I tend to see the differences I have with other people more than what we share. When I meet people, I tend to expect them to be radically different from me, since I know that they are (generally) statistically more likely to be different from me than they are to be similar to me.
When I do discover what seem to be similarities, I'm not very quick to assume that we're as similar in that respect as we appear to be. For instance, if I meet someone else who claims to follow Enlightenment philosophy, I am more likely to think they're a utilitarian or believe in an authoritarian social contract than that they adhere to Socratic virtue ethics like I do. If they explicitly state they are a Stoic, I'm more likely to think they're probably a homophobic conservative, even though I consider myself to be aligned with Stoic values and I'm a pro-LGBTQ+ leftist.
In an international English-speaking forum, I tend to think most posters are going to be non-American since most English speakers with internet access live outside of America. I've noticed many other Americans tend to assume that everyone is American, which is strange to me.
And so on, for every relevant point of data.
I don't consider myself to have any people in my corner, either. I don't consider myself to be a part of any group. Even on RF, while I tend to agree a lot with the other atheists here, there are many things we disagree on and I often find their presentation to be, uh, not to my tastes. I don't feel like we're a part of the same "group" in any meaningful way.
As for "my people," in hindsight, maybe I shouldn't have responded to this post. The way you're defining them, I don't think I have any "people." I don't feel close to anyone. I'm rather incapable of that level of human sentiment. I tend to cut contact with people when I think they've become too emotionally intimate with me because I know that I can't reciprocate, so it seems like I'm morally obligated to avoid leading them on only to hurt them later.
There are people that I will seek out for one-on-one discussions, some of which I have known for years now. These people are probably the closest I get to friends, but I have a decent amount of detachment with all of them. They do tend to be introverted, cerebral people, which I think is fair to say is a description that matches me, too. I find that those people are more willing to have the kinds of discussions that interest me and they tend to be more understanding of my asociality. "Birds of a feather flock together," after all.
I actually don't know very much about them and I haven't even seen most of their faces or heard their voices. That's simply not the kind of discussions we have. We talk more about philosophy, gothic art, and technology. The ones that I have seen the faces of are the ones that I talk about makeup and fashion with, so their appearance became relevant to one of our conversations.
Out of the people that I have seen, they seem to vary in appearance slightly less than I would expect from a normal distribution. Somehow, without knowing what they look like, I have still ended up with a statistically significant number of people that I speak to who share my ethnicity. This disappoints me, because it seems to indicate that I am not as objective or cosmopolitan as I wish I was (eta: although there still is quite a bit of diversity there). I also tend to befriend people in the same general class as me (i.e., poor), but that's partially because I find people who make more money than me to be incredibly annoying with their first-world problems.
On the other hand, I tend to be the "token chick" in tech spaces. I've had people tell me that they thought I was a dude and other people seriously ask me if I'm trans or "a trap." I don't know how common that is, but I know a few women who pretend to be men online to avoid that sexist attention. It doesn't really bother me, but I do think less of the people who say that sort of stuff. I wonder sometimes how many other people in these spaces are also women and are simply less willing to deal with the consequences of being openly female. Because of that, I don't actually know the real gender ratio of the people I speak to, but from the ones that I've seen pictures of and have been open with me, it seems that I tend to have about an even spread of women, men, and enbies.
I don't know how I ended up with so many nonbinary friends. It's another interesting statistical quirk. I suspect that it's because I'm autistic, most of my interests are ones that have a higher portion of autistic people involved in them, and autistic people have a much higher chance of being nonbinary. So it might actually be that we are similar in the sense of being on the spectrum, we're just different when it comes to gender.
This was a much longer post than I was expecting, but I wanted to be thorough.