ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
So you're just going to completely ignore the fact that you cited an obvious reactionary propagandist and pivot to a different topic? Cool.Care to comment on the pictures of neo-Nazi Ukrainian soldiers? Ukraine damages its own reputation. Don't attack someone for bringing it to light just because you disagree with their political views. That's just lazy. I can't believe you haven't heard of the Nazis in the Ukrainian armed forces. Good grief. Maybe you should actually go read about the people you are throwing your support behind and holding up as heroes.
Profile: Who are Ukraine’s far-right Azov regiment?
The regiment, which has been accused of neo-Nazi ties, has since been absorbed in the national army.www.aljazeera.com
Meanwhile, in reality, the Azov battalion number about 2,000 members, and were a voluntary army only incorporated into Ukraine's National Guard as a direct response to the Russian separatist annexation of the Donbas in 2014. (SOURCES: Azov Brigade - Wikipedia, How a Far-Right Battalion Became a Part of Ukraine’s National Guard, Azov Battalion - The Defenders of Mariupol)
I don't know about you, but if I was the leader of a Ukraine's military, and a bunch of extreme far-right people with guns and a serious dislike of Russians all said "Hey, could we help you deal with this Russian-funded separatist army that have illegally annexed territory in our country?", I would probably be willing to throw them at the problem, too. Seems like a win-win, to me.
The only issue I see with it is that people like you are willing to lie, manipulate and (often) ignore the truth of the situation in order to paint Ukraine as somehow deserving of being invaded. With one mouth you decry war and call out the villainy of the US and NATO apparently using Ukraine in a proxy war against Russia, shedding crocodile tears for the poor, poor people of Ukraine who are just being used as puppets; while with the other mouth you literally call Ukraine a Nazi state.
That's the problem with being a reactionary. No ideological consistency, no acknowledgement of reality. You'll do and say anything as long as it can marginally serve the purpose of justifying or excusing Russia invading their neighbour because... I dunno, why, really. Smug self-superiority and contrarianism? Pretensions of anti-imperialism that just so happen to end up advocating for actual imperialism? Being just a literal imperialist?
I just don't get it. Why climb a tree and tell a lie when you can stand on the ground and tell the truth?