Perhaps. But true nonethelessYes it's tacky.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Perhaps. But true nonethelessYes it's tacky.
According to a Daily Beast article, Man Who Tweeted About Having '99 Problems but a Vax Ain't One' Dies of COVID. In particular:
He made memes about trusting the Bible over Dr. Anthony Fauci. But in late July, Harmon wrote that he was “on max oxygen” and “struggling to function.” His final tweet July 21 asked supporters to pray for him as he was about to be intubated: “Don’t know when i’ll wake up, please pray.”Why are so many Evangelicals putting their faith in direct conflict with science? It's not as if science has lost any of these fights, ever. Vaccines are clearly demonstrated to be effective in preventing viral infections, and I think most Evangelicals would agree that god does not answer every prayer for healing.
Why not go with the reliable cure? Why are vaccines seen as such a threat? Why not also spurn glasses, for example, since praying to god will either fix your eyesight or not, and using unnatural ocular contraptions is surely an "affront against god's will"? Wouldn't such behavior be theologically consistent? I know many people have died for the sake of their religious identity throughout history. In this case, it seems so gratuitous and irrational. Unlike in prior religious struggles, I see no uplifting moral movement that is motivating this resistance. Only spite.
Part of me appreciates the sad irony of so many conservative Evangelicals winning Darwin Awards, but I really wish they'd just get vaccinated along with everyone else. This kind of virtue signaling is no virtue at all. It's of no benefit to anyone.
I'm curious to hear your thoughts. What am I missing here?
Because nobody ever believes in just one bad idea.Why are so many Evangelicals putting their faith in direct conflict with science?
I suspect it is a matter of proving their faith.
So far through their life, faith hasn't really let them down until this one time.
The need to have faith can be a dangerous message.
This is true and on the other hand you could show the people that die from getting the vaccine or have had adverse effects. Give people all the accurate info and let them make their own decisions.Happens to survive? No. They survived because the virus dosent kill the majority of people it infects.
I know the gist of it though, and it's to do our best to help the vulnerable out which people are doing as evidenced by the vaccine.
Most will do fine. Some need the vaccines.
Singling out one who died by challenging the virus is tragic, but its simply not the majority of cases.
I do recommend taking the vaccine only through careful research and risk assessment.
Respect those who make their own decisions weither the end proves good or bad.
It's up to them as much as it is up to ourselves to make our own free choices on the matter.
As far as I'm concerned, anybody who is eligible for the vaccine and refuses to get it deserves to get good and sick. And if they die, I don't give a damn. Even with the Delta variant, if everyone in the U.S. who could be vaccinated by now was, we would NOT be where we are today. I have ZERO patience with anti-vaxxers.I'm curious to hear your thoughts. What am I missing here?
Grandstand to your heart's content! You are 100% entitled to do so, and 100% correct in what you said in your OP.I'm sorry if you felt like I was grandstanding
According to a Daily Beast article, Man Who Tweeted About Having '99 Problems but a Vax Ain't One' Dies of COVID. In particular:
He made memes about trusting the Bible over Dr. Anthony Fauci. But in late July, Harmon wrote that he was “on max oxygen” and “struggling to function.” His final tweet July 21 asked supporters to pray for him as he was about to be intubated: “Don’t know when i’ll wake up, please pray.”Why are so many Evangelicals putting their faith in direct conflict with science? It's not as if science has lost any of these fights, ever. Vaccines are clearly demonstrated to be effective in preventing viral infections, and I think most Evangelicals would agree that god does not answer every prayer for healing.
Why not go with the reliable cure? Why are vaccines seen as such a threat? Why not also spurn glasses, for example, since praying to god will either fix your eyesight or not, and using unnatural ocular contraptions is surely an "affront against god's will"? Wouldn't such behavior be theologically consistent? I know many people have died for the sake of their religious identity throughout history. In this case, it seems so gratuitous and irrational. Unlike in prior religious struggles, I see no uplifting moral movement that is motivating this resistance. Only spite.
Part of me appreciates the sad irony of so many conservative Evangelicals winning Darwin Awards, but I really wish they'd just get vaccinated along with everyone else. This kind of virtue signaling is no virtue at all. It's of no benefit to anyone.
I'm curious to hear your thoughts. What am I missing here?
