itself.
Buddha was not a God.
But he had experience of objectless shunyata. From that vantage point the individual self is automatically negated, but unborn reality is not.