Here's to karma then!As far as I'm concerned, anybody who is eligible for the vaccine and refuses to get it deserves to get good and sick. And if they die, I don't give a damn. Even with the Delta variant, if everyone in the U.S. who could be vaccinated by now was, we would NOT be where we are today. I have ZERO patience with anti-vaxxers.
It was early Arabs who gave us good medicine.It was Christians who gave the world modern medicine, so what you write can be strange.
Part of the issue is that in the bible it speaks of those who go to a doctor instead of God. I
am convinced that these stories are not what they seem - the spiritual message is that it's
good to pursue natural outcomes (hard work, saving and investment for wealth, decent
manners and consideration of other for happy living, good diet and doctors for your health
etc.) but don't leave God out of your equation.
Some just take such stories to mean you don't need to attend to worldly advice, just the God
advice. So God can save you instead of doctors - it doesn't work that way as well meaning
people find out.
This is true and on the other hand you could show the people that die from getting the vaccine or have had adverse effects. Give people all the accurate info and let them make their own decisions.
You could point out that you're more likely to be injured driving to the clinic, or to church next Sunday, than from the vaccine.This is true and on the other hand you could show the people that die from getting the vaccine or have had adverse effects. Give people all the accurate info and let them make their own decisions.
As far as I'm concerned, anybody who is eligible for the vaccine and refuses to get it deserves to get good and sick. And if they die, I don't give a damn. Even with the Delta variant, if everyone in the U.S. who could be vaccinated by now was, we would NOT be where we are today. I have ZERO patience with anti-vaxxers.
It was early Arabs who gave us good medicine.
Eveone else? Well...
After the unvaccinated have died off to COVID, then what?
After they find the perfect vaccine we would be potentionally killing off each other while provaxxers laugh in our face.
I'm actually serious, though with this comment. That, or set us in our own island.
I read a lot against antivaxxers but the only thing you guys wish is that the unvaccinated get sick. Instead of wishing us sick, is there a much more humane way to handle us so we may not possibly affect others?
What's provaxxers solution to this without pinning people down and holding a needle to their face?
Personally, I believe this is largely due to the Hollywoodisation of American discourse. Everything is dichotomously "good" or "bad". And you pick your "side", and then that determines what you think is which. Since the tribal conservative "side" decided that that science based responses to the pandemic were "bad", this has dictated tribal conservative responses to medical treatment.According to a Daily Beast article, Man Who Tweeted About Having '99 Problems but a Vax Ain't One' Dies of COVID. In particular:
He made memes about trusting the Bible over Dr. Anthony Fauci. But in late July, Harmon wrote that he was “on max oxygen” and “struggling to function.” His final tweet July 21 asked supporters to pray for him as he was about to be intubated: “Don’t know when i’ll wake up, please pray.”Why are so many Evangelicals putting their faith in direct conflict with science? It's not as if science has lost any of these fights, ever. Vaccines are clearly demonstrated to be effective in preventing viral infections, and I think most Evangelicals would agree that god does not answer every prayer for healing.
Why not go with the reliable cure? Why are vaccines seen as such a threat? Why not also spurn glasses, for example, since praying to god will either fix your eyesight or not, and using unnatural ocular contraptions is surely an "affront against god's will"? Wouldn't such behavior be theologically consistent? I know many people have died for the sake of their religious identity throughout history. In this case, it seems so gratuitous and irrational. Unlike in prior religious struggles, I see no uplifting moral movement that is motivating this resistance. Only spite.
Part of me appreciates the sad irony of so many conservative Evangelicals winning Darwin Awards, but I really wish they'd just get vaccinated along with everyone else. This kind of virtue signaling is no virtue at all. It's of no benefit to anyone.
I'm curious to hear your thoughts. What am I missing here?
Cue conspiracy theories about vaccine requirements being anti-freedom.Yes, there's a solution for anti-vaxers. Isolation, travel restrictions and barring from social events.
It was some antivexers who brought measles back to America from Europe. Start right there - no
air travel without vaccines.
The vaccine can have harmful side effects and it isn't suicidal to not have it. You're most likely to survive anyway.I put them on par with someone who puts on a blindfold, runs through a busy intersection, and happens to survive, rather than looking both ways and waiting for the walk signal.
Old people may be in more need for the vaccines as well as sick people. For others it is simply about preference (though it is to the old and the sick as well of course).But what @Twilight Hue says above suggests that you need not get the vaccine until AFTER you find out you are infected and might not do well.